A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tanker pt2



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 16th 06, 03:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Tanker pt2

Pentagon Tanker Study
Supports Both Boeing, Airbus
By ANDY PASZTOR
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
January 26, 2006 11:14 p.m.
LOS ANGELES -- The Pentagon's long-awaited analysis of options for new
aerial-refueling tankers calls for the Air Force to acquire*and convert
"medium to large" commercial jetliners,*potentially larger than Boeing
Co.'s 767, and perhaps also buy planes from European rival Airbus,
according to a senior Democratic Congressman.
Rep. Norm Dicks of Washington,*after being briefed on the report earlier
today, put out a release indicating that a number of Boeing and Airbus
aircraft*probably "would meet the requirement,"*including the Boeing
747, 777, 787 models, as well as Airbus A330 and A340 models.
Rep. Dicks, a senior member of the House Armed Services Committee and a
staunch Boeing supporter*whose district includes many Boeing employees,
added that the study stopped short of "definitive conclusions about the
timing" of replacing the current aging tanker fleet. Prompted by*years
of scandal, protracted controversy and a spate of Congressional and
Pentagon investigations involving earlier Air Force tanker decisions,
the latest document is expected to open the door for Airbus to compete
for any order. It's also likely to provide ammunition for Pentagon brass
inclined to pick aircraft larger than Boeing's twin-engine 767 model,
though in his statement the Congressman said he believes the 767 likely
also would meet Air Force requirements.
Arguments over how many new aerial-refueling tankers the Air Force
needs, and how quickly they need to be put into service, embroiled
Chicago-based Boeing in a long-running dispute with members of the
Senate Armed Services Committee and particularly Republican Sen. John
McCain of Arizona. Sen. McCain led the charge against the Air Force for
skirting acquisition procedures years ago in trying to rush through
a*$20-billion plus*deal to lease or*buy some 100 Boeing 767 aircraft*for
use as*tankers.*
The latest study,*which*is based partly on analytical work*by Rand Corp,
a Santa Monica, Ca. think tank, concludes that "factors other than
economic concerns should drive the acquisition schedule for tanker
recapitalization," according to Rep. Dicks. The Congressman said he
expects the Pentagon later this year to seek expressions of interest
from Boeing and Airbus for the initial phase of a proposed tanker
replacement program. But*it could take a long time, perhaps even
years,*until the Air Force puts out formal bids. And*current Pentagon
budget pressures*are likely to make any large-scale acquisition
program*difficult to fund. Rep. Dicks said the Air Force has $100
million in*seed money previously appropriated by Congress to launch any
program.
Write to Andy Pasztor at
  #2  
Old April 16th 06, 12:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Tanker pt2

LOS ANGELES -- The Pentagon's long-awaited analysis of options for new
aerial-refueling tankers calls for the Air Force to acquire and convert
"medium to large" commercial jetliners, potentially larger than Boeing
Co.'s 767, and perhaps also buy planes from European rival Airbus,
according to a senior Democratic Congressman.


I wonder how many hours those finally-to-be-replaced KC-135 airframes
have on them? They must have some truly prodigious numbers, given the
amount of time spent on-station, from Viet Nam till now...
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tanker Competition On john smith Piloting 0 April 16th 06 03:06 AM
F-14 used as a tanker? Mike Weeks Naval Aviation 11 July 8th 04 03:02 PM
Nice Fake: Tanker refueling a tanker refueling a tanker :) Jan Gelbrich Military Aviation 2 April 23rd 04 09:12 PM
Boeing B-767 Tanker case "Virtual Kryptonite" BJ Military Aviation 1 December 20th 03 05:15 AM
EADS aims at USAF tanker market Matt Wiser Military Aviation 0 September 20th 03 05:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.