Bush Made Sure 9/11 Would Happen--The Novel

On Thu, 06 May 2004 02:42:00 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


Maybe you need to elaborate on how nonexistent procedures can cause
something to happen.

I see as usual, you can't.

I will not answer a preposterous disingenuous question.

Mostly because you can't.

Totally becuase it is a preposterous disingenuous question.

Do the FAA procedures exist that require NORAD to scramble fighters,
yes or no?

Because you shriek
non existent procedures doesn't make it so.

I "shriek" nothing, Bryan. You are the one who says the procedures
that require NORAD to scramble planes don't exist.

Here is what I stated: " True: FAA regulations do not specifically tell
NORAD to scramble AC. FAA Procedures explain what duties NORAD are during
the intercept".

And with no FAA procedures requiring NORAD to scramble, it's kind of
hard to follow those nonexistent procedures and have a successful
intercept.

Simply fascinating! "Do not specifically tell" equates to nonexistent in
your world.

In the real world, Bryan, that is correct. If there are no procedures
telling NORAD to scramble fighters, then those procedures obviously
don't exist. If they do, why don't you cite them? Oh, yeah, you've
said that they don't exist.

On Thu, 06 May 2004 11:39:32 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


A non-responsive answer as usual.

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 06 May 2004 02:42:00 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:

Simply fascinating! "Do not specifically tell" equates to nonexistent in
your world.

In the real world, Bryan, that is correct.

NO, in your usenet world. snicker

If there are no procedures
telling NORAD to scramble fighters, then those procedures obviously
don't exist. If they do, why don't you cite them? Oh, yeah, you've
said that they don't exist.

FAA Procedures don't give the FAA authority over the US Military. Maybe in
your world of Usenet marshmellow pies. Here is what I stated, again:
"FAA regulations do not specifically tell NORAD to scramble AC. FAA
Procedures explain what duties NORAD are during the intercept". What part of
the sentence containing the word "specifically" don't you understand and how
does one equate this as evidence nonexistent procedures for intercept is
beyond preposterous.

wrote in message
news
On Thu, 06 May 2004 11:39:32 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


A non-responsive answer as usual.

A snip and tuck as usual! snicker

http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&l...cvl ny.cv.net

Agent86's List of Misconceptions of FAA Procedures Zero for 15 Putz!!!

On Fri, 07 May 2004 00:00:37 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 06 May 2004 02:42:00 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:

Simply fascinating! "Do not specifically tell" equates to nonexistent in
your world.

In the real world, Bryan, that is correct.

NO, in your usenet world. snicker

Then go ahead and explain how procedures that don't tell NORAD to
scramble aircraft can result in the launch of aircraft.

If there are no procedures
telling NORAD to scramble fighters, then those procedures obviously
don't exist. If they do, why don't you cite them? Oh, yeah, you've
said that they don't exist.

FAA Procedures don't give the FAA authority over the US Military. Maybe in
your world of Usenet marshmellow pies. Here is what I stated, again:
"FAA regulations do not specifically tell NORAD to scramble AC. FAA
Procedures explain what duties NORAD are during the intercept". What part of
the sentence containing the word "specifically" don't you understand and how
does one equate this as evidence nonexistent procedures for intercept is
beyond preposterous.

Only to you, Bryan.

On Fri, 07 May 2004 00:04:37 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:

A non-responsive answer as usual.