Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense.

In an 8 to 1 decision the scotus kicked Bush on the ass for his trashing of the
Bill of Rights. It is about time Bush was placed on the slippery slope he so
well desreves. Thank you SCOTUS. Even the neocons have had enough of him


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
In an 8 to 1 decision the scotus kicked Bush on the ass for his trashing
of the
Bill of Rights. It is about time Bush was placed on the slippery slope he
so
well desreves. Thank you SCOTUS. Even the neocons have had enough of him



What a strange conclusion! I'm not sure who these neocons are you keep
mentioning (and I bet you don't know either, it's probably just a new catch
phrase you learned and like to use to avoid having to try to express complex
ideas) but the Supreme Court has ruled against the government many times
over the last few years. What makes this ruling so significant?

The ruling is pretty complicated. You can read some of the details he
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...3350_2004jun28

Jarg

Subject: Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense.
From: "Jarg"
Date: 6/29/2004 9:28 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
In an 8 to 1 decision the scotus kicked Bush on the ass for his trashing
of the
Bill of Rights. It is about time Bush was placed on the slippery slope he
so
well desreves. Thank you SCOTUS. Even the neocons have had enough of him



What a strange conclusion! I'm not sure who these neocons are you keep
mentioning (and I bet you don't know either, it's probably just a new catch
phrase you learned and like to use to avoid having to try to express complex
ideas) but the Supreme Court has ruled against the government many times
over the last few years. What makes this ruling so significant?

The ruling is pretty complicated. You can read some of the details he

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp.../washpost/2004
0629/ts_washpost/a13350_2004jun28

Jarg

Bush's defense was that in time of war balance of powers no longer exist and
the president as commander in chief has final word on all issues. SCOTUS said
"war does not give the president a blank check to go outside the constitution
and the bill of rights.". That slaps down Bush's delusions of grandeur.



Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense.
From: "Jarg"
Date: 6/29/2004 9:28 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
In an 8 to 1 decision the scotus kicked Bush on the ass for his
trashing
of the
Bill of Rights. It is about time Bush was placed on the slippery slope
he
so
well desreves. Thank you SCOTUS. Even the neocons have had enough of
him



What a strange conclusion! I'm not sure who these neocons are you keep
mentioning (and I bet you don't know either, it's probably just a new
catch
phrase you learned and like to use to avoid having to try to express
complex
ideas) but the Supreme Court has ruled against the government many times
over the last few years. What makes this ruling so significant?

The ruling is pretty complicated. You can read some of the details he

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp.../washpost/2004
0629/ts_washpost/a13350_2004jun28

Jarg

Bush's defense was that in time of war balance of powers no longer exist
and
the president as commander in chief has final word on all issues.


Could you provide a reference for this contention? I have never heard
anything like this from President Bush myself. The description of the court
decision doens't mention it either. The ruling was regarding the legal
rights of enemy combatants.


SCOTUS said
"war does not give the president a blank check to go outside the
constitution
and the bill of rights.". That slaps down Bush's delusions of grandeur.



Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

That slaps down Bush's delusions of grandeur.

The only one here with delusions of grandeur is you, Art.

Subject: Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense.
From: "Jarg"
Date: 6/29/2004 10:37 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense.
From: "Jarg"
Date: 6/29/2004 9:28 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
In an 8 to 1 decision the scotus kicked Bush on the ass for his
trashing
of the
Bill of Rights. It is about time Bush was placed on the slippery slope
he
so
well desreves. Thank you SCOTUS. Even the neocons have had enough of
him



What a strange conclusion! I'm not sure who these neocons are you keep
mentioning (and I bet you don't know either, it's probably just a new
catch
phrase you learned and like to use to avoid having to try to express
complex
ideas) but the Supreme Court has ruled against the government many times
over the last few years. What makes this ruling so significant?

The ruling is pretty complicated. You can read some of the details he

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp.../washpost/2004
0629/ts_washpost/a13350_2004jun28

Jarg

Bush's defense was that in time of war balance of powers no longer exist
and
the president as commander in chief has final word on all issues.


Could you provide a reference for this contention? I have never heard
anything like this from President Bush myself. The description of the court
decision doens't mention it either. The ruling was regarding the legal
rights of enemy combatants.


SCOTUS said
"war does not give the president a blank check to go outside the
constitution
and the bill of rights.". That slaps down Bush's delusions of grandeur.



Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer


Read the caselaw


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense.
From: "Jarg"
Date: 6/29/2004 10:37 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


http://www.coastcomp.com

Read the caselaw


That's it? You make these claims and then you can't provide any supporting
citations? Your already limited credibility continues to drop.

Jarg

Subject: Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense.
From: "Jarg"
Date: 6/29/2004 12:18 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense.
From: "Jarg"
Date: 6/29/2004 10:37 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


http://www.coastcomp.com

Read the caselaw


That's it? You make these claims and then you can't provide any supporting
citations? Your already limited credibility continues to drop.

Jarg


You obviously don't know what caselaw is. Caselaw is the ultimate credibility
in a supreme court decision. And since you have descended to personal
insults...PLONK !


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

On 29 Jun 2004 22:42:46 GMT, (ArtKramr) proclaimed:

And since you have descended to personal
insults...PLONK !

Oh my God!

Not the dreaded PLONK!

What a cruel fate.

Greasy Rider @ Invalid.com wrote in message
news
On 29 Jun 2004 22:42:46 GMT, (ArtKramr) proclaimed:

And since you have descended to personal
insults...PLONK !

Oh my God!

Not the dreaded PLONK!

What a cruel fate.

But an great tactic to avoid having your nose rubbed in a losing an
argument! And did you notice that the "personal insults" didn't
actually occur? I'm afraid the poor guy is deteriorating quickly.

Jarg