Legality of owning ex-military intercontinental aircraft.

Hi

Are flunkys one step above or below a lackey???

Cheers...Chris

In article ,
"Bill Silvey" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om
"Bill Silvey" wrote:

"Dave Kearton" wrote:
"Bill Silvey" wrote:

The community of Narcoosee, just south of Orlando, has
intercontinental striking capability.

(The VFW has a Pershing-I sitting in it's parking lot.)

This could mean trouble if the peace talks with Osceola County break
down ....

Ha! More agitprop sabre-rattling from the running dog lackeys of the
illegal Osceola Clique! ;-)

Not to worry. The elite Disney anti-terror teams will take out those
horrible weapons with very little effort. They don't like the
competition.

The death squads controlled by the cryptofascist running clique of Disney
will never overcome the PLAoSC!

That might be so, but Universal Studios has that whole warehouse full of
leftover Terminators to play with, and they hire them out for parties
and insurrections.

--


Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.

In article ,
(BUFDRVR) wrote:

The Yankee Air Force advertises their B-52 as the only privately
owned B-52 in the world. On the tour, they told me that it is not
part of the Air Force Museum program, and that it took some special
accreditidation for them to be able to obtain it.

Hmm, I'd be curious to know how they got such special accreditation. One thing
is the same though, that aircraft is available to be inspected under START II,
privately owned or not.

Well, if the Russians wanted to look them up, all they'd have to do is
show up during business hours and pay the admission fee.

http://www.yankeeairmuseum.org/Museum.html

I think it's $5.00 for admission, but I'm sure the Museum would let it
slide for an accredited inspection team.

--


Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om
In article ,
(BUFDRVR) wrote:

The Yankee Air Force advertises their B-52 as the only privately
owned B-52 in the world. On the tour, they told me that it is not
part of the Air Force Museum program, and that it took some special
accreditidation for them to be able to obtain it.

Hmm, I'd be curious to know how they got such special accreditation.
One thing is the same though, that aircraft is available to be
inspected under START II, privately owned or not.

Well, if the Russians wanted to look them up, all they'd have to do is
show up during business hours and pay the admission fee.

http://www.yankeeairmuseum.org/Museum.html

I think it's $5.00 for admission, but I'm sure the Museum would let it
slide for an accredited inspection team.

Are you nuts!? That'd bankrupt the Russian economy!

g

--
http://www.delversdungeon.dragonsfoot.org
Remove the X's in my email address to respond.
"Damn you Silvey, and your endless fortunes." - Stephen Weir
I hate furries.

Hi

Are flunkys one step above or below a lackey???


Yes

Hi

Many thanks for the definitive answer.

Cheers...Chris


When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
Ha! More agitprop sabre-rattling from the running dog lackeys of the
illegal Osceola Clique! ;-)


Trained with Radio Hanoi did you?

Radio Hanoi, god, that brings back memories.
Perhaps I should see if I can get on of the old SW sets going...

"Bill Silvey" wrote in message
om...
"B2431" wrote in message

"B2431" wrote in message

Ha! More agitprop sabre-rattling from the running dog lackeys of
the illegal Osceola Clique! ;-)


Trained with Radio Hanoi did you?

You left out hegemonist.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

Let's try this again.

"Ha! More agitprop sabre-rattling from the running dog lackeys of
the illegal junta of hegemonists who control the fascist Osceola
clique!"

Better? :-)

By George, I think he's got it.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

I said that all in one breath and collapsed a lung...

Not important, comrade. Just be sure you got the number blocks right.

In article , John A. Weeks III
writes
In article , Jim Yanik
wrote:

(BUFDRVR) wrote in
:

It would have to be demilled sufficiently so it would not be a
military threat, but otherwise it wouldn't be much different to owning
any other warbird. Just more expensive.


With the exception of B-52s. Even B-52 display aircraft are accounted
for in START II and a limit set at a specific number. Additionally,
*all* B-52 display aircraft are owned by the Air Force Museum. You may
pay for refurbishment, you may pay to keep it looking good, but
tommorow the Air Force Museum can come and take it back.

The Yankee Air Force advertises their B-52 as the only privately
owned B-52 in the world. On the tour, they told me that it is not
part of the Air Force Museum program, and that it took some special
accreditidation for them to be able to obtain it.

-john-


Who owns 56-0689, the B-52D at the American Air Museum at Duxford?
--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!

Trained with Radio Hanoi did you?

Radio Hanoi, god, that brings back memories.
Perhaps I should see if I can get on of the old SW sets going...


We used to listen to Radio Hanoi for the music which was better than AFVNs. The
political stuff was a hoot.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

So, does that mean a B29 flying counts against the treaty for
delivery systems since the B29 had a model that was nuclear
payload capable?

Probably not, since the 29 wasn't designed as a nuclear delivery
system, while the 36 was. (Well, okay, so it wasn't; but it was a
nuclear delivery system from the day it went into service. As I
recall, its first operational test was to fly from Fort Worth to
Hawaii, drop a 10,000-lb block of something into the ocean, and fly
home again without refueling. Wasn't that on Dec 7, to make the point
even more obvious?)

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: www.danford.net/letters.htm#9

see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com