A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pneumatic switching?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 13th 05, 04:12 AM
bumper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pneumatic switching?

On a self-launch with pylon mounted prop, the prop wash can interfere with a
probe mounted on the vertical fin. One way to get around this is to use a
pneumatic switch to change from tail probe to nose pitot/fuselage static
when running the engine. Question is, what plumbing is best to switch,
pitot, static, TE or combination of these?

Glider in question is equipped with a 302 using pneumatic compensation (not
electronic) and Tasman electronic back-up vario (no flask). Currently tail
TE is plumbed to both varios direct (no switching). Two ganged pneumatic
switches are used for the 302 pitot and static inputs to switch these from
fuselage when motoring, to tail probe when soaring. ASI is connected to nose
pitot/fuselage static (no switching). This configuration seems to work okay,
but is this really the optimal configuration? For more sensitive detection
of lift during self-launching, would it be better to switch the vario/s TE
input from tail TE to cockpit or fuselage static, and forgo switching
either pitot or static to the 302?

Thanks for any input on this.

all the best,

bumper



  #2  
Old March 13th 05, 04:42 AM
Marc Ramsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

bumper wrote:
This configuration seems to work okay,
but is this really the optimal configuration? For more sensitive detection
of lift during self-launching, would it be better to switch the vario/s TE
input from tail TE to cockpit or fuselage static, and forgo switching
either pitot or static to the 302?


If it were my glider, I'd always run the 302 off the nose pitot and
fuselage static, using the 302s (excellent) electronic total energy
compensation. The Tasman would always be connected to the TE probe, and
just ignored when the engine is running. There is no need to add the
complication of pneumatic switches...

Marc
  #3  
Old March 13th 05, 05:59 AM
5Z
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have my varios plumbed as Marc suggests, but in my case the other
vario is a Winter. It bounces all over the place while under power,
while the 302 provides an excellent aid in finding and centering a
thermal ASAP after launch.

-Tom

  #4  
Old March 13th 05, 07:07 PM
soarski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That's how my TwinIII SL was working. With a Peschges VP 6, that did
it's own thing with Pitot and static for TE compensation.
The ship did have a Pneumatic switch, and simply turned the Probe on
and off in the back. I think I was able to also feed the VP 6 with the
probe, but never did, and compared

Dieter

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flap handle activated Climb/Cruise switching Andy Smielkiewicz Soaring 5 March 14th 05 04:54 AM
Switching to JeppView Travis Marlatte Instrument Flight Rules 16 December 19th 04 04:25 PM
Airmen at Osan switching from M16A2 to lighter M4 carbine, By Franklin Fisher, Stars and Stripes Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 April 29th 04 04:07 AM
Switching to ground.... David Rind Piloting 85 April 16th 04 06:53 PM
Transponder code switching Ken Pruchnick Instrument Flight Rules 30 October 12th 03 08:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.