If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
How does something like this happen? Was it the pressure of not wanting to
deprive the young girl of her Christmas present? Not having to say come back another time? Awful, awful news. As a newly minted private pilot, I had a similar opportunity to give a young lad and his father their first airplane ride. As we pulled the rental plane out of the hangar, the wind began to pick up substantially, and the sky became covered with a low, scuddy layer. Looking at the excited kid and his dad, the pressure to fly was tremendous. The airport's single-runway was 90 degrees offset from the wind direction, and the scud was clearly moving in off of Lake Michigan. If we were even going to get to fly the pattern, it was now or never... ....and I chose never. As we pushed the plane back into the hangar, their disappointment was palpable. Sadly, I never did get that kid in the air. But I made the right choice. A man has got to know his limitations. My condolences to the families. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"nrp" wrote in message oups.com... It has really bugged me that Kennedy, who I understand was nearly complete with his instrument rating, couldn't even make the transition in a slowly deteriorating situation. I know another case some years ago of a fellow that was working on an instrument that also lost a Mooney and three other guys in a similar situation with ground fog and a night departure, and 5 hours of fuel on board. If you read the accident reports you'll see plenty of instrument pilots lose it in the soup too. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Good question...
A 1954 study (Stonecipher, et al) found that of 20 private pilots, of varying levels of experience, exactly 0 'survived' a simulated encounter with IFR conditions. 19 did graveyard spirals, and 1 was going to do a whip stall when the data-taker/safety pilot said "I've got it." My experience on BFR's may not be representative, as I am considered a 'tough; insturctor and that reputation precedes me to the point that most of the people who call me are pretty good pilots to begin with and probably perform better than the average. Given that, my experience is such that I think that in excess of 70% of private pilots would 'buy it' if they wandered into instrument conditions. The real numbers may be higher. One of the problems we have (but is not well discussed) is that in training the stress level (even on a BFR) is a tiny fraction of what the pilot will experience if he runs into these conditions solo. Stress degrades performance in every area, so I think that what we see on the BFR is something of a best case scenario. I try to make the hood work a little more demanding than the average CFI, to simulate some of the stress that may occur in the real situation, but I think I am still an order of magnitutde or two below what a non-instrument-rated private pilot experiences in a real (solo) IMC encounter. A clue can be had by listening to the video presentation "17 Ways to Fall Out of the Sky"; there is an audio tape in that video of a real life VFR-into-IMC encounter involving a VFR C310 pilot trying to get down through an overcast. Noteably, when he first gets into trouble his voice goes up at least two octaves. (He did not make it.) Unlike some CFIs, I aggressively seek out actual instrument condtions in which to take up not only my instrument students but also my private students. I figure if they have proven to themselves that they can indeed hold it right side up in turbulence in IMC, then their stress will be (a little) lower if it ever happens for real. I like to train them well beyond the PTS in this area, but not all students are willing to do that (those that aren't have to go somewhere else--I sleep really well at night and want to keep it that way.) I have unique methods for teaching flight by reference to instruments, and I have at least one known 'save' of a student pilot who got into IMC on his first solo, and flew there for 20 min successfully before breaking out and landing--using the methods he heard me present in a Wings Seminar. (Please don't try this at home...!) I think most pilots are grossly unaware of how insidious spatial disorientation can be for the non-IMC-experienced pilot. Most people seem to think that the accident pilot is unaware of his improper flight attitude, and would correct to level if he or she knew; I think this is a dangerous idea. I have personally observed a student pilot in IMC as she rolled into a left spiral while literally screaming at me for help because 'it's rolling to the left and I can't stop it.' Her conscious mind could read the instruments and correctly deduce our real attitude, but it had lost the battle for control of her hands to her unconscious, which was following the (erroneous) inner ear indications into the left spiral. To her it felt as if the controls were jammed, and she could not get it to roll to the right. (I had her let go and then I rolled out with two fingers.) I think a major portion of the spatial disorientation accidents are of this ilk; i.e. fully aware of the nature of the problem but unable to move their hands to recover. JFK, for example; needle slap indicated he had applied maximum takeoff power before he hit the water... I suspect he knew fully well what was going on but could not stop it. This is the difference between an instrument rated pilot and an instrument competent pilot; the competent instrument pilot has enough IMC experience that he has been able to condition his unconscious to let go and let the conscious mind take control of the hands. I think most VFR-rate pilots are nowhere near this level of IMC experience, and when the stress maxes out, they are toast. All the more reason to avoid situations that get anywhere close to the edge. Gene |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
JFK Jr.
As I understand it, JFK Jr. was reported to be "50%" through his instrument rating. By that point one should in theory have no difficulty managing the conditions he encountered. But, the record shows that when the windows went grey he did not have or could not apply the required skills. A grocery store clerk asked me, shortly after that accident, "Doesn't it worry you, training people to go off and then maybe crash like that?" I had a simple answer: "If he'd been my student he wouldn't be dead now and we wouldn't be having this converstation." It really hurts me to see this kind of stuff happen; it is needless. contrary to one of the other posters here, I am of the opinion that light aircraft flying can be much safer than driving a car (ok I live in LA and driving here is a lot more crazy, but still...) if you properly manage the risk. In my car, I am at the mercy of every testosterone-poisoned teenager who decides to weave through traffic at 120 mph. I cannot control his studpidity. In the airplane, I HAVE CONTROL OF HOW MUCH RISK I TAKE. When I go up to see my mom in San Jose, I feel MUCH safer when I fly than when I drive up I-5. I know what the risk factors are in the airplane, and how to mitigate them. I cannot control these idiots in their 'hot' cars! I wish I could just grab on to some people (pilots) and just shake them until they hear me. YOU CAN MAKE THIS AS SAFE AS YOU WANT! STOP BEING STUPID! OK, sorry, off my soapbox... Gene |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Yes!!!!!!!
*You*... are a *pilot!* Gene |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
The pressure is tremendous--it's human nature. Just think about when you
offer to take someone up that you see on a regular basis for the first time--you talk about it. A lot. When that day comes where the schedules fall into place, there's usually a lot of leading up to that day. Saying "no" is hard. It get's harder when you have a couple of attempted flights in recent memory that were cancelled due to iffy weather and the weather turned out to be better than forecast. But as a "good" pilot, you need to say no. It's your responsibility. For this reason, I find myself not going out of my way anymore to offer "new" flyers flights. If it works out due to last-minute circumstances--great. The absence of a long-term plan for the trip makes cancelling for any reason easy. If you fly long enough, the weather will eventually throw you a curve. It's unfortunate Jean wasn't ready when it threw her one and terrible that she had a young passenger on board. I consider myself lucky that my curve ball (and a deep respect for weather) came when I was had not one but two CFIIs on board. A fog rolled in from the south shore of Long Island, NY and covered the island within minutes. We had to divert and shoot an ILS to minimums at another airport and wait it out a couple of hours. God bless their souls and families. Marco Leon "Jay Honeck" wrote in message: [snip] Looking at the excited kid and his dad, the pressure to fly was tremendous. The airport's single-runway was 90 degrees offset from the wind direction, and the scud was clearly moving in off of Lake Michigan. If we were even going to get to fly the pattern, it was now or never... ...and I chose never. As we pushed the plane back into the hangar, their disappointment was palpable. Sadly, I never did get that kid in the air. But I made the right choice. A man has got to know his limitations. My condolences to the families. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Good question...
A 1954 study (Stonecipher, et al) found that of 20 private pilots, of varying levels of experience, exactly 0 'survived' a simulated encounter with IFR conditions. 19 did graveyard spirals, and 1 was going to do a whip stall when the data-taker/safety pilot said "I've got it." My experience on BFR's may not be representative, as I am considered a 'tough; insturctor and that reputation precedes me to the point that most of the people who call me are pretty good pilots to begin with and probably perform better than the average. Given that, my experience is such that I think that in excess of 70% of private pilots would 'buy it' if they wandered into instrument conditions. The real numbers may be higher. One of the problems we have (but is not well discussed) is that in training the stress level (even on a BFR) is a tiny fraction of what the pilot will experience if he runs into these conditions solo. Stress degrades performance in every area, so I think that what we see on the BFR is something of a best case scenario. I try to make the hood work a little more demanding than the average CFI, to simulate some of the stress that may occur in the real situation, but I think I am still an order of magnitutde or two below what a non-instrument-rated private pilot experiences in a real (solo) IMC encounter. A clue can be had by listening to the video presentation "17 Ways to Fall Out of the Sky"; there is an audio tape in that video of a real life VFR-into-IMC encounter involving a VFR C310 pilot trying to get down through an overcast. Noteably, when he first gets into trouble his voice goes up at least two octaves. (He did not make it.) Unlike some CFIs, I aggressively seek out actual instrument condtions in which to take up not only my instrument students but also my private students. I figure if they have proven to themselves that they can indeed hold it right side up in turbulence in IMC, then their stress will be (a little) lower if it ever happens for real. I like to train them well beyond the PTS in this area, but not all students are willing to do that (those that aren't have to go somewhere else--I sleep really well at night and want to keep it that way.) I have unique methods for teaching flight by reference to instruments, and I have at least one known 'save' of a student pilot who got into IMC on his first solo, and flew there for 20 min successfully before breaking out and landing--using the methods he heard me present in a Wings Seminar. (Please don't try this at home...!) I think most pilots are grossly unaware of how insidious spatial disorientation can be for the non-IMC-experienced pilot. Most people seem to think that the accident pilot is unaware of his improper flight attitude, and would correct to level if he or she knew; I think this is a dangerous idea. I have personally observed a student pilot in IMC as she rolled into a left spiral while literally screaming at me for help because 'it's rolling to the left and I can't stop it.' Her conscious mind could read the instruments and correctly deduce our real attitude, but it had lost the battle for control of her hands to her unconscious, which was following the (erroneous) inner ear indications into the left spiral. To her it felt as if the controls were jammed, and she could not get it to roll to the right. (I had her let go and then I rolled out with two fingers.) I think a major portion of the spatial disorientation accidents are of this ilk; i.e. fully aware of the nature of the problem but unable to move their hands to recover. JFK, for example; needle slap indicated he had applied maximum takeoff power before he hit the water... I suspect he knew fully well what was going on but could not stop it. This is the difference between an instrument rated pilot and an instrument competent pilot; the competent instrument pilot has enough IMC experience that he has been able to condition his unconscious to let go and let the conscious mind take control of the hands. I think most VFR-rate pilots are nowhere near this level of IMC experience, and when the stress maxes out, they are toast. All the more reason to avoid situations that get anywhere close to the edge. Gene |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Marco,
I offer you an alternative method of dealing with that pressure. Instead of not offering, properly set the expectations up front. That is, explain to them that you want them to have a really good experience, and in order for that to happen you have to have good, clear, smooth conditions. Set up and 'out,' ie and alternative planned activity if the weather turns out to be not just right. You can also set a rain date; "if the weather does not cooperate on that weekend, how bout a 'rain date' on the 25th?" This communicates to your prospective passenger that you are reallly concerned for their feelings (almost all of them are at least a little scared). They are usually delighted that you are going to say no if it is not perfect. By having the expectation set that a cancellation/reschedule is likely, and the reschedule date already agreed upon, the dissappointment about not flying on the appointed day is greatly mitigated. All of this makes it easeir for you to say no when that is the right thing to do. Gene |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
("Marco Leon" mleon(at)optonline.net) wrote:
The pressure is tremendous--it's human nature. Just think about when you offer to take someone up that you see on a regular basis for the first time--you talk about it. A lot. When that day comes where the schedules fall into place, there's usually a lot of leading up to that day. I have taken up several "first flight" people and in every conversation we have, from day one right up to the drive to the airport, I discuss the possibility that we might no be able to make the flight due to weather or an unexpected maintenance issue. -- Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Germany Lost the War... So What? | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 55 | February 26th 04 08:51 AM |
Lost comms after radar vector | Mike Ciholas | Instrument Flight Rules | 119 | January 31st 04 11:39 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |