If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
New ASK-21prices
For that price you could come close to buying a Phoenix Motorglider.
Had a chance to check one out last Sept at Tehachapi. Unfortunately it veered off the runway while taxiing and sheared the main left wheel clean off at the ankle before I saw it fly. Interestingly, the wing never touched the ground despite being low mounted and resting at such an incline due to the polyhedral. Nice looking plane though... -Paul |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
New ASK-21prices
On Oct 21, 3:45*pm, bildan wrote:
On Oct 21, 2:00*pm, Mike the Strike wrote: On Oct 21, 10:32*am, "kirk.stant" wrote: I'm trying to build the case for my club to add a new (or mildly used) K-21 to our fleet. *Anyone have info on current prices? *This would be for delivery in the US (Right Coast)? Feel free to email me directly if desired. kirk dot stant at gmail dot com Cheers! Kirk 66 Eastern Sailplane show it on their website as 64,100 Euro + instruments, trailer and shipping. I think you'll be looking at around $125,000. Mike For a little perspective, in 1970 a new 2-33 sold for $23,000. *In inflated 2010 Dollars that would be $127,000.00 using the Consumer Price Index. *Of course, the ASK-21 is a little better glider. What was the hourly rental price for 2-33 and L-13 in the Seventies? Tow prices and instruction? How did that compare to the rental/ instruction in a Cessna 150? I bought a new 1974 Toyota Celica GT, 5- speed with air conditioning for $4,400.00 in September, 1974. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
New ASK-21prices
On Oct 21, 11:57*pm, bildan wrote:
I've flown both and while the PW-6 is a very nice glider, it's not in the same league as the ASK-21. "bildan" would you elaborate a little bit more on your's opinion. You stated that PW-6 is in the different league than K-21. Why? Since you flown both of them, I'm sure it will be easy to justified you conclusion. Could you share it with us ? Please. RRK |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
New ASK-21prices
On Oct 23, 12:53*am, RRK wrote:
On Oct 21, 11:57*pm, bildan wrote: I've flown both and while the PW-6 is a very nice glider, it's not in the same league as the ASK-21. "bildan" * * * * * * * would you elaborate a little bit more on your's opinion. You stated that *PW-6 is in the different league than K-21. Why? Since you flown both of them, *I'm sure it will be easy to justified you conclusion. Could you share it with us ? Please. RRK It's just my humble opinion. To me the ASK-21 feels more solid, more rugged. The ASK-21's larger wing seems to hold on to weak lift better and the controls are better harmonized. The 21's cockpit is bigger. I love the docile stall behavior. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
New ASK-21prices
Thanks to all the replies - both online and direct. Now comes the
hard part - convincing the old guard that it's time to retire the 2-33 and move on. As far as the suggestion to get a motorglider - not interested. It may be the perfect plane for some people & clubs, but not for ours. I've considered the PW-6 and looked at one (did not get to fly it, unfortunately) and it's an interesting little glider - second on my list. I confess to a lot of time in K-21s, including giving commercial acro rides, and really like the way it flies. And it's a tough ship - far stronger than the Grob 103, IMO. Again, thanks for the feedback; hopefully at some time in the future I'll be able to report the purchase of a new glider... Kirk 66 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
New ASK-21prices
On Oct 23, 10:54*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:
Thanks to all the replies - both online and direct. *Now comes the hard part - convincing the old guard that it's time to retire the 2-33 and move on. As far as the suggestion to get a motorglider - not interested. *It may be the perfect plane for some people & clubs, but not for ours. I've considered the PW-6 and looked at one (did not get to fly it, unfortunately) and it's an interesting little glider - second on my list. *I confess to a lot of time in K-21s, including giving commercial acro rides, and really like the way it flies. *And it's a tough ship - far stronger than the Grob 103, IMO. Again, thanks for the feedback; hopefully at some time in the future I'll be able to report the purchase of a new glider... Kirk 66 Last point. Often on ras people say that the 21 is a bad trainer because it can't stall or spin properly. The answer is, get the spin weights. I took ours out last weekend for spinning. (When giving a BFR, do something fun for the instructor!) With the spin weights on, it stalls and spins beautifully. With the spin weights off, the solo student is much less likely to get in trouble. The spin weights hang out in the breeze where you can't possibly fail to notice them. John Cochrane |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
New ASK-21prices
On Oct 22, 11:53*pm, RRK wrote:
On Oct 21, 11:57*pm, bildan wrote: I've flown both and while the PW-6 is a very nice glider, it's not in the same league as the ASK-21. "bildan" * * * * * * * would you elaborate a little bit more on your's opinion. You stated that *PW-6 is in the different league than K-21. Why? Since you flown both of them, *I'm sure it will be easy to justified you conclusion. Could you share it with us ? Please. RRK Two important (and somewhat related) factors to consider when making such a large investment are factory support and resale value. I have much more confidence that Schleicher will be around in 10 years than whoever is currently building PW5/PW6 as it seems this has changed on a semi-annual or so basis over the past 10 years. Such confidence will tend to keep resale values high. KJC |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
New ASK-21prices
On Oct 23, 9:54*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:
Thanks to all the replies - both online and direct. *Now comes the hard part - convincing the old guard that it's time to retire the 2-33 and move on. It's really inevitable. Whether it's an onerous AD or just members moving to clubs with better gliders, the 2-33's days are numbered. The trick is not to be the guys holding the bag when the 2-33 is grounded like the unfortunate L-13 owners. One ding or bit of corrosion in an unobtanium wing strut grounds a 2-33 - probably forever. The smart folks are moving on. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
New ASK-21prices
But, but, but, you could have a bakers dozen 2-33s for the price of
one ASK-21. Someone had to say it first. Good luck getting a club caught up to the present. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
New ASK-21prices
On Oct 23, 11:41*am, "
wrote: But, but, but, you could have a bakers dozen 2-33s for the price of one ASK-21. *Someone had to say it first. *Good luck getting a club caught up to the present. You could also probably build even more primary gliders for the same money but what's the point. Some clubs won't move on - they'll just die. I know of a couple of L-13 clubs which may not survive the grounding of that glider. That's a cautionary tale - don't get stuck with a grounded glider which has minimal factory support. I've been through this before. Back in the late 50's, most US clubs were flying WW2 training gliders like LK's, TG-3's or Pratt Reads. Why, clubs asked, should we abandon our $1000 gliders for then hugely expensive Schweizers? That was a difficult sell particularly since the WW2 trainers were actually much better gliders with a ~10 point L/ D advantage. In the end, the old wooden gliders just couldn't be maintained. The only alternative to the metal Schweizers were still more wooden gliders like the Ka-7, Kranich's or Bergfalke's from Germany. Given a US industrial base skilled in metal, Schweizer was the only game in town. Today, we have a wide choice of excellent trainers which are relatively speaking, no more expensive than Schweizers were then. Suck it up and write the check. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|