A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Russians cool, but Europe warms to U.S. space plan



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 17th 04, 11:49 PM
Yama
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Russians cool, but Europe warms to U.S. space plan


"Michael Petukhov" wrote in message
om...
But Mikhailichenko dismissed any suggestion of a return to the Cold
War contest which Soviet Union led until the United States put men on
the moon in 1969. He said the Russian space programme, short of cash
since the collapse of Soviet Union in 1991, would continue its own
research and this would form the basis for future missions. "Such
plans in Russia are still being formulated. Realistic plans will come
to light by the end of this year or the beginning of next year," he
said without giving details.


Well lets hope so, because at the moment Russia does not HAVE scientific
space program outside of ISS, in which they provide like 2% of the funding.
Unfortunate, really.


  #2  
Old January 18th 04, 01:22 AM
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Yama" wrote in message
...

"Michael Petukhov" wrote in message
om...
But Mikhailichenko dismissed any suggestion of a return to the Cold
War contest which Soviet Union led until the United States put men on
the moon in 1969. He said the Russian space programme, short of cash
since the collapse of Soviet Union in 1991, would continue its own
research and this would form the basis for future missions. "Such
plans in Russia are still being formulated. Realistic plans will come
to light by the end of this year or the beginning of next year," he
said without giving details.


Well lets hope so, because at the moment Russia does not HAVE scientific
space program outside of ISS, in which they provide like 2% of the

funding.
Unfortunate, really.



But the ISS has no real mission. They do an expirament once in a while to
justify having it. If it had been designed as an orbiting warehouse, it
would have a purpose...stockpiling supplies in advance of a mission to Mars.

If you're going to go to Mars, you have to have enough supplies to get
there, land, wander around, take off and fly back home. Sending supplies
directly to Mars is a possibility but if your rendezvous fails, you're
finished. So stock piling the supplies in Earth orbit makes the most sense.


  #3  
Old January 18th 04, 03:01 AM
Captain!
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Buffy the Vampire Slayer" wrote in message
.net...

"Yama" wrote in message
...

"Michael Petukhov" wrote in message
om...
But Mikhailichenko dismissed any suggestion of a return to the Cold
War contest which Soviet Union led until the United States put men on
the moon in 1969. He said the Russian space programme, short of cash
since the collapse of Soviet Union in 1991, would continue its own
research and this would form the basis for future missions. "Such
plans in Russia are still being formulated. Realistic plans will come
to light by the end of this year or the beginning of next year," he
said without giving details.


Well lets hope so, because at the moment Russia does not HAVE scientific
space program outside of ISS, in which they provide like 2% of the

funding.
Unfortunate, really.



But the ISS has no real mission. They do an expirament once in a while to
justify having it. If it had been designed as an orbiting warehouse, it
would have a purpose...stockpiling supplies in advance of a mission to

Mars.

If you're going to go to Mars, you have to have enough supplies to get
there, land, wander around, take off and fly back home. Sending supplies
directly to Mars is a possibility but if your rendezvous fails, you're
finished. So stock piling the supplies in Earth orbit makes the most

sense.



that's not a bad idea, but i am sure that it could be done at a lower cost.
the iss is a status symbol. it always has been. and it's a damn good one
too.


  #4  
Old January 18th 04, 04:28 AM
Fred J. McCall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Buffy the Vampire Slayer" wrote:

:But the ISS has no real mission. They do an expirament once in a while to
:justify having it. If it had been designed as an orbiting warehouse, it
:would have a purpose...stockpiling supplies in advance of a mission to Mars.
:
:If you're going to go to Mars, you have to have enough supplies to get
:there, land, wander around, take off and fly back home. Sending supplies
:directly to Mars is a possibility but if your rendezvous fails, you're
:finished. So stock piling the supplies in Earth orbit makes the most sense.

True, but you don't need a space station for that. It's space. Space
is big. Really, really big. And stuff you hang there will, in the
short term, pretty much stay where you leave it whether there's a
space station there or not.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Space Elevator Big John Home Built 111 July 21st 04 04:31 PM
OT (sorta): Bush Will Announce New Space Missions Dav1936531 Military Aviation 0 January 9th 04 10:34 AM
for mr. pethukov ( Bush May Announce Return To Moon At Kitty Hawk) captain! Military Aviation 6 October 30th 03 05:11 PM
Strategic Command Missions Rely on Space Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 30th 03 09:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.