A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

military and overseas voting



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 22nd 04, 09:11 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default military and overseas voting

The DOD has locked out the fvap.gov website in an attempt to stop
military votes. However, you can get the same information mirrored
he

http://www.overseasvote2004.com/

Looks like Rummy wants democracy everwhere but the USA. More info
he
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/0,39020330,39167419,00.htm

Please spread the word.
  #2  
Old September 23rd 04, 12:48 AM
George Ruch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

) wrote:

The DOD has locked out the fvap.gov website in an attempt to stop
military votes. However, you can get the same information mirrored
he

http://www.overseasvote2004.com/

Looks like Rummy wants democracy everwhere but the USA. More info
he
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/0,39020330,39167419,00.htm


Per the above article,
quote
Wanadoo and BT have both been hit by the blockade, according to sources
familiar with the situation, and early reports have claimed that Telefonica
and China Telecom are also hit.
/quote

If you look the amount of spam, trojans, etc. coming from these domains is
legend. Look into the conversations at net.admin.net-abuse.email and the
notices in net.admin.net-abuse.bulletins for details. The domains listed
in the article and their associated address ranges are, IIRC, block on
sight.

In short, they're protecting their network.

| George Ruch
| "Just the facts, ma'am"

  #3  
Old September 23rd 04, 07:11 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I can't interpret your gibberish. Hopefully English is a second
language for you. If not, please don't vote. You clearly are not are
not literate and thus can't be informed enough to vote wisely.

"ian maclure" wrote in message ...
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:04:01 +0000, John?]
wrote:

[snip]

Overseasvote 2004 says "Paid for by the Democratic National Committee *
430 S. Capitol St. SE, Washington DC 20003.

Meanwhile, http://fvap.gov/ works just fine for me.

Whom did you say is trying to suppress the military vote...?


Based on the recent past that would be errmmm, the Dhimmicraps!

IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

  #5  
Old September 23rd 04, 08:57 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Protecting their website? Is this like cutting down all the trees to
prevent forest fires?

Sending spam is easy. Faking email addresses is easy. Hacking website
is an order of magnitude harder. Most hacks are done by "social
engineering" the DNS to a new address. One would thing for the
fvap.gov, this could be controlled.

George Ruch wrote in message . ..
) wrote:

The DOD has locked out the fvap.gov website in an attempt to stop
military votes. However, you can get the same information mirrored
he

http://www.overseasvote2004.com/

Looks like Rummy wants democracy everwhere but the USA. More info
he
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/0,39020330,39167419,00.htm


Per the above article,
quote
Wanadoo and BT have both been hit by the blockade, according to sources
familiar with the situation, and early reports have claimed that Telefonica
and China Telecom are also hit.
/quote

If you look the amount of spam, trojans, etc. coming from these domains is
legend. Look into the conversations at net.admin.net-abuse.email and the
notices in net.admin.net-abuse.bulletins for details. The domains listed
in the article and their associated address ranges are, IIRC, block on
sight.

In short, they're protecting their network.

| George Ruch
| "Just the facts, ma'am"

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Max Cleland is CBS source for memogate Bob Coe Military Aviation 21 September 22nd 04 01:59 AM
Re : Military Blames Lap dances [email protected] Military Aviation 18 February 16th 04 07:55 PM
11 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 November 12th 03 12:58 AM
04 Sep 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 5th 03 02:57 AM
07 Aug 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 August 8th 03 02:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.