If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, Guy Alcala
confessed the following: Oh, I've always wanted to roll over and rat someone out to the feds! With my luck I'll get classified as an enemy combatant -- being a Northern California native probably qualifies me in the eyes of this administration ;-) Of course we know that Guy Alcala is simply a clever play on words, Al-Guycala (the extra c-a is merely a form of phonetic MIJI) hence Al-Guyla (say it fast, kinda slurred) is pretty darn close to al-Quada, ergo you are a spy. If Saddam Hussein had ties to al-Qaeda, by golly you clearly do too. Kindly turn over your WMD. And to think I believed that reading and analysing data from open sources was a completely legal activity in this country. Subversive! Thinking...there'll be none of that. OTOH, the USAF supposedly made the attempt to classify Maxwell's equations some years back (stealth, don't you know), which would have been an interesting exercise in ex-post facto censorship. You've given me an idea, maybe I can sell Avagadro's number (he was a Mole afterall) and Planck's constant on e-Bay. Juvat |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
In article , fudog50
wrote: You're right, I'll give it a rest,,,there is nothing classified,,, like I said sensitive maybe,,just a normal reaction to this stuff due to years on the pointy end during the cold war,,,try to post that stuff in the 80's,,, While it may be that you feel you are free to post any kind of sensitive **** on here because of an ego thing, and it is totally unclassified,,,just remember, our friends used to be our enemies, and just as fast as it changed,,, it could change again. Like I said,,,just another piece of the puzzle. Go ahead and keep showing the world how CONOPS are performed in a military ATC environment and the pattern of the COMMS, very smart. "Military" is the key word here, and if you still feel it's ok to post to the world our military Comms during a time of war, then keep going, then we will see who's side you are on. You seem to forget that "usenet" is the entire world, not just some people here in the states you are trying to impress. You may or may not be aware of what an intelligence analyst will actually do with such open source data. Having been in that role, were I assigned to characterize US military operating procedures, and found these posts, I'd start by asking some of the following questions: 1. Is Guy Alcala actually what he claims to be, or is this a US disinformation operation posting slightly-altered-from-reality data intended to confuse OSINT (Open Source Intelligence)? 2. If he is who he purports to be, does his monitoring cover a statistically significant part of the operational period? By relying on his data, might I come up with an accurate picture of US communications procedures for the times when he is at home and not sleeping? Or, might I wind up making assumptions for late night operations -- which the US _loves_ -- based on his obervation during more sensible hours? 3. How valuable is accurate data? If I just want to familiarize my people with what US communications sound like, it may be adequate. If, however, there's a critical need -- we plan to disrupt operational communications in a future operation -- is OSINT the correct way to go? This is the "collection guidance" problem -- what is the best means to gather the data for a requirement laid upon me? If OSINT from one source (Guy) isn't enough, are there enough bobbyists posting from other locations that I can build an adequate mosaic from OSINT? Should I dedicate COMINT resources? How much human skill is needed to do the intercepts? Could I get away with a one-time infiltration of a programmable radio receiver, which creates audio files and transmits them steganographically to my processing center? Do I need to infiltrate an innocent-appearing person to, say, be a retiree in Florida [1] that has a hobby of radio listening, and then again securely sends me his findings? [1] Obviously a very poor cover identity for Florida...NOT. Much easier to have someone in this role, perhaps posing as a retired Canadian rug store salesman that is now a snowbird, rather than a tough- looking robed and daggered fedayeen The bottom line is that even if I were a hostile intelligence analyst, I might rationally decide not to use his data, or use it for background only. There are other ways to get the information, perhaps with greater risk and expense, but also more accuracy or statistical significance. One subtle point is that TOO MUCH open source information may be as great a handicap, to foreign analysts, than too little. If they have to spend a great deal of time evaluating the reliability and coverage of the OSINT, it just may be simpler to do COMINT. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Robey Price wrote:
After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, Guy Alcala confessed the following: Oh, I've always wanted to roll over and rat someone out to the feds! With my luck I'll get classified as an enemy combatant -- being a Northern California native probably qualifies me in the eyes of this administration ;-) Of course we know that Guy Alcala is simply a clever play on words, Al-Guycala (the extra c-a is merely a form of phonetic MIJI) hence Al-Guyla (say it fast, kinda slurred) is pretty darn close to al-Quada, ergo you are a spy. If Saddam Hussein had ties to al-Qaeda, by golly you clearly do too. Kindly turn over your WMD. Gasp! I knew I never should have talked on my cell phone about going to the hardware store to restock my stash of Weed-B-Gone. You've figured out the code, Infidel Dog! Allah curse you! And to think I believed that reading and analysing data from open sources was a completely legal activity in this country. Subversive! Thinking...there'll be none of that. Well, I must confess I received my early training in critical thinking in that hotbed of revolutionary training, the California public primary and secondary school system of the 1960s and '70s. These 'madrassas' clearly had to be stamped out if we're ever to win the war on terror. Fortunately for the American way of life, over the last thirty years, through a combination of political correctness, grade inflation and the effects of Prop. 13 on school budgets, we've been successful in de-emphasizing the use of logic and reasoning skills, and indeed almost all forms of debate that doesn't involve shouting at each other, waving signs or suing. Take that, secular humanist zealots! OTOH, the USAF supposedly made the attempt to classify Maxwell's equations some years back (stealth, don't you know), which would have been an interesting exercise in ex-post facto censorship. You've given me an idea, maybe I can sell Avagadro's number (he was a Mole afterall) and Planck's constant on e-Bay. You have to give potential buyers a tease -- just to whet their appetite, tell them what a coulomb is for free, just to establish your bona fides. As for Avogadro, tell them it's about 6.02 x 10^* -- they get to know what "*" is after you get confirmation that the (cue Dr. Evil voice) "One Million D . . ." (sound of No. 2 clearing his throat), "er, I mean One Hundred Billion Dollars!", is safely in your numbered account (in the Caymans). You'll probably have to settle for somewhere between $100,000,000 and $1 billion, but when you go to pick it up, the best way for you to be inconspicuous is to drop the hint that you're the CEO, CFO, etc. of some multi-billion dollar American company that has gone into bankruptcy after the discovery of massive fraud by the corporate executives, and that you're fleeing the country ahead of a likely indictment. Given the hundreds if not thousands of people they see every week with the same story, it's unlikely that they'll remember anything special about you. Guy |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Howard Berkowitz wrote:
In article , fudog50 wrote: You're right, I'll give it a rest,,,there is nothing classified,,, like I said sensitive maybe,,just a normal reaction to this stuff due to years on the pointy end during the cold war,,,try to post that stuff in the 80's,,, While it may be that you feel you are free to post any kind of sensitive **** on here because of an ego thing, and it is totally unclassified,,,just remember, our friends used to be our enemies, and just as fast as it changed,,, it could change again. Like I said,,,just another piece of the puzzle. Go ahead and keep showing the world how CONOPS are performed in a military ATC environment and the pattern of the COMMS, very smart. "Military" is the key word here, and if you still feel it's ok to post to the world our military Comms during a time of war, then keep going, then we will see who's side you are on. You seem to forget that "usenet" is the entire world, not just some people here in the states you are trying to impress. You may or may not be aware of what an intelligence analyst will actually do with such open source data. Having been in that role, were I assigned to characterize US military operating procedures, and found these posts, I'd start by asking some of the following questions: 1. Is Guy Alcala actually what he claims to be, or is this a US disinformation operation posting slightly-altered-from-reality data intended to confuse OSINT (Open Source Intelligence)? snip No, no, no! I'm the TECHINT guy, not the COMINT one. It's that Stern character you mean (h'mm, Stern. It's probably a false flag, trying to make us think he's being run by the Israelis. Clever plan, though; using a radio scanner that anyone can buy from a Sporty's catalog to listen in to unscrambled US military aviation comms -- it's ingenious. None of our enemies would ever think of it). Guy |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
I suppose that my distress at following OPSEC apparently only
applies to us military folks. I guess it is ok for civilians to violate "OPSEC' during time of war? (whether you agree or not, we are at war, where is your patriotism? Why make it any easier for any potential enemy?) Wouldn't it be horrible if the enemy used even a miniscule part of your military A/C comms to add into a tactical strike? It's your conscience now, can you live with it if even a minute piece of your posting of CONOPS is used to plan an attack? I'll give it rest,,,,just think twice about posting military CONOPS during time of war,,,again,,you are 100% in violation of current "OPSEC" guidelines. On 21 May 2004 17:53:52 -0700, (miso) wrote: It's really sad that they are still running single engine Cessna's in the war on drugs given we lost two such planes in Columbia and US citizens are still being held hostage from one of the crashes. I wasn't aware the US had any of those Caravans registered in their own name, rather than hide behind a shell corporation like "One Leasing". As always, a nice job in mil air coms by Mr. Stern. (AllanStern) wrote in message ... Monday, 17 May 2004 Interesting comms today: some concerning one of the nation's newest acft, the F/A-22 now at Tyndall AFB, and some about the good old days when "The Real Stuff" was going on at Cape Canaveral, and I was there. AIR TRANSPORT 400: DC-8, Little Rock (USAF Contractor) 8:58am: Lands Patrick. Later departs to Antigua, then to Ascension - both USAF Eastern Test Range downrange sites. [133.75] N4667B: CE-208B Cessna Caravan, US State Dept, Intl Narcotics Mission/Air Wing, Patrick AFB. 9:17am: Departs Patrick. 2:50pm: Lands Patrick. [133.75] HAWK 85; F/A-18D, Beaufort MCAS VMFA(AW)-533 9:44am: Transitions area to Mayport NAF [269.3, 273.55] MAKOs 11, 12: F-16C, Homestead JARB 482FW 93FS 10:01am: Arrives to work at Avon Park Bombing Range. [292.2, 138.125] SHARK 21: F-16C, Homestead JARB 482FW 93FS 10:25am: Arrives to work at Avon Park Bombing Range. 10:45am: RTBs to HST. [292.2, 307.1, 139.8] AX 186: C-130T, Andrews AFB VR-53 "Capitol Express" 10:31am: Area transition. Might be C-40 acft replacing VR-53's C-130Ts, as noted by Sandy in Colo recently. [133.475, 132.15] BRONCO 01: OV-10D, US State Dept US State Dept, Intl Narcotics Mission/Air Wing, Patrick AFB. 10:45am: Departs Patrick (flight of 2). 4:12pm: Lands Patrick. [133.75] AKULA 31: F-16C, Homestead JARB 482FW 93FS 10:52am: Single ship, arrives at Avon Park Bombing Range. [292.2, 307.1] JOLLYs 11, 12: HH-60G Pave Hawk Helos, Patrick AFB 920RQW 11:51am: Departs Patrick; approaches at KMLB, Patrick. [269.375] PJ 610: P-3C, Whidbey Island NAS VP-69 "Totems" Sqdn 12:10pm: Lands Patrick. [269.375] HQ 475: SH-60B, Mayport NAF HSL-46 "Grandmasters" Sqdn 12:30pm: Area transition. [132.65] VDA 4813: AN-124, Volga Dnepr (Contractor) 2:30pm: Departs NASA-KSC Shuttle Landing Facility. This huge Ukrainian transport had RONd previous night after bringing large aerospace cargo. Note RON at SLF instead of CCAFS whose runway is closed for construction. [128.55, 132.65, 124.8, 133.3] VAMPIRE 72: F/A-22, Tyndall AFB 325FW 43FS 2:45pm: Touch and go at Patrick on apparent fam flight through area; remains at low altitude (and therefor VHF freqs). This is my first snag of comms from an F/A-22. Was a bit too low and fast for me to get into my camera window. Tyndall is USAF's only F/A-22 schoolhouse; so I expect to see more of them. Made a wonderful shallow swooping pass over my house off of Patrick's Rnwy 20 before heading south along the coast. I LIKE this plane. Looks like it loves to roll. [133.75, 1312.65, 132.25] SHARKs 21, 22, 23: F-16C, Homestead JARB 482FW 93FS 3:00pm: Strafing at Avon Park Bombing Range. [292.2, 285.725, 139.8] MAKO 11 Flight: F-16C, Homestead JARB 482FW 93FS 3:00pm: Hitting tgts at Avon Park. 3:04pm: MAKO 11 has to RTB HST with problem. 3:40pm: Balance of flight RTBs. [292.2, 285.725, 307.1, 269.3, 239.25, 370.9, 322.5] SHARK 89: C-130. 3:39pm: Area transition, to waypoint Nassau. [119.825] LIMA LIMA 38: P-3C Jacksonville NAS VP-30 "Pro's Nest" Sqdn. 3:45pm: Area transition. [133.475] ZANTOP 757: Zantop Intl (Charter), Ypsilanti MI 5:27pm: Area transition. Those of us who were here in the 1960s Hey-days of the space program, remember the ever-present Zantop acft at Patrick AFB, supporting operations. ZANTOP 757 engaged in some great reminiscences about those days; this pilot flew flights into Patrick in the old days, and the 133.475 ATC was controlling flights back then. Nice to hear them chat and to feel the nostalgia of my days during the Gemini missions and the Saturn-Apollo moon-landing flights. I used to monitor the action right from the beach in those days. BOLT 13: KC-135R, MacDill 6AMW. 10:03pm: En route to Homestead. [133.475, 119.825, 132.25] AL STERN Satellite Beach FL (28-11N 80-36W) monitoring Patrick AFB (KCOF) NASA-KSC Shuttle Landing Fac (KX68) Avon Park Bombing Range (KAGR) Cape Canaveral AFS (KXMR) JSTARS E-8 Acft Integration Facility, Melbourne IAP (KMLB) Worldwide Military HF Communications Life Member: Missile, Space and Range Pioneers. http://hometown.aol.com/allanstern/m...age/index.html (My Freqs) http://hometown.aol.com/scanaddict/index.html (My Equipment) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Security is the responsibility of the originator of the message. The
feds can make their signals secure any old time they want to. If you monitored GHFS (or whatever they renamed it) during the active part of the war (before POTUS landed on the carrier and declared it over), you heard plenty of scrambled signals. [ANDVT or something like that] Blaming a civilian with a scanner for intercepting your message is about as responsible as telling the old lie that the dog ate your homework. Any foreign spook who wants this info will not depend on the net but will simply set up shop and do the job himself (or herself as the case may be). fudog50 wrote in message . .. I suppose that my distress at following OPSEC apparently only applies to us military folks. I guess it is ok for civilians to violate "OPSEC' during time of war? (whether you agree or not, we are at war, where is your patriotism? Why make it any easier for any potential enemy?) Wouldn't it be horrible if the enemy used even a miniscule part of your military A/C comms to add into a tactical strike? It's your conscience now, can you live with it if even a minute piece of your posting of CONOPS is used to plan an attack? I'll give it rest,,,,just think twice about posting military CONOPS during time of war,,,again,,you are 100% in violation of current "OPSEC" guidelines. On 21 May 2004 17:53:52 -0700, (miso) wrote: It's really sad that they are still running single engine Cessna's in the war on drugs given we lost two such planes in Columbia and US citizens are still being held hostage from one of the crashes. I wasn't aware the US had any of those Caravans registered in their own name, rather than hide behind a shell corporation like "One Leasing". As always, a nice job in mil air coms by Mr. Stern. (AllanStern) wrote in message ... Monday, 17 May 2004 Interesting comms today: some concerning one of the nation's newest acft, the F/A-22 now at Tyndall AFB, and some about the good old days when "The Real Stuff" was going on at Cape Canaveral, and I was there. AIR TRANSPORT 400: DC-8, Little Rock (USAF Contractor) 8:58am: Lands Patrick. Later departs to Antigua, then to Ascension - both USAF Eastern Test Range downrange sites. [133.75] N4667B: CE-208B Cessna Caravan, US State Dept, Intl Narcotics Mission/Air Wing, Patrick AFB. 9:17am: Departs Patrick. 2:50pm: Lands Patrick. [133.75] HAWK 85; F/A-18D, Beaufort MCAS VMFA(AW)-533 9:44am: Transitions area to Mayport NAF [269.3, 273.55] MAKOs 11, 12: F-16C, Homestead JARB 482FW 93FS 10:01am: Arrives to work at Avon Park Bombing Range. [292.2, 138.125] SHARK 21: F-16C, Homestead JARB 482FW 93FS 10:25am: Arrives to work at Avon Park Bombing Range. 10:45am: RTBs to HST. [292.2, 307.1, 139.8] AX 186: C-130T, Andrews AFB VR-53 "Capitol Express" 10:31am: Area transition. Might be C-40 acft replacing VR-53's C-130Ts, as noted by Sandy in Colo recently. [133.475, 132.15] BRONCO 01: OV-10D, US State Dept US State Dept, Intl Narcotics Mission/Air Wing, Patrick AFB. 10:45am: Departs Patrick (flight of 2). 4:12pm: Lands Patrick. [133.75] AKULA 31: F-16C, Homestead JARB 482FW 93FS 10:52am: Single ship, arrives at Avon Park Bombing Range. [292.2, 307.1] JOLLYs 11, 12: HH-60G Pave Hawk Helos, Patrick AFB 920RQW 11:51am: Departs Patrick; approaches at KMLB, Patrick. [269.375] PJ 610: P-3C, Whidbey Island NAS VP-69 "Totems" Sqdn 12:10pm: Lands Patrick. [269.375] HQ 475: SH-60B, Mayport NAF HSL-46 "Grandmasters" Sqdn 12:30pm: Area transition. [132.65] VDA 4813: AN-124, Volga Dnepr (Contractor) 2:30pm: Departs NASA-KSC Shuttle Landing Facility. This huge Ukrainian transport had RONd previous night after bringing large aerospace cargo. Note RON at SLF instead of CCAFS whose runway is closed for construction. [128.55, 132.65, 124.8, 133.3] VAMPIRE 72: F/A-22, Tyndall AFB 325FW 43FS 2:45pm: Touch and go at Patrick on apparent fam flight through area; remains at low altitude (and therefor VHF freqs). This is my first snag of comms from an F/A-22. Was a bit too low and fast for me to get into my camera window. Tyndall is USAF's only F/A-22 schoolhouse; so I expect to see more of them. Made a wonderful shallow swooping pass over my house off of Patrick's Rnwy 20 before heading south along the coast. I LIKE this plane. Looks like it loves to roll. [133.75, 1312.65, 132.25] SHARKs 21, 22, 23: F-16C, Homestead JARB 482FW 93FS 3:00pm: Strafing at Avon Park Bombing Range. [292.2, 285.725, 139.8] MAKO 11 Flight: F-16C, Homestead JARB 482FW 93FS 3:00pm: Hitting tgts at Avon Park. 3:04pm: MAKO 11 has to RTB HST with problem. 3:40pm: Balance of flight RTBs. [292.2, 285.725, 307.1, 269.3, 239.25, 370.9, 322.5] SHARK 89: C-130. 3:39pm: Area transition, to waypoint Nassau. [119.825] LIMA LIMA 38: P-3C Jacksonville NAS VP-30 "Pro's Nest" Sqdn. 3:45pm: Area transition. [133.475] ZANTOP 757: Zantop Intl (Charter), Ypsilanti MI 5:27pm: Area transition. Those of us who were here in the 1960s Hey-days of the space program, remember the ever-present Zantop acft at Patrick AFB, supporting operations. ZANTOP 757 engaged in some great reminiscences about those days; this pilot flew flights into Patrick in the old days, and the 133.475 ATC was controlling flights back then. Nice to hear them chat and to feel the nostalgia of my days during the Gemini missions and the Saturn-Apollo moon-landing flights. I used to monitor the action right from the beach in those days. BOLT 13: KC-135R, MacDill 6AMW. 10:03pm: En route to Homestead. [133.475, 119.825, 132.25] AL STERN Satellite Beach FL (28-11N 80-36W) monitoring Patrick AFB (KCOF) NASA-KSC Shuttle Landing Fac (KX68) Avon Park Bombing Range (KAGR) Cape Canaveral AFS (KXMR) JSTARS E-8 Acft Integration Facility, Melbourne IAP (KMLB) Worldwide Military HF Communications Life Member: Missile, Space and Range Pioneers. http://hometown.aol.com/allanstern/m...age/index.html (My Freqs) http://hometown.aol.com/scanaddict/index.html (My Equipment) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, miso
confessed the following: Security is the responsibility of the originator of the message. "Shack!" Blaming a civilian with a scanner for intercepting your message is about as responsible as telling the old lie that the dog ate your homework. To piggyback "miso" further... It's part of that old, "Loose lips sink ships" mantra...which "fudog50" seems to be addressing when he asked: I guess it is ok for civilians to violate "OPSEC' during time of war? Clearly the answer is an emphatic, "Well, duh!" Allan's posting is after the fact...historical if you will. IOW he's not giving out real-time or advance intelligence. Under your concern for OPSEC how much time must pass before it would be permissible for Allan to post? Again "fudog50" lamented: (whether you agree or not, we are at war, where is your patriotism? Why make it any easier for any potential enemy?) Wrapping the flag AKA patriotism around your argument kinda gives you some moral high ground. By your use of patriotism, folks opposed to aspects of the Patriot Act or GWB/Cheney/Rove/Rumsfeld are un-patriotic. Wouldn't it be horrible if the enemy used even a miniscule part of your military A/C comms to add into a tactical strike? Awww come on now "fudog50" now you're just pandering. Put your thinking cap on and contemplate probable targets and tactics. Think those islamist ****s are going to go for a "fat juicy" civilian airliner or an agile, mobile, and hostile military target? Juvat |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
In article , fudog50
wrote: I suppose that my distress at following OPSEC apparently only applies to us military folks. There is a school of thought that says OPSEC means never say anything about anything. This is particularly true at the tactical level. At the operational and strategic levels, the say-nothing policy neither works in a democratic society, nor even necessarily helps military operations. I can point to any number of military fiascoes -- Pearl Harbor, Desert One -- where overemphasis on security inside the military led to disaster, because people who needed a full picture didn't have it. Even with properly classified data, the balance between overclassification and real security is a constant juggling act. Realistically, to make substantial use of open source material, one has to have a significant analytic capability. Esepcially when dealing with a free society, the amount of data often provides its own security -- it overwhelms the analysts. fUSSR intelligence personnel have stated quite often that one of the reason the fUSSR depended on spies rather than open-source is that there was too much open source, and also they never knew when open source might be disinformation or cover. In a previous post, I gave some examples of what a competent analyst would do variously if he were considering using this data, and, indeed, whether an analyst might re-task collection guidance to provide the data through different means. I would be interested in your specific responses to these specific points on the value of the data in question, rather than lectures on patriotism. I guess it is ok for civilians to violate "OPSEC' during time of war? (whether you agree or not, we are at war, where is your patriotism? Why make it any easier for any potential enemy?) Wouldn't it be horrible if the enemy used even a miniscule part of your military A/C comms to add into a tactical strike? By that logic, no information about anything, including the behavior of national leaders, should ever be made available. As I say, there is a balance. It's your conscience now, can you live with it if even a minute piece of your posting of CONOPS is used to plan an attack? EVERYTHING in counterintelligence planning is a balancing act. In military operational planning, there has to be a good deal of staff support, and willingness to listen to the intelligence people, before lots of open source becomes relevant. I don't think EVERYONE in Iraqi intelligence was incompetent, but Saddam wanted to hear what fit his preconceptions. I would seriously question how much open source intelligence is done by terrorists. I would especially doubt they are likely to have the kind of analyst that stays concerned with following US air operational technique over a long period. The US and USSR did, as did some other powers -- but when resources are limited, he who tries to track everything quickly becomes overwhelmed. Traditionally, the glory jobs in intelligence are in collection, not analysis, which led to situations such as an audit during Viet Nam, showing that DIA was about 400 file drawers behind in looking at collection reports, and it still kept coming. I'll give it rest,,,,just think twice about posting military CONOPS during time of war,,,again,,you are 100% in violation of current "OPSEC" guidelines. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Florida Mil Comms Logging - Sunday 9 May 2004 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 0 | May 10th 04 05:06 AM |
Mil Acft Comms Log, Florida - Friday 30 April 2004 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 0 | May 1st 04 07:12 AM |
Florida Military Comms Log - Thurs 15 Apr 2004 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 1 | April 17th 04 08:38 PM |
Military Comms, Florida, Sat 10 Apr 2004 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 0 | April 12th 04 07:36 AM |
Mil Comms Logged in Florida, Friday 9 Apr 2004 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 0 | April 10th 04 07:33 AM |