OSH '04 -- Best ever?

In article ,
Ron Wanttaja wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:37:55 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote:


"B2431" wrote

I got a charge out of it.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Y'all keep this up, and you will galvanize public opinion, like a lightning
rod.

Is it too late to coloumb to the bandwagon?

Ron Wanttaja


Consider yourselves warned.

I have the capacity for a near-unlimited number of such remarks.

Some will get a charge out of them, others will merely find them shocking.

I've got so many of them, I was crowned King Faraday.

On 10 Aug 2004 20:15:51 -0700, ChuckSlusarczyk
wrote:

In article , John Ammeter says...


Please no MHO...

John

Come on you guys "Watts" up with thread? :-)

Chuck ("ohm" just one of the guys) S

Not since your induction into the hall of fame. I know that was bad
but I couldn't resist.


================================================== ==
Del Rawlins--
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply

Del Rawlins wrote:

Please no MHO...

John

Come on you guys "Watts" up with thread? :-)

Chuck ("ohm" just one of the guys) S


Not since your induction into the hall of fame. I know that was bad
but I couldn't resist.

Ampere joule agree this has gone too far.

King Faraday wrote:
In article ,
Ron Wanttaja wrote:

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:37:55 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote:


"B2431" wrote

I got a charge out of it.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Y'all keep this up, and you will galvanize public opinion, like a lightning
rod.

Is it too late to coloumb to the bandwagon?

Ron Wanttaja



Consider yourselves warned.

I have the capacity for a near-unlimited number of such remarks.

Some will get a charge out of them, others will merely find them shocking.

I've got so many of them, I was crowned King Faraday.




I found the thread electrifying at first, but now it just leaves me drained.


Matt

"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

I found the thread electrifying at first, but now it just leaves me
drained.


Don't be so negative!

Rich S.

On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:10:51 -0400, nafod40
wrote:

Del Rawlins wrote:

Please no MHO...

John

Come on you guys "Watts" up with thread? :-)

Chuck ("ohm" just one of the guys) S


Not since your induction into the hall of fame. I know that was bad
but I couldn't resist.

Ampere joule agree this has gone too far.

Anode when I posted to this thread it was winding down, and diode it
to you all to shunt the hell up but I acted purely out of impulse.

================================================== ==
Del Rawlins--
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply

In article ,
Matt Whiting wrote:
King Faraday wrote:
In article ,
Ron Wanttaja wrote:

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:37:55 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote:


"B2431" wrote

I got a charge out of it.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Y'all keep this up, and you will galvanize public opinion, like a lightning
rod.

Is it too late to coloumb to the bandwagon?

Ron Wanttaja



Consider yourselves warned.

I have the capacity for a near-unlimited number of such remarks.

Some will get a charge out of them, others will merely find them shocking.

I've got so many of them, I was crowned King Faraday.

I found the thread electrifying at first, but now it just leaves me drained.

This brand of humor, on this subject, is popular enough to have a national
holiday in it's honor. People did get a little staticky when it was named
Coloumbus Day Appropriate though, it all started with the Queen's joules.

It's ampere-ically self-evident -- A.C. jokes are RE-volt-ing.

Then there was the guy who paid by credit-card for the modification to the
hybrid vacuum-tube/field-effect-transistor circuit -- when his next AMEX
statement came, he had a current charge for the tap on the grid-leak being
diverted to the sink and thence to the drain.

Coloumbus Day Appropriate though, it all started with the Queen's joules.

What a revoltin' development!