If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
"Stefan" wrote in message ... Dave Stadt wrote: I suspect most pilots don't know separation is not provided in Class D. I've always thought that you must pass a written to get your certificate? Or do most pilots just learn the answers by heart without understanding them? Stefan You must pass a written test but there is no requirement to pass with a perfect score or to remember any of it for any length of time. It is also not the kind of thing I have ever been asked during a BFR. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: When you've got a guy directing traffic who has a faulty mental picture of the traffic in the airspace -- often through no fault of his own -- you've got a recipe for trouble. Agreed. If pilots reported their positions accurately the controller wouldn't *think* he knew where they were. He'd know. In my experience, the controllers at BFM tower have always refused to offer traffic avoidance instructions unless they have all the relevant aircraft in sight. They *might* pass along position reports, but that's it. Now that they have DBRITE, they know where the aircraft really are, but I haven't detected any change in the way they handle airplanes they're talking to. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:HJFUd.12332$r55.8014@attbi_s52... You really should be scared of class D airports. Totally agree. I'll take uncontrolled over non-radar Class Delta, any day. Really? All that money spent on controllers is wasted? At least in class D, everyone is *supposed* to be on the radio, although of course vigilance is always necessary. I think what you are really saying is that danger goes up as the traffic density increases, and class D tends to be busier than uncontrolled fields. I'd take a class D early in the morning when no one is around any day! Tony (not the same person as Avweb reported today as facing the clink for falsifying his pilot certificate application!) |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
"Stefan" wrote: I suspect most pilots don't know separation is not provided in Class D. I've always thought that you must pass a written to get your certificate? Or do most pilots just learn the answers by heart without understanding them? The list of things I didn't know about flying when I got my private ticket would have filled a lot of exam books. Eight years and nearly 1,000 hours later, I suspect the list is still quite long. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
"Tony Cox" wrote in message ink.net... "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:HJFUd.12332$r55.8014@attbi_s52... You really should be scared of class D airports. Totally agree. I'll take uncontrolled over non-radar Class Delta, any day. Really? All that money spent on controllers is wasted? In some cases, yes. At least in class D, everyone is *supposed* to be on the radio, although of course vigilance is always necessary. I think what you are really saying is that danger goes up as the traffic density increases, and class D tends to be busier than uncontrolled fields. I'd take a class D early in the morning when no one is around any day! The non towered airport I fly out of (home base for 350 + aircraft)is busier than most Class D airports, has 6 runways with 3 frequently in use at one time, has a ton of NORDO aircraft and is much better behaved than a lot of class D airports I have been to. Most close call or worse horror stories I have experienced and heard involved someone in a tower with a radio and no radar. Tony (not the same person as Avweb reported today as facing the clink for falsifying his pilot certificate application!) |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
In a word, Yes.
Not very long ago I witnessed a near miss. I filed a complaint with the FAA annonymously via the internet. They called the airport to see who was flying at the time. Well, since it happened a hour after the admin building closed... The FAA tends to get lazy at times. Meanwhile, had the two aircraft collided, I would have possibly been immolated in my car. There was a plane in the process of departing and I thought he was trying to be cute the way he began a turn as soon as he rotated (get some Navy types now and then). Then I noticed another a/c making a hard right turn, right over me who had been on final. Had they collided, I was close enough, on the high-way that runs past the end of the runway, to have been part of the ensuing gas shower and fire. I have had similar things happen with biz jets as you have just mentioned. They get so busy with all their stuff that they forget there are others getting clearances as well. Seems that because of a biz jet that was in a hurry, I wound up with having to do an intersection departure to keep approach happy (we were at a non-towered field with an RCO). Why? because the biz jet cut me off as I was taxiing to the runway! So yes, I would at least file an ASRA about it. Later, Steve.T PP ASEL/Instrument |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
"Stefan" wrote in message ... I remember my first landing at a controlled airport with heavy iron. (Got my primary training at a small grass strip.) I was told by the tower to continue my approach. The runway was empty. But the very moment I turned base to final, which is about 1/2 mile from the threshold at that airport (Zürich), I saw to my surprize a 737 rolling onto the runway and lining up, obviously cleared by the tower to do so. When I was about 1/4 mile out, I got uneasy and called the tower, asking what to do. "Continue approach, the airliner will depart." And so it did. Plenty of room, a non event. Stefan Hi Stefan. I've never piloted heavy iron, so feel free to adjust the numbers. Let's say you were 1/4 mile out travelling at 120 knots. If my math is right, that's about 7.5 seconds to a collision. That's barely enough time to call the tower and get a response. I would have considered going around. I understand going around with a heavy is a big deal. Last year we had 30G50 at our local class D and I saw a 737 go around because it couldn't hit a 6500 x 150 ft. (1996 x 46 m) runway. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
. com... "Tony Cox" wrote in message ink.net... At least in class D, everyone is *supposed* to be on the radio, although of course vigilance is always necessary. I think what you are really saying is that danger goes up as the traffic density increases, and class D tends to be busier than uncontrolled fields. I'd take a class D early in the morning when no one is around any day! The non towered airport I fly out of (home base for 350 + aircraft)is busier than most Class D airports, has 6 runways with 3 frequently in use at one time, has a ton of NORDO aircraft and is much better behaved than a lot of class D airports I have been to. Most close call or worse horror stories I have experienced and heard involved someone in a tower with a radio and no radar. Interesting, isn't it? On the one hand, being "uncontrolled" will hopefully put the fear of God into pilots so they are more vigilant (yes, I know that being "controlled" shouldn't make a difference). On the other, I *suspect* that uncontrolled fields tend to attract the less active pilots, more intimidated by radio work, who might not be as "on the ball" as they should be. It'd be interesting to see a comparison of mid-airs, corrected for traffic density. I suspect the correction for traffic density would be non-trivial. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
"Stefan" wrote in message ... I've always thought that you must pass a written to get your certificate? Or do most pilots just learn the answers by heart without understanding them? Stefan It's one thing to know the anwsers to an exam and another thing to apply this knowledge. This was brought home to me by an experience about 2 weeks after I got my ticket. I was doing touch and goes at my home field and ATC cleared a plane for takeoff on a crossing runway; the timing was such that our paths would have crossed as I was on downwind for my runway. Now I knew that ATC is not responsible for separation of VFR aircraft in class D, but this brought home to me that ATC could clear aircraft on a midair collision course and bear no responsibility should there be an accident. By the way, I made the wrong decision and continued the pattern; we saw each other in time to avoid a collision. The right move would have been to ask for the opposite pattern for that "go" (read "inform ATC that I intended to fly the opposite pattern" ) or extend downwind until the other aircraft departed. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Stadt" writes:
"Peter R." wrote in message ... Perhaps some pilots, thinking ATC has a complete handle on traffic, might let their "see and avoid" guard down a little when flying into a towered airport. Many totally quit looking once they start talking to the tower. It's a horrible mistake and I suspect most pilots don't know separation is not provided in Class D. I similarly suspect many pilots don't know vfr/vfr separation isn't provided in Class C either. Dan. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Please help -- It's down to the wire | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 12 | July 14th 04 06:05 PM |
Please help -- It's down to the wire | Jay Honeck | Owning | 24 | July 14th 04 06:05 PM |
Rules on what can be in a hangar | Brett Justus | Owning | 13 | February 27th 04 05:35 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |