A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Somebody check your mike on the radio, please..."



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 19th 05, 10:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Somebody check your mike on the radio, please..."

If I hear this ONE more time on Unicom, I'm going to scream!

Is it *really* possible that one can be a certificated pilot, and *NOT*
know that it's impossible to receive AND transmit at the same time?

Is it *really* possible that a certicated pilot would transmit a
statement like this into the ether, expecting the guy with the stuck
mike to actually be able to HEAR what he's saying?

Sadly, the answer is "yes". We hear it almost every time there's a
stuck-mike situation.

Truly scary...

I'll take a hundred guys saying "Any other traffic, please advise..."
over THIS kind of stupidity.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #2  
Old November 19th 05, 10:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Somebody check your mike on the radio, please..."

Is it *really* possible that a certicated pilot would transmit a
statement like this into the ether, expecting the guy with the stuck
mike to actually be able to HEAR what he's saying?


There are actually a few situations in which the aircraft with a stuck
mike might hear the transmissions. Granted they are not common, but
they are neither impossible nor contrived.

Jose
--
He who laughs, lasts.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #3  
Old November 19th 05, 10:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Somebody check your mike on the radio, please..."


"Jose" wrote in message
...
Is it *really* possible that a certicated pilot would transmit a
statement like this into the ether, expecting the guy with the stuck
mike to actually be able to HEAR what he's saying?


There are actually a few situations in which the aircraft with a stuck
mike might hear the transmissions. Granted they are not common, but
they are neither impossible nor contrived.


And on a Unicom frequency those would be what?

Jose
--
He who laughs, lasts.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.



  #4  
Old November 19th 05, 10:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Somebody check your mike on the radio, please..."

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:32:57 GMT, Dave Stadt wrote:

There are actually a few situations in which the aircraft with a stuck
mike might hear the transmissions. Granted they are not common, but
they are neither impossible nor contrived.


And on a Unicom frequency those would be what?


Lets expand this a tad further..... any frequency.

The absolute time I could ever think that someone heard that they had a
stuck mike would be if they were listening in on a handheld radio,
otherwise, I cannot think of any situations.

Allen
  #5  
Old November 19th 05, 11:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Somebody check your mike on the radio, please..."

hmmm... what I had in mind was a split (pilot/copilot) stack, but upon
further thought the transmitter would overwhelm the receiver, even
though the receiver is not switched off.

As Rosanne RosannaDanna would say, "never mind".

Jose
(Damn... that's the =second= time I was wrong!)
--
He who laughs, lasts.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #6  
Old November 20th 05, 12:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Somebody check your mike on the radio, please..."


"Jose" wrote in message
. ..
hmmm... what I had in mind was a split (pilot/copilot) stack, but upon
further thought the transmitter would overwhelm the receiver, even though
the receiver is not switched off.

As Rosanne RosannaDanna would say, "never mind".

Jose
(Damn... that's the =second= time I was wrong!)
--
He who laughs, lasts.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.


How about in a dual com situation, tx on com1 and rec on com2?

Harvey


  #7  
Old November 21st 05, 11:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Somebody check your mike on the radio, please..."

And if the stack has an audio panel worthy of the name, the opposite
transceiver's audio is cut off during transmit to prevent an unholy squeal
coming down the audio line of the receiver that is still operating.

Jim


"Jose" wrote in message
. ..
hmmm... what I had in mind was a split (pilot/copilot) stack, but upon
further thought the transmitter would overwhelm the receiver, even though
the receiver is not switched off.

ss.


  #8  
Old November 20th 05, 06:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Somebody check your mike on the radio, please..."

A Lieberman wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:32:57 GMT, Dave Stadt wrote:

There are actually a few situations in which the aircraft with a
stuck mike might hear the transmissions. Granted they are not
common, but they are neither impossible nor contrived.


And on a Unicom frequency those would be what?


Lets expand this a tad further..... any frequency.

The absolute time I could ever think that someone heard that they had
a stuck mike would be if they were listening in on a handheld radio,
otherwise, I cannot think of any situations.

Allen


Depends on the location of the hand mike. I've seen situations where the
pilots knee pushed the transmit button intermittently so the stuck mike
situation was not constant. In this case he might be able to hear the
"stuck mike warning" transmission. It's happened to me.

--

Darrell R. Schmidt
B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/
-


  #9  
Old November 20th 05, 04:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Somebody check your mike on the radio, please..."

Dave Stadt wrote:
"Jose" wrote in message
...

Is it *really* possible that a certicated pilot would transmit a
statement like this into the ether, expecting the guy with the stuck
mike to actually be able to HEAR what he's saying?


There are actually a few situations in which the aircraft with a stuck
mike might hear the transmissions. Granted they are not common, but
they are neither impossible nor contrived.


And on a Unicom frequency those would be what?


Any frequency, if a pilot has two radios and both are tuned to the same freqency.

George Patterson
If a tank is out of ammunition, what you have is a sixty ton portable
radio.
  #10  
Old November 20th 05, 04:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Somebody check your mike on the radio, please..."


"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:ZSSff.391$8o6.371@trndny03...
Dave Stadt wrote:
"Jose" wrote in message
...

Is it *really* possible that a certicated pilot would transmit a
statement like this into the ether, expecting the guy with the stuck
mike to actually be able to HEAR what he's saying?

There are actually a few situations in which the aircraft with a stuck
mike might hear the transmissions. Granted they are not common, but
they are neither impossible nor contrived.


And on a Unicom frequency those would be what?


Any frequency, if a pilot has two radios and both are tuned to the same

freqency.

Not.

George Patterson
If a tank is out of ammunition, what you have is a sixty ton

portable
radio.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RIP Mike Valentine Mal Soaring 0 December 11th 04 08:27 PM
Changes in Instrument Proficiency Check Requirements Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 71 June 10th 04 08:02 PM
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? Guy Alcala Military Aviation 265 March 7th 04 09:28 AM
Radio silence, Market Garden and death at Arnhem ArtKramr Military Aviation 4 February 12th 04 12:05 AM
Use of hand-held GPS on FAA check ride Barry Instrument Flight Rules 1 August 9th 03 09:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.