A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONSon 9/11



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old February 23rd 06, 03:32 AM posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONSon 9/11

You should mention that he is primarily an expert in Cold Fusion &
Christ's visit to America. He is neither an expert on materials or
demolition.

TRUTH wrote:
Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to hundreds of
people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the government's version of
events "defies physics". The Feb 1st seminar can be viewed on Google
Video, or downloaded to your computer.


The following is a excerpt from Jones' PEER REVIEWED paper:

"I presented my objections to the “official” theory at a seminar at BYU
on September 22, 2005, to about sixty people. I also showed evidence and
scientific arguments for the controlled demolition theory. In attendance
were faculty from Physics, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering,
Electrical Engineering, Psychology, Geology, and Mathematics – and
perhaps other departments as I did not recognize all of the people
present. A local university and college were represented (BYU and Utah
Valley State College).

The discussion was vigorous and lasted nearly two hours. It ended only
when a university class needed the room. After presenting the material
summarized here, including actually looking at and discussing the
collapses of WTC 7 and the Towers, only one attendee disagreed (by hand-
vote) that further investigation of the WTC collapses was called for.
The next day, the dissenting professor said he had further thought about
it and now agreed that more investigation was needed."



Professor Jones now has dozens of people suporting him. His finding are
based on scientific evidence and logical reasoning.

In other words, you won't find any people using terms like kook, tin foil
hat, or any other childish terms. The people who understand his
scientific evidence are clear minded and not closed asshole headed like a
lot of people in this newsgroup seem to be. You people are pathetic.


You stupid people don't know anything about anything when it comes to
9/11.

The airplanes were flown by remote control. The events were for the
purpose of building public support to invade Afghanistan and Iraq. Some
of you will still deny this fact. If so, it will be because your thinking
process is too much filled with tin foil hat commments, and you're too
stupid and brainwashed to understand real evidence

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 Darkwing Piloting 15 March 8th 06 01:38 AM
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 Jim Logajan Piloting 120 March 6th 06 02:37 AM
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 Chad Irby Piloting 52 February 28th 06 03:59 AM
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 khobar Piloting 2 February 23rd 06 09:24 PM
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 cjcampbell Piloting 0 February 23rd 06 02:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.