If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Free plans? Open source plans?
The first question is really simple: Are there any free plans for
homebuilt aircraft on the web? It should have an engine and be able to carry a person, apart from that I'm just interested in seeing what's out there, if any... The second question/idea is a bit far out: Are there any "open source" projects? It's obviously extremely difficult to exchange parts of airplanes across the web, but people could develop something together and everyone builds his or her own plane from the plans that come out of this (and even those not building could bring in their expertise). I know this is not computer software (even for a model airplane it could work well), but has something like this been undertaken? Is it feasible? Oliver |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Free plans? Open source plans?
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:48:28 -0800 (PST), Oliver Arend
wrote: The first question is really simple: Are there any free plans for homebuilt aircraft on the web? It should have an engine and be able to carry a person, apart from that I'm just interested in seeing what's out there, if any... Texas Parasol, courtesy of our own Richard Lamb: http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/...et.03.04.2006/ The second question/idea is a bit far out: Are there any "open source" projects? It's obviously extremely difficult to exchange parts of airplanes across the web, but people could develop something together and everyone builds his or her own plane from the plans that come out of this (and even those not building could bring in their expertise). I know this is not computer software (even for a model airplane it could work well), but has something like this been undertaken? Is it feasible? One of the RAH folks was part of a group of 13 people who built fourteen examples of a given plans-built design at the same time. There were people who were designated decision-makers, but everyone still tried to go their own way and make changes, "improve" portions, and generally go against the rest of the group. The fall of Saigon sounds like it had been quieter. Couldn't imagine trying to actually *design* an airplane in such an environment. You'll end up with folks pushing their own versions, with no knowledge of their qualifications to do the design or even whether they've tried it themselves. For a small airplane, for good or for bad, you need *one* designer. If you don't like the way he does it, you're free to change it, but you don't get the opportunity to push your version in front of his. Compared to a software product, an airplane is a very long-term affair. Bad decisions early can lead to death years later. Ron Wanttaja |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Free plans? Open source plans?
The second question/idea is a bit far out: Are there any "open source"
projects? It's obviously extremely difficult to exchange parts of airplanes across the web, but people could develop something together and everyone builds his or her own plane from the plans that come out of this (and even those not building could bring in their expertise). I know this is not computer software (even for a model airplane it could work well), but has something like this been undertaken? Is it feasible? Oliver If open source airplane designs worked like open source software I wouldn't go near the end product -- because my life would depend on it. And if I ever find out open source software is running aircraft systems I won't fly on it. But of course that will never happen. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Free plans? Open source plans?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Free plans? Open source plans?
Ernest Christley wrote:
cavalamb himself wrote: Almost ALL experimental Amateur built airplanes would qualify as open source... Truer words have never been spoken. I don't know what sockpuppet61 has against enthusiast checking over and correcting each other's work, improving it and sharing their improvements, but he obviously hasn't a clue what can be accomplished in this way. I'm a full-time, won't-touch-Windows-any-more, Linux man. I use it for both work and play, and it's performance is stellar. The point is that if something goes wrong, I can (and have) go into the source code and fix it. Now, socketpuppet61 may not be able to, because he probably isn't a software engineer, but the fact is that it can be done. I would trust open-source that I could audit long before closed-source. As a matter of fact, I'm doing exactly that. My engine controller will be a Megasquirt unit that comes as a kit with open source software. It was designed for cars, so I will be modifying it to make it more appropriate for airplane use (mostly just making it simpler). Amateur built airplanes are the same way. You have the plans. You can change anything you like. The whole RV line began, because VanGrueson had an airplane that he liked...except for a few handling issues. Can't remember the name of the predecessor, and I think I mangled Van's name, but he had the education, training, skill AND opportunity to fix what he thought were the problems. The result is the all-time most successful line of kit built airplanes. As Ron mentioned, the problem with having people sit down and draw up a design is that you don't know who's qualified and the end result won't be seen for years. (With software, the end result can be produced in minutes.) We do have open-source, though, in that you can cruise down the homebuilt line at the fly-ins and take pictures of what you consider good ideas. Talk to the builders and get their opinion of how their modifications worked out. Maybe click through their web logs to see what they're doing, and how they're doing it. You'll still need to get a set of plans for the overall design, but you'll never be limited to JUST what is in that one set of plans. Ernest, If I could find a comfortable CAD program for Linux, I'd join ya. Richard |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Free plans? Open source plans?
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:48:28 -0800 (PST), Oliver Arend
wrote: The first question is really simple: Are there any free plans for homebuilt aircraft on the web? It should have an engine and be able to carry a person, apart from that I'm just interested in seeing what's out there, if any... The second question/idea is a bit far out: Are there any "open source" projects? It's obviously extremely difficult to exchange parts of airplanes across the web, but people could develop something together and everyone builds his or her own plane from the plans that come out of this (and even those not building could bring in their expertise). I know this is not computer software (even for a model airplane it could work well), but has something like this been undertaken? Is it feasible? Oliver oliver your innocence has hidden something important from you. the paper drawing is merely an implementation of a design. what you must have and understand for designs that you build from anonymous sources is the design calculations. these match the material strengths and the structural layout to the predicted flight loads. without these you have no idea what you are building. if you are interested in a design then ask whether there were design calculations. if there arent you need to develop the understanding needed to do reverse engineering calcs for your self. Stealth Pilot |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Free plans? Open source plans?
On Jan 25, 7:13*pm, wrote:
The second question/idea is a bit far out: Are there any "open source" projects? It's obviously extremely difficult to exchange parts of airplanes across the web, but people could develop something together and everyone builds his or her own plane from the plans that come out of this (and even those not building could bring in their expertise). I know this is not computer software (even for a model airplane it could work well), but has something like this been undertaken? Is it feasible? Oliver If open source airplane designs worked like open source software I wouldn't go near the end product -- because my life would depend on it. And if I ever find out open source software is running aircraft systems I won't fly on it. But of course that will never happen. I would sooner fly with open source software running my aircraft than anything put out by Microsoft or Apple. Nothing would put the fear of flying into me more than thinking that I was dependent on anything put out by those to companies. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Free plans? Open source plans?
On Jan 25, 10:16*pm, cavalamb himself wrote:
wrote: The second question/idea is a bit far out: Are there any "open source" projects? It's obviously extremely difficult to exchange parts of airplanes across the web, but people could develop something together and everyone builds his or her own plane from the plans that come out of this (and even those not building could bring in their expertise). I know this is not computer software (even for a model airplane it could work well), but has something like this been undertaken? Is it feasible? Oliver If open source airplane designs worked like open source software I wouldn't go near the end product -- because my life would depend on it. And if I ever find out open source software is running aircraft systems I won't fly on it. But of course that will never happen. Almost ALL experimental Amateur built airplanes would qualify as open source...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - When you get right down to it....the aviation industry has been open source since it began. All the advancements in aviation design have been largely improvements on prior designs. Hell, even Rutans designs are throwbacks to the Wright Brothers. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Free plans? Open source plans?
"BobR" wrote When you get right down to it....the aviation industry has been open source since it began. All the advancements in aviation design have been largely improvements on prior designs. Hell, even Rutans designs are throwbacks to the Wright Brothers. That's putting it a bit too simplistic, don't you think? Wright brothers didn't use a stiff outer skin of cloth and resin to carry the loads, did they? How about a feathering tail on a spaceship? If you want to put it that way, Leonardo Da Vinci was copied by the Wright Brothers. -- Jim in NC |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Free plans? Open source plans?
oliver your innocence has hidden something important from you.
Not exactly, as I've been studying aerospace engineering for about 5 years now. I know, unfortunately that's no proof of knowledge, experience or wisdom... what you must have and understand for designs that you build from anonymous sources is the design calculations. This could easily be integrated into an open source aircraft project, don't you think? You take the structural members of the wing, the flaps, whichever component (I know it becomes very tricky for certain parts), do the calcs, and if it holds up you draw up the plan. If it doesn't, back to the design. This way the other participants could at least theoretically verify what one has designed. And if you have a decent number of participants, there will hardly be any points missed. Imagine an open- source plane flying as well as Wikipedia compares to "regular" encyclopedias like the Enc. Britannica or the Brockhaus. Oliver |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Long EZ plans, Mini IMP plans, F4U Corsair plans, materials, instruments for sale | reader | Home Built | 1 | January 26th 11 01:40 AM |
Open-source flight/space simuators for Linux | Timothy Stark | Simulators | 0 | July 8th 07 03:37 AM |
Duster Plans For Sale - BJ-1b fullsize sailplane plans | WoodHawk | Soaring | 0 | April 25th 05 04:37 AM |
want to trade 601 plans for 701 plans | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | January 27th 05 07:50 PM |
Free aircraft plans? | Gil G. | Home Built | 0 | July 23rd 03 04:18 PM |