Is there a problem with rah?

For the past several days I have only been averaging about 1 to 5
messages per day. That's way down from normal! I mean, there are
usually that many from Juan alone...anybody else seeing this problem?

Scott

"Scott" wrote in message
...
For the past several days I have only been averaging about 1 to 5 messages
per day. That's way down from normal! I mean, there are usually that
many from Juan alone...anybody else seeing this problem?

Scott

Yup, same here....

On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 10:17:21 +0000, Scott
wrote:

For the past several days I have only been averaging about 1 to 5
messages per day. That's way down from normal! I mean, there are
usually that many from Juan alone...anybody else seeing this problem?

Scott

there are two problems.
age
frustration

.....oh you mean the volume of traffic.
yes ditto here. though it's a lot healthier than sci.aeronautics.

I cant believe that everything is already known about aviation.
where would that leave the experts :-)
Stealth pilot

"Stealth Pilot" wrote in message ...
: On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 10:17:21 +0000, Scott
: wrote:
:
: For the past several days I have only been averaging about 1 to 5
: messages per day. That's way down from normal! I mean, there are
: usually that many from Juan alone...anybody else seeing this problem?
:
: Scott
:
: there are two problems.
: age
: frustration
:
: ....oh you mean the volume of traffic.
: yes ditto here. though it's a lot healthier than sci.aeronautics.
:
: I cant believe that everything is already known about aviation.
: where would that leave the experts :-)
: Stealth pilot

Building....and trying to stay warm...

Dan D.
Kalamazoo, MI

On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 13:26:43 GMT, "Blueskies"
wrote:


"Stealth Pilot" wrote in message ...
: On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 10:17:21 +0000, Scott
: wrote:
:
: For the past several days I have only been averaging about 1 to 5
: messages per day. That's way down from normal! I mean, there are
: usually that many from Juan alone...anybody else seeing this problem?
:
: Scott
:
: there are two problems.
: age
: frustration
:
: ....oh you mean the volume of traffic.
: yes ditto here. though it's a lot healthier than sci.aeronautics.

I think the "old timers" are just stopping to get their collective
breath. It's probably also weather related although this is the kind
of weather that puts me on the computer, rather than in the shop.

:
: I cant believe that everything is already known about aviation.
: where would that leave the experts :-)
: Stealth pilot

Building....and trying to stay warm...

It's just kinda chilly up here in Midland. The outside thermometer at
the shop says +5, but it's in the sun. :-)) At least it's nice and
toasty in the shop.

It must be psychological. Last night when the outside temp was showing
-6 I bumped the shop up to 72 from 70 and still felt cold. The
temperature in the shop is very consistent throughout the whole
building.

Dan D.
Kalamazoo, MI

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

Roger wrote:
snip

It must be psychological. Last night when the outside temp was showing
-6 I bumped the shop up to 72 from 70 and still felt cold. The
temperature in the shop is very consistent throughout the whole
building.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com


Dern sissy, when I was young I had to trudge through blizzards to
get to my hangar. It was up hill...... both ways...

Now let me tell you about having to kill a cave bear to get sinew to
sew fabric for my first airplane.......

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 16:13:42 -0600, Dan wrote:

Roger wrote:
snip

It must be psychological. Last night when the outside temp was showing
-6 I bumped the shop up to 72 from 70 and still felt cold. The
temperature in the shop is very consistent throughout the whole
building.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com


Dern sissy, when I was young I had to trudge through blizzards to
get to my hangar. It was up hill...... both ways...

You had it good. We was so poor I had to walk two miles through three
feet of snow, barefoot, uphill both ways to get to school.


Now let me tell you about having to kill a cave bear to get sinew to
sew fabric for my first airplane.......

Yah know we were all a lot tougher when we were young. Hows that old
saying go? "The older I get the better I was.":-))



Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

Stealth Pilot wrote:
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 10:17:21 +0000, Scott
wrote:


For the past several days I have only been averaging about 1 to 5
messages per day. That's way down from normal! I mean, there are
usually that many from Juan alone...anybody else seeing this problem?

Scott


there are two problems.
age
frustration

....oh you mean the volume of traffic.
yes ditto here. though it's a lot healthier than sci.aeronautics.

I cant believe that everything is already known about aviation.
where would that leave the experts :-)
Stealth pilot

Maybe all is not known about airplanes but I sure don't care if I ever
see the words juan or zoom again. I know that most of the people I know
that read this newsgroup are tired of hearing about them over and over
and over again. The same things are hashed over and over and over
about them. It gets really tedious reading about them. I know, change my
browser to ignore them or don't read it but it is still get aggravating
to see the same subjects all the time.

In article 2gGxh.1016$Yl3.973@trndny09, Jerry Springer says...

Maybe all is not known about airplanes but I sure don't care if I ever
see the words juan or zoom again. I know that most of the people I know
that read this newsgroup are tired of hearing about them over and over
and over again. The same things are hashed over and over and over
about them. It gets really tedious reading about them. I know, change my
browser to ignore them or don't read it but it is still get aggravating
to see the same subjects all the time.

In a way that's exactly what zoom wants,he wants everyone to forget what he has
done to people for the last 20 years. He backs off and waits until a new group
of newbies show up who are unaware of his past and then he can play hero all
over again.

I realize that for some, this fight gets old but it's a necessary fight. To
expose zoom is to protect newbies ,be they readers or advertizers from what zoom
will do time and time again. To readers he will portray himself as the next
coming of Chuck Yeager and a super hero who has done and flown all things
aeronautical. Newbies will take him at face value and think he's super pilot.
All wonderful and full of goodness.When in fact he's a phony.

Newbie advertizers will soon learn that if you start to advertize with him he
will run ads you didn't want and bill you for them .If you don't pay up he'll
sue you, something that Liberty Aerospace and ControlVision are now involved
in.I bet now they wish they knew about zoom's tactics before they started
advertizing with ANN .

So there is a reason for all this whether you agree or not is your decision but
I hold no grief with those who don't find it of interest. Usually it only
interests those who have been zoomed :-)

See ya

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

On 2/5/2007 8:50:55 AM, ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article 2gGxh.1016$Yl3.973@trndny09, Jerry Springer says...

Maybe all is not known about airplanes but I sure don't care if I ever
see the words juan or zoom again. I know that most of the people I know
that read this newsgroup are tired of hearing about them over and over
and over again. The same things are hashed over and over and over
about them. It gets really tedious reading about them. I know, change my
browser to ignore them or don't read it but it is still get aggravating
to see the same subjects all the time.

In a way that's exactly what zoom wants,he wants everyone to forget what he has
done to people for the last 20 years. He backs off and waits until a new group
of newbies show up who are unaware of his past and then he can play hero all
over again.

I realize that for some, this fight gets old but it's a necessary fight. To
expose zoom is to protect newbies ,be they readers or advertizers from what zoom
will do time and time again. To readers he will portray himself as the next
coming of Chuck Yeager and a super hero who has done and flown all things
aeronautical. Newbies will take him at face value and think he's super pilot.
All wonderful and full of goodness.When in fact he's a phony.

Newbie advertizers will soon learn that if you start to advertize with him he
will run ads you didn't want and bill you for them .If you don't pay up he'll
sue you, something that Liberty Aerospace and ControlVision are now involved
in.I bet now they wish they knew about zoom's tactics before they started
advertizing with ANN .

So there is a reason for all this whether you agree or not is your decision but
I hold no grief with those who don't find it of interest. Usually it only
interests those who have been zoomed :-)

See ya

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret


Sorry Chuck, but Jerry is right. 99% of that stuff has just become either
feeding Juan the troll, or Campbell stuff that is so far off topic it just
doesn't belong here. Everone here realizes where that pair is coming from,
give the rest of us a break.