If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Best dogfight gun?
It takes time to wind up and has a small projectile, so how does the M61 really stack up against, say, the BK27 og Giat 30mm as far as dogfighting is concerned? Even with the PGU28? Is shot density the primary factor to look at? Regards... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Bjørnar Bolsøy" wrote: It takes time to wind up and has a small projectile, so how does the M61 really stack up against, say, the BK27 og Giat 30mm as far as dogfighting is concerned? Even with the PGU28? Is shot density the primary factor to look at? Major factors a 1. muzzle velocity 2. bullet mass 3. rate of fire They all have to work together to raise PK (probability of kill). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Bjørnar Bolsøy" wrote in message ...
It takes time to wind up and has a small projectile, so how does the M61 really stack up against, say, the BK27 og Giat 30mm as far as dogfighting is concerned? Even with the PGU28? Is shot density the primary factor to look at? Regards... The M61 is a poor substitute for this bad baby: http://www.airforce-technology.com/c.../mauser21.html Rob |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 04:28:01 GMT, Chad Irby wrote:
In article , (robert arndt) wrote: The M61 is a poor substitute for this bad baby: http://www.airforce-technology.com/c.../mauser21.html ...if you don't mind only firing 1,700 rounds per minute as opposed to about 6,000... Look at the spool up times ;-)... Whats the avarage gun burst time in a dogfight... Cheers John Cook Any spelling mistakes/grammatic errors are there purely to annoy. All opinions are mine, not TAFE's however much they beg me for them. Email Address :- Spam trap - please remove (trousers) to email me Eurofighter Website :- http://www.eurofighter-typhoon.co.uk |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
John Cook wrote: On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 04:28:01 GMT, Chad Irby wrote: In article , (robert arndt) wrote: The M61 is a poor substitute for this bad baby: http://www.airforce-technology.com/c...2/mauser21.htm l ...if you don't mind only firing 1,700 rounds per minute as opposed to about 6,000... Look at the spool up times ;-)... If you forget to warm up your Gatling, you're probably the sort to forget to arm the darned thing to begin with. The technical term for that is "dead guy." Whats the avarage gun burst time in a dogfight... Whatever it is, you're going to have to hold the trigger down for over three times that to get the same amount of fire downrange. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 07:45:39 GMT, Chad Irby wrote:
Whats the avarage gun burst time in a dogfight... Whatever it is, you're going to have to hold the trigger down for over three times that to get the same amount of fire downrange. Given the that the designer of the mig-29 is on record as saying that he should have halved the number of rounds carried for its gsh-30L. Tony Williams has a table on his website which details why a single barrelled cannon will get there 1st with the mostest when compared to a gatling. greg -- In the beginning. Back in nineteen fifty-five Man didn’t know about a rock ’n’ roll show And all that jive. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:20:23 +1100, John Cook
wrote: On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 04:28:01 GMT, Chad Irby wrote: In article , (robert arndt) wrote: The M61 is a poor substitute for this bad baby: http://www.airforce-technology.com/c.../mauser21.html ...if you don't mind only firing 1,700 rounds per minute as opposed to about 6,000... Look at the spool up times ;-)... Whats the avarage gun burst time in a dogfight... Cheers John Cook Cover all the bases and use a GAU-8 ;-) Takes a bit to wind up but even those first rounds will count for something :-) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Chad Irby wrote in message om...
In article , (robert arndt) wrote: The M61 is a poor substitute for this bad baby: http://www.airforce-technology.com/c.../mauser21.html ...if you don't mind only firing 1,700 rounds per minute as opposed to about 6,000... ....when the M61 doesn't jam, that is. I prefer Mauser's BK-27 jam-proof linkless and up-coming dual feed version. BTW, in close combat 6000 rpm bursts don't mean that much. A 1,700-1,800 rpm burst of 27mm fire from the single-barrel BK-27 will ruin your day, especially with frangible ammo. Now if only the Germans could fit the amazing 30mm RMK inside the Typhoon... but I'm sure it will find its way onto the Tiger helo. Rob |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
(robert arndt) wrote:
Chad Irby wrote: (robert arndt) wrote: The M61 is a poor substitute for this bad baby: http://www.airforce-technology.com/c...r2/mauser21.ht ml ...if you don't mind only firing 1,700 rounds per minute as opposed to about 6,000... ...when the M61 doesn't jam, that is. ....which is pretty much all of the time. If the Gatling guns were prone to jamming, someone would have mentioned it sometime in the last forty or so years. I prefer Mauser's BK-27 jam-proof linkless and up-coming dual feed version. Here's a tip: No such thing as a "jam-proof" weapon that relies on ammo feed of any sort. You're been reading the Mauser PR releases too much. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AIM-54 Phoenix missile | Sujay Vijayendra | Military Aviation | 89 | November 3rd 03 09:47 PM |
P-39's, zeros, etc. | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 12 | July 23rd 03 05:48 AM |