If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
In article t,
Tank Fixer wrote: In article , on 31 Aug 2004 00:24:30 GMT, OXMORON1 attempted to say ..... Art bellowed: When it comes to reneging Bush is king of the hill. At least Clinton didn't join the reserve and then go AWOL. Besides Clinton was a great president. Bush was th worst in history. Wish Clinton were back in office right now. Hell Art, Clinton signed up for advanced ROTC then reneged on the agreement. I will agreed that Clinton is not the worst President ever for the US, but he sure made a lot of others look real good. Made Milton Filmore look like agreat president... Not to mention Millard Fillmore. :} |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
on Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:15:58 -0700, Steve Hix NVALID attempted to say ..... In article t, Tank Fixer wrote: In article , on 31 Aug 2004 00:24:30 GMT, OXMORON1 attempted to say ..... Art bellowed: When it comes to reneging Bush is king of the hill. At least Clinton didn't join the reserve and then go AWOL. Besides Clinton was a great president. Bush was th worst in history. Wish Clinton were back in office right now. Hell Art, Clinton signed up for advanced ROTC then reneged on the agreement. I will agreed that Clinton is not the worst President ever for the US, but he sure made a lot of others look real good. Made Milton Filmore look like agreat president... Not to mention Millard Fillmore. :} DOH Yeah, him too... ;') -- When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Stickney" wrote in message ... snip Actually, on studying the 1940 Presidential campaign, the number of Midwestern Progressives (Then the highly Liberal Wing of teh Democratic Party) threw in with the Germans. Many accepted campaign conributions (To the tune of about 5 Million 1940 Dollars), and quite a few actually made it into the Abwehr's books as Paid Agents. (Including John L. Louis, head of the United Mine Workers) That last bit is interesting, if not surprising. My Dad is a WWII vet, and to this day the mere mention of John L. Lewis will invariably instigate a long succession of unprintable words. John L. not only tried to sell us out before we got into the war, but he threatened to strike while it was still ongoing--striking for better wages at a time when the millions of men in uniform were making a fraction of what the average UMW miner was bringing home each week. Brooks -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
(ArtKramr) wrote in
: [snip] When it comes to reneging Bush is king of the hill. At least Clinton didn't join the reserve and then go AWOL. Besides Clinton was a great Bush served all of the term he was required to. In fact most years he put in many times the hours he was legally required to serve.. president. Bush was th worst in history. Wish Clinton were back in office right now. Klintoon is a lying pot-smoking philandering treasonous swine. He left an economy coming apart to the incoming Bush administration. Maybe you thought we hadn't noticed. IBM __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Why didn't Bush fight?
From: Ian MacLure Date: 8/30/2004 10:19 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: ZombyWoof wrote in : On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:40:55 -0600, "S. O. Damocles" wrote something wonderfully witty: ArtKramr wrote: Anyone have a reasion? Any reason? Cowardice? Could have been. But in order to know you have to be able to read a mans soul. Can you do that? When it comes to combat, men's souls ar easily read. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
I wrote:
I will agreed that Clinton is not the worst President ever for the US, but he sure made a lot of others look real good. Tank Fixer wrote: Made Milton Filmore look like agreat president... He was caught with: Not to mention Millard Fillmore. :} He intoned DOH Yeah, him too... ;') Darn Boy, I set 'em up for you and you blow the punch lines. Rick Clark Millard Fillmore appreciation Society |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
On 8/30/04 5:09 AM, in article , "William
Black" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message m... You should have known that, but then your egregious cross-posting tells us even more about you than does your apparent naivete. I didn't cross post anything, I didn't cut any groups either. You must be new to Usenet... (Awaits loud roar of anger that always erupts when someone is accused of being a newby) No WB, I'm not new to USENET, but still capable of newby mistakes. For example, I wondered where that last paragraph went concerning "egregious cross-posting". I had thought that I deleted it. As to cross-posting or cutting previously cross-posted NGs from a response, I believe (whether it is USENET convention or not) that the list of NGs to which a post is sent, even in response, is the responsibility of the poster. I had no wish to post to or hear from anyone on alt.music.bush so I deleted that NG from the address line of my response. According to Google, the original thread seems to have come from ArtKramer in soc.history.medieval -- Subject: Why didn't Bush fight in Viet Nam? Date: 2004-02-17 07:02:54 PST -- with no change in NG through all 15 messages. But it seems it was Bob Coe's post which was "egregiously] cross-posted", though I haven't yet found how the message made the jump from s.h.m. to r.a.m. It's probably in Google somewhere for some meticulous person with a lot of time on his hands to find. Subject: babble, was Why didn't Bush fight? Newsgroups: alt.military.retired, alt.military.uk, alt.music.bush, rec.aviation.military, sci.military.naval, soc.veterans, us.military.army, us.military.national-guard Date: 2004-08-29 13:59:09 PST There have been several threads started with the word "Babble" in the title, apparently as a follow-on not only to "Why didn't Bush fight in Viet Nam?" and but also to others, so delving any further seems a waste of time. I'm neither a proficient nor a determined miner of Google's USENET, so there is more there than meets my eye no doubt, concerning the genealogy of the post in question. At worst, it seems to me that you only continued the cross-posting rather than initiating it, and I suppose that including only one NG which I considered inappropriate hardly makes it "egregious" anyway, so I apologize to both you and Bob Cole for that. -- Jack |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
ArtKramr wrote:
Besides Clinton was a great president. So the Kramer doctrine *now* says that you don't have to have military or combat experience as long as your a great president???????????? You sorry, confused old man. How can you see into the future to determine if someone is going to be a great president? This really is beginning to look worse everyday....sad... BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
George W. Bush Abortion Scandal that should have been | Psalm 110 | Military Aviation | 0 | August 12th 04 09:40 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |