A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Certified logger altitude recording?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 5th 18, 08:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 190
Default Certified logger altitude recording?

How do current certified loggers determine altitude? Being some are plumbed to external pitot/static and some are cockpit pressure only, what differences are expected?

Does your mechanical altimeter (especially 57mm size) read close to your "glide caculator" altitude?

Are loggers solely dependent on pressure altitudes or is GPS altitude comparison ever included in the algorithms?

Seems one would be more likely to "bust" min/max altitudes using cockpit pressure loggers.
  #2  
Old March 5th 18, 09:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Godfrey (QT)[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 321
Default Certified logger altitude recording?

On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 2:48:06 PM UTC-5, wrote:
How do current certified loggers determine altitude? Being some are plumbed to external pitot/static and some are cockpit pressure only, what differences are expected?

Does your mechanical altimeter (especially 57mm size) read close to your "glide caculator" altitude?

Are loggers solely dependent on pressure altitudes or is GPS altitude comparison ever included in the algorithms?

Seems one would be more likely to "bust" min/max altitudes using cockpit pressure loggers.


IGC data loggers record an uncorrected (29.92 assumed) pressure altitude in an integer number of meters. They may also record a GPS altitude as a separate item. Scoring software calculates a fixed correction based on the known surface height at takeoff that is applied throughout the flight. A correction computed at landing is used in the US at the finish if more favorable.

In the US competition environment, GPS altitude is not considered unless baro altitude is not available from the logger (i.e. it is not an IGC logger but is an IGC "position recorder").

If the logger is not plumbed to the aircraft static, meaningful differences can occur between your "steam gauge" altimeter and the logger. This is a function of how your cockpit pressure varies up or down relative to outside (mostly) with airspeed.

Differences also occur because the calibration curves of the "steam gauge" and the IGC logger are not the same.

Knowing how to monitor (while flying) the actual baro altitude being recorded in you logger is a very worthwhile endeavor and not always easy depending on your equipment.

This difference bites folks most often in two ways:
1. Busting the 17,500 or 17,900 MSL ceiling of airspace
2. Being too high or too low when crossing the finish cylinder boundary

Hope this helps.

Scorer with the scars to prove it,
QT
  #3  
Old March 5th 18, 09:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan Daly[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 718
Default Certified logger altitude recording?

On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 2:48:06 PM UTC-5, wrote:
How do current certified loggers determine altitude? Being some are plumbed to external pitot/static and some are cockpit pressure only, what differences are expected?

Does your mechanical altimeter (especially 57mm size) read close to your "glide caculator" altitude?

Are loggers solely dependent on pressure altitudes or is GPS altitude comparison ever included in the algorithms?

Seems one would be more likely to "bust" min/max altitudes using cockpit pressure loggers.


Read chapter 4 "pressure altitude recording" of http://www.ukiws.demon.co.uk/GFAC/do..._spec_gnss.pdf for the first question. If you check the Flight Recorder approval documents, they say, for example, for PowerFLARM: "The recorder case is not pressure-sealed and "cockpit static" pressure is recorded on the IGC file." For CNv-IGC (which you might assume uses plumbed static pressure) it is the same (not pressure sealed, "cockpit static" is recorded. An assertion that some FRs use plumbed sources is incorrect (you can go through the 59 Approval Documents if you want to check your specific one at http://www.ukiws.demon.co.uk/GFAC/igc_approved_frs.pdf ).

Second has nothing to do with flight recorders since you put QNH into glide computer and altimeter (neither are FRs; Flight Recorders use QNE as a reference). Mine agree reasonably closely (50' or so) since I had my winter altimeter (57 mm) recalibrated at the factory. They recommend every couple of years. Before calibration - many hundreds of feet out. I find my V3 vario (set QNH) and CNv Flight Recorder (set QNH) read very closely to each other..

Third: Pressure alt to 15,000m/49,213'; above, approved "High Altitude Flight Recorder", see Sporting Code 3b, Chapter 2.1. http://www.ukiws.demon.co..uk/GFAC/d...sc3b(2015).pdf .

Last question - mentioned in Grand Prix threads - open cockpit vents at start (max alt), close cockpit vents on Vne finish (min alt). Minor pressurization effect, but harsh penalty after 5m in GP. You could do a couple of tows and do short final glide at Vne with vents open on the first, closed on second, to determine whether it's worth it to you. The effects are essentially the same for all finishes (around same speed, around same altitude) so it balances out somewhat. The altitudes are compared to the baseline altitude after landing too.

Dan
  #4  
Old March 5th 18, 09:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Godfrey (QT)[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 321
Default Certified logger altitude recording?

On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 2:48:06 PM UTC-5, wrote:
How do current certified loggers determine altitude? Being some are plumbed to external pitot/static and some are cockpit pressure only, what differences are expected?

Does your mechanical altimeter (especially 57mm size) read close to your "glide caculator" altitude?

Are loggers solely dependent on pressure altitudes or is GPS altitude comparison ever included in the algorithms?

Seems one would be more likely to "bust" min/max altitudes using cockpit pressure loggers.


IGC data loggers record an uncorrected (29.92 assumed) pressure altitude in an integer number of meters. They may also record a GPS altitude as a separate item. Scoring software calculates a fixed correction based on the known surface height at takeoff that is applied throughout the flight. A correction computed at landing is used in the US at the finish if more favorable.

In the US competition environment, GPS altitude is not considered unless baro altitude is not available from the logger (i.e. it is not an IGC logger but is an IGC "position recorder").

If the logger is not plumbed to the aircraft static, meaningful differences can occur between your "steam gauge" altimeter and the logger. This is a function of how your cockpit pressure varies up or down relative to outside (mostly) with airspeed.

Differences also occur because the calibration curves of the "steam gauge" and the IGC logger are not the same.

Knowing how to monitor (while flying) the corrected-to-takeoff-elevation baro altitude being recorded in you logger is a very worthwhile endeavor and not always easy depending on your equipment.

This difference bites folks most often in two ways:
1. Busting the 17,500 or 17,900 MSL ceiling of airspace
2. Being too high or too low when crossing the finish cylinder boundary

Hope this helps.

Scorer with the scars to prove it,
QT
  #5  
Old March 5th 18, 09:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Papa3[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 753
Default Certified logger altitude recording?

John beat me to the punch.

But FWIW, the IGC approval document for each recorder gives details of the altitude recording mechanism including what sensors are used and how the system obtains pressure. From what I recall, many (most) FRs do not have a sealed case, so the pressure reading is "cockpit static". Those with the appropriate understanding and mindset might use this for transient advantage in a very specific situation.

P3

https://www.fai.org/page/igc-approved-flight-recorders


On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 3:36:00 PM UTC-5, John Godfrey (QT) wrote:
On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 2:48:06 PM UTC-5, wrote:
How do current certified loggers determine altitude? Being some are plumbed to external pitot/static and some are cockpit pressure only, what differences are expected?

Does your mechanical altimeter (especially 57mm size) read close to your "glide caculator" altitude?

Are loggers solely dependent on pressure altitudes or is GPS altitude comparison ever included in the algorithms?

Seems one would be more likely to "bust" min/max altitudes using cockpit pressure loggers.


IGC data loggers record an uncorrected (29.92 assumed) pressure altitude in an integer number of meters. They may also record a GPS altitude as a separate item. Scoring software calculates a fixed correction based on the known surface height at takeoff that is applied throughout the flight. A correction computed at landing is used in the US at the finish if more favorable.

In the US competition environment, GPS altitude is not considered unless baro altitude is not available from the logger (i.e. it is not an IGC logger but is an IGC "position recorder").

If the logger is not plumbed to the aircraft static, meaningful differences can occur between your "steam gauge" altimeter and the logger. This is a function of how your cockpit pressure varies up or down relative to outside (mostly) with airspeed.

Differences also occur because the calibration curves of the "steam gauge" and the IGC logger are not the same.

Knowing how to monitor (while flying) the corrected-to-takeoff-elevation baro altitude being recorded in you logger is a very worthwhile endeavor and not always easy depending on your equipment.

This difference bites folks most often in two ways:
1. Busting the 17,500 or 17,900 MSL ceiling of airspace
2. Being too high or too low when crossing the finish cylinder boundary

Hope this helps.

Scorer with the scars to prove it,
QT


  #6  
Old March 6th 18, 03:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
jfitch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,134
Default Certified logger altitude recording?

On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 11:48:06 AM UTC-8, wrote:
How do current certified loggers determine altitude? Being some are plumbed to external pitot/static and some are cockpit pressure only, what differences are expected?

Does your mechanical altimeter (especially 57mm size) read close to your "glide caculator" altitude?

Are loggers solely dependent on pressure altitudes or is GPS altitude comparison ever included in the algorithms?

Seems one would be more likely to "bust" min/max altitudes using cockpit pressure loggers.


As a sanity check, full pitot pressure at 60 knots is around 0.085 psi. A foot of altitude depends on altitude but call it 0.0004 psi below 18,000 ft. So if you could get full dynamic pressure in the cockpit at 60 knots your recorder would be off by 200 ft. It should actually be a small fraction of that.
  #7  
Old March 7th 18, 08:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 56
Default Certified logger altitude recording?

Scoring software calculates a fixed correction based on the known surface height at takeoff that is applied throughout the flight. A correction computed at landing is used in the US at the finish if more favorable.

Right, so in the US, the "Scoring Software" has to compute, track and manage 4 altitude values:

1) GPS Altitude
2) Raw Pressure Altitude
3) Pressure Altitude corrected with takeoff roll
4) Pressure Altitude corrected with landing roll

And know when and where each one is applicable, and present those results transparently to the official scorer and contestant.
  #8  
Old March 8th 18, 06:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Godfrey (QT)[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 321
Default Certified logger altitude recording?

On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 2:58:36 PM UTC-5, wrote:
Scoring software calculates a fixed correction based on the known surface height at takeoff that is applied throughout the flight. A correction computed at landing is used in the US at the finish if more favorable.


Right, so in the US, the "Scoring Software" has to compute, track and manage 4 altitude values:

1) GPS Altitude
2) Raw Pressure Altitude
3) Pressure Altitude corrected with takeoff roll
4) Pressure Altitude corrected with landing roll

And know when and where each one is applicable, and present those results transparently to the official scorer and contestant.


This is true US or otherwise. The only twist in the US rules is the calculation of a second correct number at landing.

Significantly easier in the USA is the absence of airspace ceilings based on flight levels. Everything in the USA is MSL.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cautionary Tale: Logger Failures, Batteries, Backups, & GPS Altitude Chip Bearden Soaring 9 October 16th 07 04:44 PM
Cautionary Tale: Logger Failures, Batteries, Backups, & GPS Altitude Chip Bearden Soaring 2 October 15th 07 07:18 PM
Non-certified parts for a certified plane? Dico Owning 10 August 22nd 06 03:11 AM
Vector altitude for ILS below GS intercept altitude? M Instrument Flight Rules 23 May 20th 06 07:41 PM
Accident Statistics: Certified vs. Non-Certified Engines Ron Wanttaja Home Built 23 January 18th 04 06:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.