A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Drugs in the Cockpit



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 2nd 04, 04:04 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Drugs in the Cockpit



Is this an example of better living through chemistry, or does
chemically altered consciousness of pilots cause more problems than it
cures?



-------------------------------------------------------------------
AVflash Volume 10, Number 14b -- April 1, 2004
-------------------------------------------------------------------

"SMART DRUGS" ON THE WAY
A new generation of, uh, performance-enhancing drugs -- nicknamed
"V!agra for the mind" -- is in the works, and drug companies already
are looking at pilots as a potential market. According to a report in
theage.com, some in the industry are predicting these so-called "smart
drugs," which dramatically improve memory, could be on the market in
five to 10 years. "If [the drug] proves safe and effective, it could
ultimately be used by people who want to learn a language or a musical
instrument or even in schools," said Tim Tully, a professor of
genetics at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York.
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#187000

....ALZHEIMER DRUG SHOWN TO BOOST COCKPIT PERFORMANCE...
Scientists already have experimented on pilots with drugs available
today, to see if they can make us better, more alert and more
responsive. Of particular note is a test done at Stanford University
in 2002 with donepezil, which is widely used to ease the memory loss
of Alzheimer patients. It found that pilots taking donepezil performed
better in tests in a Cessna 172 simulator than those given a placebo,
and that the drug-taking pilots were particularly superior at landing
and maintaining a scan of the panel.
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#187001

....AS "GO PILLS" FUEL MILITARY PILOTS
Of course, drugs in the cockpit are nothing new. U.S. Air Force flight
surgeons frequently supply amphetamines to pilots for long flights and
in demanding combat situations -- a practice not without controversy.
Also known as "speed," and, in the military, as "go pills,"
amphetamines are considered essential by some in the military to
maintaining a top-notch fighting force. Their use was not publicly
well-known until the drugs were implicated in a friendly-fire incident
in Afghanistan in 2002, in which an American F-16 pilot mistakenly
dropped a laser-guided bomb on Canadian soldiers, killing four of
them.
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#187002

  #2  
Old April 2nd 04, 05:05 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...


Is this an example of better living through chemistry, or does
chemically altered consciousness of pilots cause more problems than it
cures?


When I first read it I thought it might be an April Fools joke.

Personally, I want to be able to learn things like in "The Matrix."


  #3  
Old April 2nd 04, 05:38 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:05:49 -0800, "C J Campbell"
wrote in Message-Id:
:


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
.. .


Is this an example of better living through chemistry, or does
chemically altered consciousness of pilots cause more problems than it
cures?


When I first read it I thought it might be an April Fools joke.


Look up Cortex Pharmaceuticals: http://www.cortexpharm.com/main.html

Personally, I want to be able to learn things like in "The Matrix."


At what cost? If the USAF's use of drugs results in frendly-fire
accidents, is it a good idea?



  #4  
Old April 2nd 04, 05:55 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

When I first read it I thought it might be an April Fools joke.


Look up Cortex Pharmaceuticals: http://www.cortexpharm.com/main.html

Personally, I want to be able to learn things like in "The Matrix."


At what cost? If the USAF's use of drugs results in frendly-fire
accidents, is it a good idea?


Has it resulted in friendly-fire accidents? Yes, there have been
friendly-fire accidents. Yes, some of those pilots have been on 'go' pills.
But I have never seen an incident where it was established that the use of
'go' pills was the primary cause or even a significant factor in the
accident. It can even be argued the heightened alertness of the pilots
actually prevents these accidents from happening more often.


  #5  
Old April 2nd 04, 07:26 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:55:46 -0800, "C J Campbell"
wrote in Message-Id:
:

Has it resulted in friendly-fire accidents? Yes, there have been
friendly-fire accidents. Yes, some of those pilots have been on 'go' pills.
But I have never seen an incident where it was established that the use of
'go' pills was the primary cause or even a significant factor in the
accident. It can even be argued the heightened alertness of the pilots
actually prevents these accidents from happening more often.


From the original article:

Also known as "speed," and, in the military, as "go pills,"
amphetamines are considered essential by some in the military to
maintaining a top-notch fighting force. Their use was not publicly
well-known until the drugs were implicated in a friendly-fire
incident in Afghanistan in 2002, in which an American F-16 pilot
mistakenly dropped a laser-guided bomb on Canadian soldiers,
killing four of them.

So while not yet an established cause of frendly-fire incidents, "go
pills" (amphetamines) seem to have been implicated as causal.


  #6  
Old April 2nd 04, 07:43 PM
Dennis O'Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ya know, of airline pilots involved in a fatal crash, in excess of 95% of
them had caffeine in their bloodstream at autopsy... Now, there is a
definite causal relationship between a drug and crashes that is being swept
under the rug - I smell a scandal here, a Pulitzer even... Where are
Bernstein and Woodworth, they must be sleeping at the switch...

Gawd I love statistics, I can prove anything!

denny
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:55:46 -0800, "C J Campbell"
wrote in Message-Id:
:

Has it resulted in friendly-fire accidents? Yes, there have been
friendly-fire accidents. Yes, some of those pilots have been on 'go'

pills.
But I have never seen an incident where it was established that the use

of
'go' pills was the primary cause or even a significant factor in the
accident. It can even be argued the heightened alertness of the pilots
actually prevents these accidents from happening more often.


From the original article:

Also known as "speed," and, in the military, as "go pills,"
amphetamines are considered essential by some in the military to
maintaining a top-notch fighting force. Their use was not publicly
well-known until the drugs were implicated in a friendly-fire
incident in Afghanistan in 2002, in which an American F-16 pilot
mistakenly dropped a laser-guided bomb on Canadian soldiers,
killing four of them.

So while not yet an established cause of frendly-fire incidents, "go
pills" (amphetamines) seem to have been implicated as causal.




  #7  
Old April 2nd 04, 08:03 PM
curious12357
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lol, I agree Dennis,

Yep, a lot of people confuse correlation with causation.

If it rained the last four times you washed your car, there's a
100% correlation between you washing your car and it raining.
But you washing your car has 0% causation.

As the old saying goes....

figures dont lie
but liars figure



On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:43:19 -0500, "Dennis O'Connor"
wrote:

Ya know, of airline pilots involved in a fatal crash, in excess of 95% of
them had caffeine in their bloodstream at autopsy... Now, there is a
definite causal relationship between a drug and crashes that is being swept
under the rug - I smell a scandal here, a Pulitzer even... Where are
Bernstein and Woodworth, they must be sleeping at the switch...

Gawd I love statistics, I can prove anything!

denny
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:55:46 -0800, "C J Campbell"
wrote in Message-Id:
:

Has it resulted in friendly-fire accidents? Yes, there have been
friendly-fire accidents. Yes, some of those pilots have been on 'go'

pills.
But I have never seen an incident where it was established that the use

of
'go' pills was the primary cause or even a significant factor in the
accident. It can even be argued the heightened alertness of the pilots
actually prevents these accidents from happening more often.


From the original article:

Also known as "speed," and, in the military, as "go pills,"
amphetamines are considered essential by some in the military to
maintaining a top-notch fighting force. Their use was not publicly
well-known until the drugs were implicated in a friendly-fire
incident in Afghanistan in 2002, in which an American F-16 pilot
mistakenly dropped a laser-guided bomb on Canadian soldiers,
killing four of them.

So while not yet an established cause of frendly-fire incidents, "go
pills" (amphetamines) seem to have been implicated as causal.




  #8  
Old April 3rd 04, 02:30 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
At what cost? If the USAF's use of drugs results in frendly-fire
accidents, is it a good idea?


Has it resulted in friendly-fire accidents? Yes, there have been
friendly-fire accidents. Yes, some of those pilots have been on 'go'

pills.
But I have never seen an incident where it was established that the use of
'go' pills was the primary cause or even a significant factor in the
accident. It can even be argued the heightened alertness of the pilots
actually prevents these accidents from happening more often.


http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#187002



  #9  
Old April 3rd 04, 08:00 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:55:46 -0800, "C J Campbell"
wrote in Message-Id:
:

Has it resulted in friendly-fire accidents? Yes, there have been
friendly-fire accidents. Yes, some of those pilots have been on 'go'

pills.
But I have never seen an incident where it was established that the use

of
'go' pills was the primary cause or even a significant factor in the
accident. It can even be argued the heightened alertness of the pilots
actually prevents these accidents from happening more often.


From the original article:

Also known as "speed," and, in the military, as "go pills,"
amphetamines are considered essential by some in the military to
maintaining a top-notch fighting force. Their use was not publicly
well-known until the drugs were implicated in a friendly-fire
incident in Afghanistan in 2002, in which an American F-16 pilot
mistakenly dropped a laser-guided bomb on Canadian soldiers,
killing four of them.

So while not yet an established cause of frendly-fire incidents, "go
pills" (amphetamines) seem to have been implicated as causal.


The trouble is that even AVweb has not said how these drugs were implicated.
In the incident they cite, the pilots were using 'go' pills. Nothing in the
investigation has shown any causal relationship with the accident. You might
as well say that the pilots' helmets or the fillings of their teeth were
implicated.


  #10  
Old April 3rd 04, 08:02 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
At what cost? If the USAF's use of drugs results in frendly-fire
accidents, is it a good idea?


Has it resulted in friendly-fire accidents? Yes, there have been
friendly-fire accidents. Yes, some of those pilots have been on 'go'

pills.
But I have never seen an incident where it was established that the use

of
'go' pills was the primary cause or even a significant factor in the
accident. It can even be argued the heightened alertness of the pilots
actually prevents these accidents from happening more often.


http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#187002


Ah. Because AVweb says they were implicated, they must have caused the
accident. Wouldn't be the first time that AVweb has gone out on a limb and
sawed it off.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
backup cockpit lighting Josef Burger Instrument Flight Rules 35 January 2nd 05 01:23 AM
Antonov vs Galaxy cockpit Emilio Military Aviation 13 July 2nd 04 06:15 AM
Fake Cockpit Flubke Military Aviation 6 June 16th 04 03:16 PM
What are you guys using for cockpit lights these days? Stealth Pilot Home Built 6 December 9th 03 09:14 AM
New Film: The Need For Speed - Going to war on drugs Phil Carpenter Military Aviation 0 July 23rd 03 07:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.