If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"robert arndt" wrote in message
om... p.s. Isn't it strange that every nation that ventures into space is dubbed a 'naut? US= Astronaut. Russia= Cosmonaut. China= Taikonaut. Although this generally means "space navigator" the Germans if they ever launch their own manned flight would call theirs a Raumjaeger- literally, "Space Hunter"- a more miltaristic term based on their other military Jaegers: Feldjaeger, Gebirgsjaeger, Fallschirmjaeger. Naut means "the way". Astronaut, as in "the way of the stars". (I'm getting my explanation from Egyptian Uponaut, meaning "Opener of The Way.") Si |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Nonsense. In Germany, astronauts are called either "Astronauten" or "Raumfahrer" and that wouldn't change if they were launched by a German rocket. That's a relief! Based on my devoted study of the language, traveling from gasthaus to gasthaus in 1958, I would have rendered it Fernfahrter. (By the way, I thought Germans were rather rude to American tourists, too. Especially in the post office.) all the best -- Dan Ford email: www.danford.net/letters.htm#9 see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Minyard wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:48:01 GMT, "Ed Majden" wrote: "Alan Minyard" The moon flights were certainly propaganda. There is nothing left to learn from manned lunar shots. I certainly hope that the Chinese will not waste the human lives and tremendous resources that such a mission would entail. You don't know very much about science if you think there is nothing more to learn about going back to the Moon. Leaving Lunar Science aside, the far side of the Moon is an ideal place for a radio telescope as all the man made noise created on earth would be blocked. Also an ideal place for an optical telescope either manned or robotic. NASA is talking of a trip to Mars. Hell, they had better get going back to the Moon safely before they attempt going out further. They don't have the booster capability to even do this today. Ed A radio telescope on the moon? You can't be serious. Do you have any idea how many flights would be required? Al for an optical telescope, earth orbit is far, far more practical. Moon missions are a waste of time and money. Al Minyard Yea, and France is the enemy. What a prick you are, Minyard. The Chinese will build that station while their economy blooms; and they will sneer in superior contempt at your obese, unwashed barbarian whining. Filthy gaijin. Grantland |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Chad Irby" wrote in message m... "Daryl Hunt" wrote: That makes 4 nations. US, Russia, China and the Muppets "Pigs in 'Space'" You left out the Duchy of Grand Fenwick. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com And the Mayor of Washington D.C. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Cub Driver schrieb:
Nonsense. In Germany, astronauts are called either "Astronauten" or "Raumfahrer" and that wouldn't change if they were launched by a German rocket. That's a relief! Based on my devoted study of the language, traveling from gasthaus to gasthaus in 1958, I would have rendered it Fernfahrter. g No, "fahren" applies to vehicles, ships, airships, but not to planes and rockets. (By the way, I thought Germans were rather rude to American tourists, too. Canīt comment on this (since I try to be rude to no one)... but.. Especially in the post office.) .... that used to be normal in post offices - today they tend to ignore the customer or pretend to be braindead. Well, some are. all the best -- Dan Ford email: www.danford.net/letters.htm#9 Gruss, Roman |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed Majden" writes:
The American space efforts were not necessarily done on their own either. I think Mr. Newton should be given some credit along with Mr. Von Braun and his crew. Canadian born Jim Chamberlin chief designer of the CF-105 AVRO Arrow was basically the guy that designed the Gemini space craft. He was one of a number of AVRO Canada engineers that headed south to work for NASA after the sad cancellation of the Arrow project. See: http://www.exn.ca/Stories/1999/07/06/64.asp Scientific efforts are build of the shoulders of scientists of many nations, not just one. I think the Chinese should be congratulated! I only hope their efforts are peaceful ones and not cold war one-up-man-ship as was the case in the past. Bravo for a good post amongst the rubbish! In Japan there is great effort to continue to improve their launch rockets, but at present there is not enough confidence to go to manned launches on their own. The Chinese are indeed to be congratulated, vey impressive indeed, no matter what help they had - that, after all, is the point of scientific progress. -- G Hassenpflug * IJN & JMSDF equipment/history fan |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
John C. Baker wrote in message
... While manned space flight is an impressive technical accomplishment, and space exploration is important to mankind's understanding of himself, I have one thing to say to Beijing: "Welcome to 1961." Standby for garish polyester clothing and bitter, ugly women without bras. -- Scott -------- "Interestingly, we started to lose this war only after the embedded reporters pulled out. Back when we got the news directly from Iraq, there was victory and optimism. Now that the news is filtered through the mainstream media here in America, all we hear is death and destruction and quagmire..." Ann Coulter http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2003/091703.htm |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Majden wrote in message
news:Lfgjb.103719$6C4.38239@pd7tw1no... snip I only hope their efforts are peaceful ones and not cold war one-up-man-ship as was the case in the past. Competition improves the herd, about 40 years ahead of schedule it would seem.. -- Scott -------- "Interestingly, we started to lose this war only after the embedded reporters pulled out. Back when we got the news directly from Iraq, there was victory and optimism. Now that the news is filtered through the mainstream media here in America, all we hear is death and destruction and quagmire..." Ann Coulter http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2003/091703.htm |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Andreas Parsch wrote in message ...
robert arndt wrote: p.s. Isn't it strange that every nation that ventures into space is dubbed a 'naut? US= Astronaut. Russia= Cosmonaut. China= Taikonaut. Although this generally means "space navigator" the Germans if they ever launch their own manned flight would call theirs a Raumjaeger- literally, "Space Hunter"- a more miltaristic term based on their other military Jaegers: Feldjaeger, Gebirgsjaeger, Fallschirmjaeger. Nonsense. In Germany, astronauts are called either "Astronauten" or "Raumfahrer" and that wouldn't change if they were launched by a German rocket. Andreas Andreas, "Raumjaeger" originated with Von Braun's space ideas in the '40s even as work was being concentrated on the A-4 rocket. You are familiar with the entire A-series up to the A-12, the proposed German space station, the metallic-sodium space mirror death ray, and the piloted V-2 (EMW A6)... not to mention Sanger's Silverbird? Although none of the space projects were accomplished, design studies on advanced pressure suits were done with Von Braun sketching out the first real concepts of a functional spacesuit. The fact that German astronauts and cosmonauts adopted those foreign names means little as they were passengers aboard foreign spacecraft. The renewed Sanger 2-stage vehicle project was something different. International depictions of the craft along with the models presented were for an unmanned vehicle. However, in Germany, where a large scale mockup of the vehicle was built as well as German models made- there are clearly viewports incorporated into the design suggesting that the craft was to be manned. An article on the Sanger back in the early '90s stated that if built the Sanger would have been flown by Luftwaffe pilots which at that time were to be called "Jaegernaut"- a name originating with the foreign publication. The article (which could have been AW&ST IIRC) further stated that the Sanger was being considered for dual-purpose usage as a launcher of LEO weapons. So, don't assume that any future German manned launch would be an ESA peace mission. If Sanger is ever built the very first payload might very well be a spy sat or other military package. Even if not built and a German rocket is launched instead, German nationalism will guarantee a different name. Raumfahrer? Never. Raumjaeger or Jaegernaut, probably. Rob |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Scott wrote:
Competition improves the herd, about 40 years ahead of schedule it would seem.. Fear and funding improves the herd. Trucking up instrumentation or supplies to a space station does not excite the public. They have short attention spans and soon loose interest. Politicians are also reluctant to allocate funds if they aren't in the limelight and getting votes cast their way. Maybe this China success will put a sparc back into space exploration! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1979 "The National Air and Space Museum" 1st Edition Book | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 11th 04 08:24 AM |
Space Elevator | Big John | Home Built | 111 | July 21st 04 04:31 PM |
FS: 1979 "The National Air and Space Museum" 1st Edition out-of-print Book | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 19th 04 05:19 AM |
Strategic Command Missions Rely on Space | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 30th 03 09:59 PM |
FS: 1979 "The National Air and Space Museum" 1st Edition out-of-print Book | Jim Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 3rd 03 11:49 AM |