Heathrow crash

Stefan wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip schrieb:

Yeah, I found mainstream news reports on it after I posted that. They
seem to be insisting it wasn't waxing, but actual ice in the fuel,
which would be a very rare event. i have had it happen to me using
Avgas. When 100LL came out first it had a habit of keeping water in
suspension. I nearly came to grief, in fact, as did many others. that
problem was solved with 100LL AFAIK, though. When I heard about the
accident first I thought it might have been duff fuel they got in
China, bu tI see no finger pointing in that direction. in some parts
of the world the fuel is still pretty crude, being fairly wide cut.
The engines sem to digest it with no problem, but fire hazards while
fueling are greatly increased by them and I've often wondered if
there are other risks. i have no idea what they refueled with in
China or how carefully the fuel's quality is looked after.

Blah blah blah


Oh do tell, fjukktard.


Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...


Yeah, I found mainstream news reports on it after I posted that. They
seem to be insisting it wasn't waxing, but actual ice in the fuel, which
would be a very rare event.

Ya got a link?

i have had it happen to me using Avgas. When
100LL came out first it had a habit of keeping water in suspension. I
nearly came to grief, in fact, as did many others. that problem was
solved with 100LL AFAIK, though.

You forgot to begin this with "Once upon a time".

When I heard about the accident first I
thought it might have been duff fuel they got in China, bu tI see no
finger pointing in that direction. in some parts of the world the fuel
is still pretty crude, being fairly wide cut.

Got a link???


The engines sem to digest
it with no problem, but fire hazards while fueling are greatly increased
by them and I've often wondered if there are other risks. i have no idea
what they refueled with in China or how carefully the fuel's quality is
looked after.


Bertie

Sounds more like Bert****.

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
Stefan wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip schrieb:

Yeah, I found mainstream news reports on it after I posted that. They
seem to be insisting it wasn't waxing, but actual ice in the fuel,
which would be a very rare event. i have had it happen to me using
Avgas. When 100LL came out first it had a habit of keeping water in
suspension. I nearly came to grief, in fact, as did many others. that
problem was solved with 100LL AFAIK, though. When I heard about the
accident first I thought it might have been duff fuel they got in
China, bu tI see no finger pointing in that direction. in some parts
of the world the fuel is still pretty crude, being fairly wide cut.
The engines sem to digest it with no problem, but fire hazards while
fueling are greatly increased by them and I've often wondered if
there are other risks. i have no idea what they refueled with in
China or how carefully the fuel's quality is looked after.

Blah blah blah


Oh do tell, fjukktard.


Bertie

There ya go, get that cross posting **** going, dumb ass.

"Andy Hawkins" wrote in message
...
Hi,

In article ,
Bertie the wrote:
Yeah, I found mainstream news reports on it after I posted that. They
seem to be insisting it wasn't waxing, but actual ice in the fuel, which
would be a very rare event. i have had it happen to me using Avgas. When
100LL came out first it had a habit of keeping water in suspension. I
nearly came to grief, in fact, as did many others. that problem was
solved with 100LL AFAIK, though. When I heard about the accident first I
thought it might have been duff fuel they got in China, bu tI see no
finger pointing in that direction. in some parts of the world the fuel
is still pretty crude, being fairly wide cut. The engines sem to digest
it with no problem, but fire hazards while fueling are greatly increased
by them and I've often wondered if there are other risks. i have no idea
what they refueled with in China or how carefully the fuel's quality is
looked after.

As you say, sounds odd. Hopefully the final report will shed a bit more
light on things.

Thanks for the info.

Andy

You should be cross posting this **** to Andy, your hero is.

"Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net wrote in :


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...


Yeah, I found mainstream news reports on it after I posted that. They
seem to be insisting it wasn't waxing, but actual ice in the fuel,
which
would be a very rare event.

Ya got a link?



No fjukkktard. do your own research.


i have had it happen to me using Avgas. When
100LL came out first it had a habit of keeping water in suspension. I
nearly came to grief, in fact, as did many others. that problem was
solved with 100LL AFAIK, though.

You forgot to begin this with "Once upon a time".

When I heard about the accident first I
thought it might have been duff fuel they got in China, bu tI see no
finger pointing in that direction. in some parts of the world the
fuel
is still pretty crude, being fairly wide cut.

Got a link???


Don't need one. I dind't look it up fjukkkwit.


The engines sem to digest
it with no problem, but fire hazards while fueling are greatly
increased
by them and I've often wondered if there are other risks. i have no
idea
what they refueled with in China or how carefully the fuel's quality
is
looked after.


Bertie

Sounds more like Bert****.



To a halfwit like you, of course it does.


Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
Stefan wrote in news:6fade$48c11b12$54497efa
:

Bertie the Bunyip schrieb:

...
I've heard today that the report came out but I can't find it on the
net. I'd be able to comment more fully if I had it to read.

It isn't exactly fuel icing, but what's called waxing. The fuel gets
...

Funny that you say that you haven't read the report (BTW intermediate,
not final), but this doesn't stop you to explain in detail what has
happened.


I dodn't explain in detail what hapened, fjukkwit. I explained the
shortcomings of airliner fuel systems in general.

Even more funny that despite your attitude you're completely wrong. It
*was* icing. Read the report.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mh6pZQX22CQ


Bertie

You don't explain anything, you just talk ****.

Link is a dumb assed re-run, but a great example of you **** poor attitude.

"Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net wrote in :


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
Stefan wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip schrieb:

Yeah, I found mainstream news reports on it after I posted that.
They
seem to be insisting it wasn't waxing, but actual ice in the fuel,
which would be a very rare event. i have had it happen to me using
Avgas. When 100LL came out first it had a habit of keeping water in
suspension. I nearly came to grief, in fact, as did many others.
that
problem was solved with 100LL AFAIK, though. When I heard about the
accident first I thought it might have been duff fuel they got in
China, bu tI see no finger pointing in that direction. in some
parts
of the world the fuel is still pretty crude, being fairly wide cut.
The engines sem to digest it with no problem, but fire hazards
while
fueling are greatly increased by them and I've often wondered if
there are other risks. i have no idea what they refueled with in
China or how carefully the fuel's quality is looked after.

Blah blah blah


Oh do tell, fjukktard.


Bertie

There ya go, get that cross posting **** going, dumb ass.


Every time i respond to you. That's the way it works! I see a k00k and I
share, maxie



Bertie

"Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net wrote in :


"Andy Hawkins" wrote in message
...
Hi,

In article ,
Bertie the wrote:
Yeah, I found mainstream news reports on it after I posted that.
They seem to be insisting it wasn't waxing, but actual ice in the
fuel, which would be a very rare event. i have had it happen to me
using Avgas. When 100LL came out first it had a habit of keeping
water in suspension. I nearly came to grief, in fact, as did many
others. that problem was solved with 100LL AFAIK, though. When I
heard about the accident first I thought it might have been duff
fuel they got in China, bu tI see no finger pointing in that
direction. in some parts of the world the fuel is still pretty
crude, being fairly wide cut. The engines sem to digest it with no
problem, but fire hazards while fueling are greatly increased by
them and I've often wondered if there are other risks. i have no
idea what they refueled with in China or how carefully the fuel's
quality is looked after.

As you say, sounds odd. Hopefully the final report will shed a bit
more light on things.

Thanks for the info.

Andy

You should be cross posting this **** to Andy, your hero is.



Yes yes gibber boi.



Bertie

"Lonnie" @_#~#@.^net wrote in :


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
Stefan wrote in
news:6fade$48c11b12$54497efa :

Bertie the Bunyip schrieb:

...
I've heard today that the report came out but I can't find it on
the net. I'd be able to comment more fully if I had it to read.

It isn't exactly fuel icing, but what's called waxing. The fuel
gets
...

Funny that you say that you haven't read the report (BTW
intermediate, not final), but this doesn't stop you to explain in
detail what has happened.


I dodn't explain in detail what hapened, fjukkwit. I explained the
shortcomings of airliner fuel systems in general.

Even more funny that despite your attitude you're completely wrong.
It *was* icing. Read the report.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mh6pZQX22CQ


Bertie

You don't explain anything, you just talk ****.

Link is a dumb assed re-run, but a great example of you **** poor
attitude.


Thenkew.


Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...

Put up or shut up lamer. You pulled every bit of that, right out of your
ass.