If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
User Fees are coming closer to being very real
Unless you're suggesting that the current fuel taxes would/should be
eliminated under the "User's Fee" plan? I wouldn't oppose that, philosophically, although such a tax collection system would be incredibly less efficient than the current one. That may work but I have heard no details about the "user fee" system. If they charge for weather briefings then many people will stop calkling in. If they charge for filing a flight plan then those are likely to plummet. If they charge for flight following (which I use) then expect that to drop as well. Overall a user fee is likely to decrease safety. Imagine when I fly above 00V now I talk to Springs Approach so that they know where I am and in doing so I am able to help minimize impacts to air carriers flying into COS. If they decide to charge for that I might just quit talking with them which may impact flights into COS as they divert around an unverified target. Note that I often fly higher than commercial traffic as it passes 00V. We shall see what happens. Ron Lee |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
User Fees are coming closer to being very real
That may work but I have heard no details about the "user fee" system.
If they charge for weather briefings then many people will stop calkling in. If they charge for filing a flight plan then those are likely to plummet. If they charge for flight following (which I use) then expect that to drop as well. Overall a user fee is likely to decrease safety. Precisely. Which is why (even if it starts out differently) user's fees won't be restricted to voluntary stuff. They will have to apply to mandatory things -- like takeoffs and landings -- simply because otherwise the bureaucratic economics won't add up when pilots stop using the voluntary things. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
User Fees are coming closer to being very real
Aviation has ALWAYS been a wealthy man's endeavor. In the 1950's a new
Cessna cost about what a small house cost. Same today. As for ATC, I'd hate to see user services like landing fees, but frankly, if I stay VFR, and out of D, C, or B airspace, I can fly all over the country and never even use ATC services. If they truly are so costly (and I don't think they really are, if you look at it as adding on the GA use to the airline NEED), I can do without them. I just flew Colorado to Mississippi and flew with another airplane that filed IFR and all the ATC stuff. I didn't file a flight plan or talk to ATC the whole way (I DO listen). When the ceilings looked a little low I just tuned in ASOS's from airports in front of me, and upon hearing they were 5000 AGL was encouraged that I could proceed safely. Meanwhile my buddy is getting vectored up into the clouds and around all the MOA's (I just fly throught them, never even SEEN a plane in one, it's near airports where you see planes). We both got there safely. Neither of us is right or wrong, just different ways of doing things. ..... But, yeah, aviation is an expensive endeavor. Somewhere around $100 per hour to fly the average small GA aircraft. And that is expensive fun, no matter what you compare it to, though we don't like to admit it....... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
I'm a real PILOT! | CFLav8r | Piloting | 45 | April 26th 04 03:29 PM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |