If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ATP wants a single engine add on
And for some reason he's picked me for the honor of training him.
But I'm a little confused on one thing. He claims to have a commercial-multi, limited to centerline thrust, and an ATP multi, unrestricted, with 737 and 757/767 type ratings. I wasn't aware that you could have both those certificates...is that true? And if it is, onto which certificate does the single engine airplane add on go? And one last question. I know I'd never, ever, train a primary student, as long as it's been since I instructed, but this shouldn't be a huge deal, right? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ATP wants a single engine add on
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:43:08 -0500, Emily
wrote: And for some reason he's picked me for the honor of training him. But I'm a little confused on one thing. He claims to have a commercial-multi, limited to centerline thrust, and an ATP multi, unrestricted, with 737 and 757/767 type ratings. I wasn't aware that you could have both those certificates...is that true? And if it is, onto which certificate does the single engine airplane add on go? And one last question. I know I'd never, ever, train a primary student, as long as it's been since I instructed, but this shouldn't be a huge deal, right? While I don't know the answer, I gave someone a BFR a couple months ago with the same situation (except for the centerline thrust limitation). I wasn't sure of the exact way to sign him off, so I just left out the type of certificate he had as literally every other instructor had done for the past 10 years. Whatever you learn here, you may want to call the FSDO and/or examiner who will do the check ride to make sure you satisfy them. z |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ATP wants a single engine add on
I've done it. Its an odd combination. On one hand they know the ATC
system very well (although I've found they believe the VFR system is more restrictive than it is), on the other hand, there is some basic stick-rudder items that they will be lacking. I did a C-182T (glass cockpit) checkout with a 727 pilot once. When I asked him to do power on stalls, the thought occured to me to ask him if he knew which rudder was going to be needed to stay coordinated in the stall. "Left?" he said. My pointis that you need to remember that, dispite your student's knowledge in some areas, he's a student pilot in others. -Robert, CFII Emily wrote: And for some reason he's picked me for the honor of training him. But I'm a little confused on one thing. He claims to have a commercial-multi, limited to centerline thrust, and an ATP multi, unrestricted, with 737 and 757/767 type ratings. I wasn't aware that you could have both those certificates...is that true? And if it is, onto which certificate does the single engine airplane add on go? And one last question. I know I'd never, ever, train a primary student, as long as it's been since I instructed, but this shouldn't be a huge deal, right? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ATP wants a single engine add on
My guess is that he is ex-mil... to account for the resume you've
listed. It DOES sound weird tho.. You would think the ATP would override the commercial multi CLT.. As for which one it adds on to: My guess is.. which ever one he wants.. He can train for a ASEL ride to private, commercial or ATP standards provided he has the time in type for the add-on. (havent looked at the applicable reg for this one as to any required hours). I'm guessing he just has to declare in advance which ride he is taking, then meet the standards for it. Dave Emily wrote: And for some reason he's picked me for the honor of training him. But I'm a little confused on one thing. He claims to have a commercial-multi, limited to centerline thrust, and an ATP multi, unrestricted, with 737 and 757/767 type ratings. I wasn't aware that you could have both those certificates...is that true? And if it is, onto which certificate does the single engine airplane add on go? And one last question. I know I'd never, ever, train a primary student, as long as it's been since I instructed, but this shouldn't be a huge deal, right? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ATP wants a single engine add on
Dave S wrote:
My guess is that he is ex-mil... to account for the resume you've listed. He is. Has never flown a single. It DOES sound weird tho.. You would think the ATP would override the commercial multi CLT.. That's what I thought. Granted, he *could* just be carrying around the invalid commercial, assuming it's still valid. Not sure what good it is. As for which one it adds on to: My guess is.. which ever one he wants.. He can train for a ASEL ride to private, commercial or ATP standards provided he has the time in type for the add-on. (havent looked at the applicable reg for this one as to any required hours). I'm trying to make it make sense by thinking of it how I did it. I had a commercial single and just added the multi on. I believe it's the same thing, no? He wouldn't have to go approaches, since that's a commercial multi thing, but he'd had to add it at least at the commercial or ATP level, because that's what he already has. At least, as far as I can tell. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ATP wants a single engine add on
The CLT multi-commercial should have been surrendered, do
they both have the same number and name. Have you checked on the FAA web site for his official ratings? "Emily" wrote in message ... | Dave S wrote: | My guess is that he is ex-mil... to account for the resume you've | listed. | | He is. Has never flown a single. | | It DOES sound weird tho.. You would think the ATP would override | the commercial multi CLT.. | | That's what I thought. Granted, he *could* just be carrying around the | invalid commercial, assuming it's still valid. Not sure what good it is. | | As for which one it adds on to: My guess is.. which ever one he wants.. | He can train for a ASEL ride to private, commercial or ATP standards | provided he has the time in type for the add-on. (havent looked at the | applicable reg for this one as to any required hours). | | I'm trying to make it make sense by thinking of it how I did it. I had | a commercial single and just added the multi on. I believe it's the | same thing, no? He wouldn't have to go approaches, since that's a | commercial multi thing, but he'd had to add it at least at the | commercial or ATP level, because that's what he already has. | | At least, as far as I can tell. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ATP wants a single engine add on
Jim Macklin wrote:
The CLT multi-commercial should have been surrendered, do they both have the same number and name. Have you checked on the FAA web site for his official ratings? He's opted out (or he's lying about being a pilot, but I've seen him walk off a commercial jet in uniform and with ID, so I'm guessing he's opted out). I'm guessing that when he got his ATP, he should have surrendered his commercial but didn't for some reason. I have a feeling it has to do with his military experience. So let me get this straight, if he adds on to the commercial (which I don't think he can do, since he shouldn't have one) it requires the training and signoffs, but if he adds on to the ATP, it doesn't? Can you point in me in the right direction for added on ATP ratings? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
ATP wants a single engine add on
Emily wrote:
I'm guessing that when he got his ATP, he should have surrendered his commercial but didn't for some reason. one pretty good reason not to surrender a certificate when you upgrade it, is if said certificate has a rating which you do not want to give up and which is not covered by the new certificate. Although this is not exactly germane to this discussion, I did keep my old private certificate (obtained under 61.75 (*)) even though I now have a commercial, because said private certificate still has my glider rating on it; could it be a similar situation? --Sylvain (*) before someone jumps all over me quoting 61.75(b)(3), whereby you cannot get a certificate under 61.75 if you already hold a US pilot certificate, nothing prevents you from keeping it after you get a US certificate. But I digress :-) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
ATP wants a single engine add on
Emily wrote: Jim Macklin wrote: He's opted out (or he's lying about being a pilot, but I've seen him walk off a commercial jet in uniform and with ID, so I'm guessing he's opted out). I've also run into situations where the pilot has a very unfortunate first name. I had a student once who's first name turned out to be Sherly, he went by "John". However, I believe (I need to double check) that you'll need to verify his passport before training per TSA. -Robert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
ATP wants a single engine add on
61.31 plus 61.39
c) A person is not required to comply with the provisions of paragraph (a)(6) of this section if that person: (1) Holds a foreign-pilot license issued by a contracting State to the Convention on International Civil Aviation that authorizes at least the pilot privileges of the airman certificate sought; (2) Is applying for a type rating only, or a class rating with an associated type rating; or (3) Is applying for an airline transport pilot certificate or an additional rating to an airline transport pilot certificate in an aircraft that does not require an aircraft type rating practical test. (d) If all increments of the practical test for a certificate or rating are not completed on one date, all remaining increments of the test must be satisfactorily completed not more than 60 calendar days after the date on which the applicant began the test. (e) If all increments of the practical test for a certificate or a rating are not satisfactorily completed within 60 calendar days after the date on which the applicant began the test, the applicant must retake the entire practical test, including those increments satisfactorily completed. [Doc. No. 25910, 62 FR 16298, Apr. 4, 1997; Amdt. 61-103, 62 FR 40897, July 30, 1997, as amended by Amdt. 61-104, 63 FR 20286, Apr. 23, 1998] ande 61.63. To add a SEL or SES rating as an ATP is much easier. "Emily" wrote in message . .. | Jim Macklin wrote: | The CLT multi-commercial should have been surrendered, do | they both have the same number and name. Have you checked | on the FAA web site for his official ratings? | | He's opted out (or he's lying about being a pilot, but I've seen him | walk off a commercial jet in uniform and with ID, so I'm guessing he's | opted out). | | I'm guessing that when he got his ATP, he should have surrendered his | commercial but didn't for some reason. I have a feeling it has to do | with his military experience. | | So let me get this straight, if he adds on to the commercial (which I | don't think he can do, since he shouldn't have one) it requires the | training and signoffs, but if he adds on to the ATP, it doesn't? Can | you point in me in the right direction for added on ATP ratings? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking to rent/share a six-seat single engine in NYC area | [email protected] | Owning | 0 | February 8th 05 01:01 PM |
V-8 powered Seabee | Corky Scott | Home Built | 212 | October 2nd 04 11:45 PM |
ROP masking of engine problems | Roger Long | Piloting | 1 | September 25th 04 07:13 PM |
Engines and Reliability | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 13 | June 30th 04 03:27 PM |
Autorotation ? R22 for the Experts | Eric D | Rotorcraft | 22 | March 5th 04 06:11 AM |