A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

poor lateral control on a slow tow?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old January 1st 11, 12:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bruce Hoult
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 961
Default poor lateral control on a slow tow?

On Jan 1, 8:07*am, John Cochrane
wrote:
The D2 also has a very low angle of incidence and thus a high nose
attitude on tow. Could this be part of the issue -- it's just darn
uncomfortable to fly with the nose pointed above the towplane? That
would also account for why 15 meter seems easier. We fly with flaps;
they are interconnected to the ailerons so we're not getting great
roll rates on tow. But it does give a nose down attitude so we can see
the towplane.


I had some really horrible feeling tows in a PW5. The thing felt
mushy, nose high, couldn't see the towplane, needed a lot of back
stick, afraid it was going to stall etc.

Then I realized that when you're going up at over 1000 fpm in still
air, keeping ANY part of the tug on the horizon (even wheels) is far
too high a position. I dropped down until I could start to feel the
wash and then came up a little. It felt much better but the tug seemed
WAY UP THERE.

Work it out ... at 65 knots and going up at 10 knots, the other end of
a 50m rope will be 7.7m above you if you're following the same path.
Even guessing 3m to get out of the wake, the tug should still be
nearly 5m above you.

And maybe it's 11 or 12 knots climb (I can't tell because the vario is
pegged), in which case that's another 1 or 1.5 m.

Since then I tow with the Pawnee horizontal stabilizer in the same
position against the forward parts of the tug no matter what glider
I'm in and just ignore the horizon. Even in the DG1000 two-up and
climbing at 700 fpm this still results in the tug's wheels being a
fraction above the horizon (and I've been criticized for this on
biannuals) but I'm still comfortably above the turbulence of the tug's
wake.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
another poor man's car engine conversion jan olieslagers[_2_] Home Built 19 February 22nd 09 03:49 PM
Poor readability Kees Mies Owning 2 August 14th 04 04:22 AM
Poor Guy Bob Chilcoat Owning 6 July 17th 04 06:45 PM
I'm grateful for poor people who are willing to murder & die Krztalizer Military Aviation 0 April 20th 04 11:11 PM
Concorde in FS2002: No lateral views A. Bomanns Simulators 3 July 19th 03 11:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.