Disclosure Imminent? Eight + Underground NWO Bases Destroyed?

On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having one
doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

In article ,
"Keith Willshaw" wrote:

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:31:48 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Quaalude wrote:

https://www.divinecosmos.com/start-h...dergroundbases

Ah the website of kook central.

Why do you say that?

Its an amusing mix of ignorance and plain kookiness

I especially liked the claim that the Vatican bank had been
secretly controlling the world since the time of Julius Caesar
who of course died in 44 BC.

Forward looking bunch, those Romans.

On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:59:48 -0500, Dan wrote:

On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having one
doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

I've had several for several USAF, NSA and CIA projects including "Q"
and subsections of TS.

I fail to see the point you are making.

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:57:17 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

No it is a proven fact that there were bankers before the Templars.

Fine.

Back on topic, to be right, you would have to submit more than your
opinion regarding the content of the article in question. You would
have to propose that the DUMBs are intact.

Assailing the writer(s) is extremely weak sauce as surely you are aware.
Personal attacks in lieu of facts is the realm of the, how should I say
this, imbeciles and whackos.

On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:33:02 -0700, Steve Hix wrote:

In article ,
"Keith Willshaw" wrote:

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:31:48 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Quaalude wrote:

https://www.divinecosmos.com/start-h...dergroundbases

Ah the website of kook central.

Why do you say that?

Its an amusing mix of ignorance and plain kookiness

I especially liked the claim that the Vatican bank had been
secretly controlling the world since the time of Julius Caesar
who of course died in 44 BC.

Forward looking bunch, those Romans.

Not as much so as the Egyptians and the other highly advanced
civilizations that built the geometrically perfect, astronomically
accurate pyramids across the world as warning signs for the generation
of today.

On 10/8/2011 3:53 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:59:48 -0500, Dan wrote:

On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having one
doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

I've had several for several USAF, NSA and CIA projects including "Q"
and subsections of TS.

I fail to see the point you are making.

OK, since it is obvious you have never actually held a clearance I
will keep it simple. If person A and person B each hold an identical
clearance but work for different activities A doesn't have a need to
know what B is doing.

BTW, there's no such thing as a USAF clearance. The confidential,
secret and top secret clearances are DOD.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On 10/8/2011 3:58 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:33:02 -0700, Steve Hix wrote:

In ,
"Keith wrote:

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:31:48 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Quaalude wrote:

https://www.divinecosmos.com/start-h...dergroundbases

Ah the website of kook central.

Why do you say that?

Its an amusing mix of ignorance and plain kookiness

I especially liked the claim that the Vatican bank had been
secretly controlling the world since the time of Julius Caesar
who of course died in 44 BC.

Forward looking bunch, those Romans.

Not as much so as the Egyptians and the other highly advanced
civilizations that built the geometrically perfect, astronomically
accurate pyramids across the world as warning signs for the generation
of today.

No, the stars the pyramids may have been aligned with have moved out
of alignment since then. If the ancients wanted us to use the pyramids
as you suggest they would be in alignment now.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:18:41 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:51:08 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

..whether one agrees or not, David
Wilcock is far from being ignorant. Neither is Fulford.

Because you may disagree with them may mean kooky to you, that is
your choosing but ignorant they are not.

Do I assume correctly that you do not believe the essence of the
DUMB destruction/story?

Thats putting it mildly.

Put it bluntly then.

Its a crock of s**t dreamt up by conspirowhackos and believed
by imbeciles.

Perhaps you're right. Perhaps not. To be right, you would have to
submit more than your opinion regarding the content of the article in
question.

I did and in fact pointed outr some imbecilic errors

You would have to propose that the DUMBs are intact.


There are pleaty of dumbs out there.

Keith

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:59:48 -0500, Dan wrote:

On 10/8/2011 2:41 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there
will be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for
more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason
not to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered
years later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

If you have ever held a security clearance you'd know just having
one doesn't prove a need to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

I've had several for several USAF, NSA and CIA projects including "Q"
and subsections of TS.


Bull**** , if you had a security clearance at any level you would
recognize why.

Keith

Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:57:17 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

No it is a proven fact that there were bankers before the Templars.

Fine.

Back on topic, to be right, you would have to submit more than your
opinion regarding the content of the article in question. You would
have to propose that the DUMBs are intact.


You are living proof that there is no shortage of DUMB's


Keith