A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sorry, Spruce and Jim Irwin



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old October 12th 03, 11:35 PM
Bernie the Bunion
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Big John wrote:

If the individual in question would come to Texas and mouth off, there
are lots who would love to 'clean his clock'.

These are big 6' 6", 250 lb, individuals who crush beer cans with one
pinky.


Yah Yah Yah..... And my father used to eat light bulbs.

How do I know..... Well sometimes when ma and pa went to bed
I could hear him say turn out the light honey, and I'll eat it.
  #62  
Old October 12th 03, 11:40 PM
Bernie the Bunion
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Big John wrote:

This thread got away OT from LL's posts and rants.


Three days, and a dozen or so - I'm bigger than you are posts,
and you finally figured it out.

Well boys...... It's the thanksgiving weekend here up in Canada
and although I would normally be promoting tasty Alberta beef,
today it's a big tom turkey in the oven.

Now hows that for an OT post.
  #63  
Old October 12th 03, 11:56 PM
Larry Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Big John" wrote in message
...
BOb

[...]
For one who has traded hostile fire with the enemy I resent the
"Pussy's" who belittle my participation in armed combat for the US. If
you have not stood alone out there and been shot at, keep your mouth
shut about combat and those of us who guaranteed your right to mouth
off in RAH.


Huh? You guarantee my right to post in RAH? Then want my ticket pulled
for getting saucy? Laughable.

State your last name, your rank, branch, and unit. Otherwise , stfu.

The only real threats communicated here were the ones you made against Bill
Phillips and me. And he slapped you around and stuck his finger in your
eye. If you don't like my ticket, file your complaint, fascist ratfink.

Many of us here are building airplanes and we fly them too. You are here,
not because you are capable of building an aircraft, or of flying, but to
stick out your chest and say, "Oh, looky here at me and what a hero I am for
my country. I flew P-51's and blahblahblah!" Well that, in and of itself
is OK, I guess, as long as you are who you say you are (which I am beginning
to doubt), and as long as you are not in sympathy with the very tyranny you
say you fought against. Twice now you have belied yourself as a sort of
hypocrite. You remind me of the little whispering *******s spawned by Joe
McCarthy and his ilk. If tattling and snitching are favorite activities of
yours, don't you have the balls to do them yourself?

Just remember that the laws of libel and defamation still exist as a redress
against liars.

Today, after treating the battery box against corrosion, I installed that
Gill battery (which did not come from ACS, btw, in the 172, pulled on the
master and the switch and saw that it had plenty of juice to turn the prop.
Tomorrow we'll fire up the engine, and soon we'll fly the airplane. I'm
installing an aileron bellcrank stop in the left wing, which has not been
there since the early nineties, and replacing the broken window latch on the
pilot's side. Why don't you get your worthless ass out to the airport and
get some work done too. Or start on the tail of an RV-10.

And by the way, wtf is a "Physco exam"?



  #64  
Old October 12th 03, 11:57 PM
Jerry Springer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Big John wrote:


Also, since I don't support what the individual in question advocates,
the passing of his 'rants' to authorities who might be able to take
appropriate action seems to me to be fully justified, since he appears
to be a danger to himself and others. As a American sworn to support
the Constitution and the Laws of the US, it is my duty, even though I
am in a Retired status and not on active duty to prevent threats of
physical harm to others to be ignored. My Retired status (and pay)
allows the government to recall me at any time to active duty if
needed.


The more you write the dumber you appear.


For one who has traded hostile fire with the enemy I resent the
"Pussy's" who belittle my participation in armed combat for the US. If
you have not stood alone out there and been shot at, keep your mouth
shut about combat and those of us who guaranteed your right to mouth
off in RAH.

I guess I can call you anything I please according to your reasoning,
as i have been fired upon in Vietnam. Does that make me special? NO just
like it dose not mean anything about you either other than you are
living in the past and your whole life was lived by someone else telling
you what to do and when to do it. So don't try the service card here on me.
You might live in Texas but you would not get along well with people I
know with your "lets report them" attitude. People like you are
destroying this country.

Jerry

  #65  
Old October 13th 03, 12:10 AM
Model Flyer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Big John" wrote in message
...
Do they let people with the 'Road Rage' expressed on this thread

fly
airplanes?

It might be a good idea to send the postings on this thread to OK

City
and let them require a Physco exam at the next physical.

They won't let me fly with a pacemaker, but let people like this

fly,
Sheeesh!

Big John


Don't think you should worry too much, they are really quite normal
all of them, they fly under control but come to this ng to let off
steam, as you did.:-) Sheesh and there go I.
--

..
--
Cheers,
Jonathan Lowe
whatever at antispam dot net
No email address given because of spam.
Antispam trap in place



On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:25:22 -0400, "Larry Smith"
wrote:


"Speaking of Morons" wrote in

message
om...
Jerry Springer wrote:

Another good reason to not use ACS. This is the second time Mr

Irwin
has posted personal information to this Newsgroup. The guy is

a moron.

Oh Really....blah,blah,blah


I'll use this NG to call down a bum supplier any time I take a

notion, and
if you don't like it, anonymous coward, show yourself, and we'll

meet eye to
eye, arm to arm, and brow to brow. Then we'll see how brave you

are. In
the meantime you are a slimy little yellow-belly.




  #66  
Old October 13th 03, 03:17 AM
Barnyard BOb --
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Big John wrote:

BOb

I have jumped back to this posting prior to answering some of your and
others questions.

I mentioned "Race Card" talking about the Germans who were being
discussed. Not all Germans were Nazi's and supported the things Hitler
did. Not all Germans were 'bad guys'.

As you can read, YOU immediately jumped in and used the term "JEWS"
(not me).


(balanced snipped)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

For Pete's sake --

CAUCASIAN is a RACE
ORIENTAL is a RACE
INDY 500 is a RACE

BUT...

JEWS are NOT a race.
GERMANS are NOT a race.

All you do is continue to muddy the waters.
Soooo...

Enough of this tit for tat crap.
Others can make up their own minds about you,
but... I know fascism when I trip over it.


Barnyard BOb -- over 50 years of flight


  #67  
Old October 13th 03, 06:40 AM
Ken Sandyeggo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Barnyard BOb -- wrote in message . ..
Big John wrote:

BOb

I have jumped back to this posting prior to answering some of your and
others questions.

I mentioned "Race Card" talking about the Germans who were being
discussed. Not all Germans were Nazi's and supported the things Hitler
did. Not all Germans were 'bad guys'.

As you can read, YOU immediately jumped in and used the term "JEWS"
(not me).


(balanced snipped)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

For Pete's sake --

CAUCASIAN is a RACE
ORIENTAL is a RACE
INDY 500 is a RACE

BUT...

JEWS are NOT a race.
GERMANS are NOT a race.



Um, Bob.....oriental now refers to a furniture or rug style or
designating the Orient. Per my American Heritage dictionary, "The
term Asian is now preferred for persons of South and East Asian
ancestry in place of the term Oriental, an older usage." I know we're
old, but we need to keep up with modern usage.

Ken J. - Sandy, egg ho

"Over 60 years of putting up with other people's ****"



All you do is continue to muddy the waters.
Soooo...

Enough of this tit for tat crap.
Others can make up their own minds about you,
but... I know fascism when I trip over it.


Barnyard BOb -- over 50 years of flight

  #68  
Old October 13th 03, 06:49 AM
Ken Sandyeggo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Barnyard BOb -- wrote in message . ..
Big John wrote:

BOb

I have jumped back to this posting prior to answering some of your and
others questions.

I mentioned "Race Card" talking about the Germans who were being
discussed. Not all Germans were Nazi's and supported the things Hitler
did. Not all Germans were 'bad guys'.

As you can read, YOU immediately jumped in and used the term "JEWS"
(not me).


(balanced snipped)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

For Pete's sake --

CAUCASIAN is a RACE
ORIENTAL is a RACE
INDY 500 is a RACE

BUT...

JEWS are NOT a race.
GERMANS are NOT a race.


Um, Bob.....oriental now refers to a furniture or rug style or
designating the Orient. Per my American Heritage dictionary, "The
term Asian is now preferred for persons of South and East Asian
ancestry in place of the term Oriental, an older usage." I know we're
old, but we need to keep up with modern usage.

Ken J. - Sandy, egg ho

"Over 60 years of putting up with other people's ****"









All you do is continue to muddy the waters.
Soooo...

Enough of this tit for tat crap.
Others can make up their own minds about you,
but... I know fascism when I trip over it.


Barnyard BOb -- over 50 years of flight

  #70  
Old October 14th 03, 12:33 AM
Yoram Leshinski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 13:00:32 -0500, Barnyard BOb --
wrote:


Yoram Leshinski wrote:

BOb

I think that Big John was right alluding to Road Rage in response to
Larchless' comment. Road Rage is, in my book, if I stop my car, jump
out and challenge you to come out too (and maybe take it farther from
there if you come out). Saying to someone, over the internet, come out
to meet me face to face is just the same. OK, so maybe it is not Road
Rage but Internet Rage. :-)


There are many posts.
As an untrained psychologist or psychiatrist....
Which posts do you specifically know to qualify as RAGE
and worthy of being forwarded to the FAA?


On 10/10/2003 Larry Smith wrote


I'll use this NG to call down a bum supplier any time I take a notion,
and if you don't like it, anonymous coward, show yourself, and we'll
meet eye to eye, arm to arm, and brow to brow. Then we'll see how
brave you are. In the meantime you are a slimy little yellow-belly.

That's the post I was refering to.


OTOH, referring to snitching in the same breath as the Nazis is a bit
far fetched. If snitching is so close to the Nazis that it runs
Goosebumps down your spine what would you say to the Snitch law that
is in force in every State, I think, and/or federally.


More far fetched, IMO, is Big John advising readers here to
turn each other in to the FAA for posts he deems should
target pilots for possible grounding.


I agree that asking people to call the FAA after someone posting
something on/in the news groups is plain and simple dumm. I remember
somebody writing in the past that he will tell the FAA that people
flew at the flyin in Pinkneeville (SP) and as evidance all he had was
writings posted here. I was unhappy about it then as I was now when
Big John suggested it.


What "Snitch law(s)"?
Again, please be specific and where it
applies to speech of RAH posters.


Well, I'm not a lawyer and I don't know the specifics but I was
refering to the law that protect snitchers from getting fired and the
other one (or was it the same law?) that give snitchers some money
reward (10%?) if they report some money waste or somthing like it.
Again I'm no lawyer, so please refer to one about the exact details.
g


My comment above does not endorse or condem Latchless and his action
or Jim Irwin.


So, unlike Big John, you would not have certain pilots here
be snitched on to the government and be subjected to having
their flying privileges revoked if Big Brother took a mind to?


I read the above three times and I still didn't get your meaning. Do
you think we should snitch or not? Maybe I'm, just as Latchless said,
not very bright. g

Hmmmm....
Still, it may be a "good idea" to keep an eye on you, too. g


Join the club. g


Barnyard BOb ---



Yoram (a bit dim) Leshinski
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.