If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Pegasus or ....?
my 2 cents:
Pegasus is a very good choice. Excellent performance for the money. Pegasus is very typical of gliders of the late 70's mid 80's performance More deluxe than ASW19/20 with finished interior, lifting instrument panel like last ASW20 models offered, having owned (2)Pegasus, ASW19 and ASW20, and ASW20C would say they all handled and performed essentially the same.. obvious differences were flaps on 20's, Quality was similar, some better and worse on each. It doesn't have any bad habits. Well, keeping wings level in the early part of the takeoff run can be a bit of a challenge, especially in even the lightest crosswind. It also tends to drop the nose pretty dramatically and abruptly if you let speed bleed off in a slip. Otherwise I find it to be a very honest and relatively docile aircraft. Handling is excellent with very sensitive response in pitch and yaw (roll is a bit less enthusiastic, as is typical for this type of aircraft). Be prepared for some moderate PIO on the first takeoff or two. Assembly is very straightforward assuming spring-loaded sleeves have been retrofitted to aileron and spoiler connections, otherwise pinning these connections can be awkward. A sleeve can not be added to the elevator connection due to lack of space, but this connection is exposed enough that using a safety pin is not a problem. worst bad habit if you could call it that is manual hook-ups and lack of access...very difficult to verify safe control connections....assembly is slow and very unfriendly by comparison to better designs. Flying was not difficult or unusual....I never noticed any unusual or exciting take-offs in any of these, though I did with earlier ASW15's with offset CG hook....now those need attention! I do have a fair amont of glider experience though and may not recommend these gliders to lower time pilots since like any more-or-less modern racing gliders do things more quickly and less noticeable than club type gliders....all of these (ASW19/20/Pegasus) gliders can catch the sloppy flyer with an unplanned wingover and possibly a spin, probably moreso with ASW20 with flaps in use It is built like a tank, simple and parts are available through the factory without any issues whatsoever. If you speak French. actually I've called Centrair on a couple of occasions and had no difficulty in speaking with Mary Ann in English (actually her English was probably better than mine ) They are still or at least were, when I called last (about a year ago) very supportive of Pegasus owners, even in the USA but you can expect to wait for special parts, they are IMO a bit slow with delivering parts. Send me an email to jacek dot kobiesa at clearwire dot net to remained me of it and I will send you their contact. I bought from them hinges, hinge pins, pedals, etc. So, don't buy from anybody that lack of factory support nonsense. Support is available. Access to support for non-Francophones can be challenging. My best advice to a potential Peg owner is to learn enough French to be polite and have patience. It's no more difficult speaking English with people at Centrair than it is with the German companies, being polite with anyone gets you further than being rude or demanding. I am 6' 3" (1.9 meters) and 230 pounds (103.3 kilos). Aside from being a bit tight in the shoulders, my Peg fits me just fine with a backpack parachute. I do find the rudder pedals to be very narrow and have to fly wearing specialized driving shoes with narrow soles to fit my feet into the pedals. I also find that my knees fall exactly under the relatively sharp bottom edge of the instrument panel (I added some split rubber hose as "edge dressing" to provide a bit of cushioning). Rudder pedals are narrow and uncomfortable, there is little room for big feet in any of these and there was an ad to change out the rudder pedals in the pegasus (a not so pleasant operation to accomplish) and the new pedals were even narrower than the originals for whatever reason... The only item that I had an issue with is very weak wheel brake. I rebuild it in my glider with new shoes, springs, cable, and it was still marginal. I find the brake, operated by a motorcycle-like lever on the stick, acceptable when stopping from a slow roll, otherwise it's virtually useless. actually I never had an issue with the wheel brakes on any of these, the brakes were not overPowering, but if serviced and adjusted did an OK job of stoping the glider....but unmaintained you'll be very unhappy with the stopping power, they all use a reasonibly sized 5" wheel, much better than many gliders of the era still using very small light 4" wheels. But don't take my word for it: go and fly one, and then fly the LS-4, ASW-19, and whatever else you can and make your own decision. I just sold mine and I put on it last 2 seasons almost 200 hours. In my humble opinion, the Pegasus is a great aircraft and a good choice for moderately experienced pilots as a first high-performance or competition sailplane. I concour mostly....for the $ it's in the ball park, I'd say the LS gliders handle better and are more docile for relative equal perfomance and similar costs, quality is typical and no one should expect any of these mentioned gliders to be in perfect condition, all will have some issues with finish unless thay have been refinished, find one that has had the best care, the BEST TRAILER since this will have a great deal to do with enjoyment since assembly is going to be an issue, and check and DOUBLE check the control connections! tim Please visit the Wings & Wheels website at www.wingsandwheels.com Bill "TX" -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Pegasus or ....?
How does the Standard Cirrus compare to the Pegase and 19 in terms of
performance and handling? Dan |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Pegasus or ....?
I think the ASW-19 is suitable to low time pilots, as I started flying
my 19 at about 90 hours and 220 flights total experience (95% of that in 2-33s, 1-26s, L-13s and L-23s). The biggest transition problem for me was the CG hook and the need for careful approach speed control. With regard to manual control hook-ups, I don't find them to be a problem. It takes 20 seconds to connect the L'Hotelliers, and less than a minute to pin them. You can easily see things if you put your eye to the inspection hatch, and it's easy to manually verify through pushing the button while pulling and twisting to verify that they're properly engaged. True, manuals aren't the no-brainer that automatic hook-ups are. However, I've seen automatic hook-ups fail to engage and cause 5 minutes or so of frustration during wing assembly on LS and SH ships. Naturally, you MUST do a PCC with either type of hook-up! I can't speak from personal experience regarding the Pegasus, but the previous owner of my ship bought one. For what it's worth, he said the Pegasus flew like a truck in comparison to the ASW-19. -John |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Pegasus or ....?
Dan G wrote:
How does the Standard Cirrus compare to the Pegase and 19 in terms of performance and handling? Dan You can find a list of L/D for some gliders he http://www.soe.ucsc.edu/~mjboyd/cfi/...lidersCompared They give the Pegase at 41. The Open Cirrus at 44, but it is a 18m ship. The 15m one is given here at 38.5 in its best variant http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cirrus_(planeur) By comparison, there is a LS4 polar he http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr...lars/ls-4a.jpg which gives L/D at 40. I think it is roughly equivalent to the Pegase. An other comparison is the ASW19, information can be found he http://www.sailplanedirectory.com/schleich.htm and ASW19 is given with L/D at 38, that is basically like the standard Cirrus, and the ASW20 at 43. By the way, you can find the other manufacturers at the same place. -- Michel TALON |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Pegasus or ....?
Cats wrote:
On Nov 29, 3:22 am, "Bill" wrote: snip A sleeve can not be added to the elevator connection due to lack of space, but this connection is exposed enough that using a safety pin is not a problem. snip I've just brought one and the elevator is self-connecting - it's a 101a. If you can find one, go for a Pegase 90 - they are later than the 101 models and have automatic hook-ups for all controls. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Pegasus or ....?
not even in the same category.... keeping in mind you are speaking of quite
an evolutionally jump, much was learned in construction technique, better airfoils and to a lesser degree performance. Std Cirrus is in the generation of ASW15, LS1, Libelle and a few others in this group I would personally rate the LS1 and best handling, easiest to fly (I'm speaking of LS1f only) Libelle (my personal favorite) was best design, innovation, easiest to assemble and just all around great design for the time....production numbers seem to prove this also. Std Cirrus, ASW15 and earlier LS1 fall below the head of the class in all of these areas. my last 2 cents tim Please visit the Wings & Wheels website at www.wingsandwheels.com "Dan G" wrote in message ... How does the Standard Cirrus compare to the Pegase and 19 in terms of performance and handling? Dan |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Pegasus or ....?
With regard to manual control hook-ups, I don't find them to be a problem. It takes 20 seconds to connect the L'Hotelliers, and less than a minute to pin them. You can easily see things if you put your eye to the inspection hatch, and it's easy to manually verify through pushing the button while pulling and twisting to verify that they're properly engaged. must be you're not yet over 50 and into the bifocal user's group....with Popeye forearms going into tiny hatch opening connections are essentially in brail, with bright sun looking onto a white fuselage with a black hole to inspect the connections even making the connetion, say nothing of safety pins in almost guesswork... I know few who can say that they never missed a connection at least once....double and triple check them! I can't speak from personal experience regarding the Pegasus, but the previous owner of my ship bought one. For what it's worth, he said the Pegasus flew like a truck in comparison to the ASW-19. must have been a really nice ASW19 and a really bad Pegasus! They are essentially the same with modified non-flapped 20 wings on the Pegasus.....The Pegasus probably then I guess flys more like a 20 than it does a 19. tim -John |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Pegasus or ....?
On 29 Nov, 17:41, "Tim Mara" wrote:
must have been a really nice ASW19 and a really bad Pegasus! They are essentially the same with modified non-flapped 20 wings on the Pegasus.....The Pegasus probably then I guess flys more like a 20 than it does a 19. I don't think I ever flew a 19, but I did a fair few hours in a Pegasus one summer. Lovely thing, I thought - I was told that the wings are far bendier than 19 ones. Which may mean better energy transfer or a worse ride, depending on where one flies... Ian |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Pegasus or ....?
On Nov 29, 12:41 pm, "Tim Mara" wrote:
With regard to manual control hook-ups, I don't find them to be a problem. It takes 20 seconds to connect the L'Hotelliers, and less than a minute to pin them. You can easily see things if you put your eye to the inspection hatch, and it's easy to manually verify through pushing the button while pulling and twisting to verify that they're properly engaged. must be you're not yet over 50 and into the bifocal user's group....with Popeye forearms going into tiny hatch opening connections are essentially in brail, with bright sun looking onto a white fuselage with a black hole to inspect the connections even making the connetion, say nothing of safety pins in almost guesswork... I know few who can say that they never missed a connection at least once....double and triple check them! No, almost 60 years young, and I've been wearing bifocals for over 15 years. But then I don't look at the connections until I'm done. I just grab the control rods and hook up the L'Hotelliers, followed by putting the safety pins into their holes. I don't find it that hard... As for checking, there I do look for proper connection and the pins by placing my face on the fuselage and shielding my eyes from the outside light. I also have someone else do a crtical assembly check, in which I ask that they look for the pins and pull on them to make sure they're engaged. I can't speak from personal experience regarding the Pegasus, but the previous owner of my ship bought one. For what it's worth, he said the Pegasus flew like a truck in comparison to the ASW-19. must have been a really nice ASW19 and a really bad Pegasus! They are essentially the same with modified non-flapped 20 wings on the Pegasus.....The Pegasus probably then I guess flys more like a 20 than it does a 19. Again, it's not my experience. The man flew the ASW-19 for 21 years, and was definitely underwhelmed by the Pegasus. I guess it's as they say, YMMV. -John |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Pegasus or ....?
On Nov 29, 5:17 pm, Martin Gregorie
wrote: Cats wrote: On Nov 29, 3:22 am, "Bill" wrote: snip A sleeve can not be added to the elevator connection due to lack of space, but this connection is exposed enough that using a safety pin is not a problem. snip I've just brought one and the elevator is self-connecting - it's a 101a. If you can find one, go for a Pegase 90 - they are later than the 101 models and have automatic hook-ups for all controls. I've got what I've got - I'll get on with flying it! And I'm suspecting I'll never need another glider, unless I manage to break it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pegasus fo sale ? | Jean | Soaring | 1 | February 21st 07 03:44 AM |
Pegasus time limit | [email protected] | Soaring | 38 | February 14th 07 08:35 AM |
Pegasus instrument panel | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | November 1st 06 11:42 PM |
FS: Pegasus | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | October 4th 05 10:05 PM |
Pegasus AD | [email protected] | Soaring | 9 | August 29th 05 12:03 AM |