A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Does China have long range bombers?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 22nd 04, 03:17 AM
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Does China have long range bombers?

Does China have long range bombers at this time that can reach the
continental United States?

Although they have nuclear bombs, what about the planes to deliver
them?

I know China had some TU-16 planes years ago, but did they ever
develop long range bombers or get any from the former Soviet Union?

And what about China's in-air refueling capability?
  #2  
Old May 22nd 04, 08:28 AM
The Enlightenment
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike" wrote in message
om...
Does China have long range bombers at this time that can reach the
continental United States?

Although they have nuclear bombs, what about the planes to deliver
them?

I know China had some TU-16 planes years ago, but did they ever
develop long range bombers or get any from the former Soviet Union?

And what about China's in-air refueling capability?


China is focusing on its economic development and improving its
technology. It is focusing on the region. They are no doubt capable
of expanding their ability to project military power great distances.
Their people are industrious, patriotic and intelligent. For the
moment they are in no great hurry. I expect they will wait until they
have gained power and the US has reduced. It seems to me that the
rapid deindustrialisation and outsourcing of the US will eventually
degrade the US's power and ability to create weaponry and fund wars.
The middle empire will then be capable of expanding its influence in
the world. The US's involvement in the Middle east is seen by some
as an attempt to reform the region in a similar way the Jacobeans
sought to change Europe or in a similar way that France under Napoleon
III sought to 'liberate' Europe in such a way that France would be
central to Europe and would consist of nations attached by gratitude
and admiration to France. (they go their asses kicked in the Franco
Prussian war incidentally)

I think it will backfire. I think this pseudo roman empire will drain
the US rather than secure it.


  #3  
Old May 22nd 04, 09:44 AM
Jeroen Wenting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Does China have long range bombers at this time that can reach the
continental United States?

China has Tu-16 bombers which might be able to reach Alaska and maybe parts
of the US west coast on a suicide (read, one-way) mission.
They are rumoured to have at least a few Tu-22M (Tu-26) Backfires as well
which could reach the US west coast.

Although they have nuclear bombs, what about the planes to deliver
them?

Certainly.
Not to mention ICBMs which can reach parts of the US and several (at least
1, possibly 3 or more) SSBNs with 8+ MIRVed SLBMs each.

I know China had some TU-16 planes years ago, but did they ever
develop long range bombers or get any from the former Soviet Union?

Tu-16 both from the USSR and built by themselves. I guess they've improved
on them for better range by now to reach the US.
They can certainly reach Moscow...

And what about China's in-air refueling capability?

Limited.

China is not much of a nuclear threat to CONUS, but the northwest is at risk
as are forces in theater (Korea, Japan, Philipines, Thailand, Malaysia,
Singapore, etc.).

Draw a circle centered on central China and reaching to Moscow and you have
the range (approximately) where the PRC can project their nuclear weapons
to.


  #4  
Old May 22nd 04, 09:59 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Although they have nuclear bombs, what about the planes to deliver
them?


This is, after all, 1950s technology. The Chinese are into missiles,
not manned bombers.

(No doubt they have some capable of delivering bombs to Taiwan.)



all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org
  #5  
Old May 22nd 04, 10:02 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 22 May 2004 07:28:54 GMT, "The Enlightenment"
wrote:

It seems to me that the
rapid deindustrialisation and outsourcing of the US will eventually
degrade the US's power and ability to create weaponry and fund wars.


The same way that de-agriculturalizing the economy did in the 19th and
20th centuries?

(You-all recall how the U.S. wasn't able to feed its soldiers during
World War Two.... No farmers!)

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org
  #8  
Old May 23rd 04, 12:52 PM
Errol Cavit
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 22 May 2004 07:28:54 GMT, "The Enlightenment"
wrote:

It seems to me that the
rapid deindustrialisation and outsourcing of the US will eventually
degrade the US's power and ability to create weaponry and fund wars.


The same way that de-agriculturalizing the economy did in the 19th and
20th centuries?

(You-all recall how the U.S. wasn't able to feed its soldiers during
World War Two.... No farmers!)


So does anyone have the list of what was supplied by reverse lend-lease? Any
idea how much this was different from pre-war levels of imports?


--
Errol Cavit |
Our birth and death are likened to / Each daily morn and eve.
And seasons too, their annual round; / Why should we weep and grieve?
from "Transition", Herbert Cavit 1916 - 2004


  #9  
Old May 23rd 04, 06:14 PM
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jeroen Wenting" wrote in message ...
Does China have long range bombers at this time that can reach the
continental United States?

China has Tu-16 bombers which might be able to reach Alaska and maybe parts
of the US west coast on a suicide (read, one-way) mission.
They are rumoured to have at least a few Tu-22M (Tu-26) Backfires as well
which could reach the US west coast.


Wow, China may have a few backfires? They could easily hit Los
Angeles if that was the case. That's scary.


Although they have nuclear bombs, what about the planes to deliver
them?

Certainly.
Not to mention ICBMs which can reach parts of the US and several (at least
1, possibly 3 or more) SSBNs with 8+ MIRVed SLBMs each.

I know China had some TU-16 planes years ago, but did they ever
develop long range bombers or get any from the former Soviet Union?

Tu-16 both from the USSR and built by themselves. I guess they've improved
on them for better range by now to reach the US.
They can certainly reach Moscow...

And what about China's in-air refueling capability?

Limited.

China is not much of a nuclear threat to CONUS, but the northwest is at risk
as are forces in theater (Korea, Japan, Philipines, Thailand, Malaysia,
Singapore, etc.).

Draw a circle centered on central China and reaching to Moscow and you have
the range (approximately) where the PRC can project their nuclear weapons
to.

  #10  
Old May 23rd 04, 08:56 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike" wrote in message
om...
"Jeroen Wenting" wrote in message

...
Does China have long range bombers at this time that can reach the
continental United States?

China has Tu-16 bombers which might be able to reach Alaska and maybe

parts
of the US west coast on a suicide (read, one-way) mission.
They are rumoured to have at least a few Tu-22M (Tu-26) Backfires as

well
which could reach the US west coast.


Wow, China may have a few backfires? They could easily hit Los
Angeles if that was the case. That's scary.


Even at the most generous estimates of its range the Backfire
would need multiple in flight refuellings to strike at that
kind of range.

Keith


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Long range Wx Paul kgyy Instrument Flight Rules 4 December 31st 04 04:25 PM
Night of the bombers - the most daring special mission of Finnishbombers in WW2 Jukka O. Kauppinen Military Aviation 4 March 22nd 04 11:19 PM
Soviet Escort of American Bombers??? Stephen Harding Military Aviation 10 March 21st 04 03:50 AM
Long Range Spitfires??? ArtKramr Military Aviation 3 September 9th 03 10:05 PM
Helicopter gun at LONG range Gordon Military Aviation 17 August 20th 03 02:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.