Why GA is Dying

In article ,
Thomas Borchert wrote:

What do you expect? Thomas says we have laws where we have to "lose" our
guns. ;-)

Ops ;-)

My supply of o's is dwindling.

You were merely trying to balance the extra o's wasted when people
type loose instead of lose.

:-)

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

In article . net,
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:

I don't know about the rest of the group, but I'll go with what TSA has
to
say on this, as actually, I already know what they will say.

Asking TSA would be fine except that the TSA has demonstrated fundemental
flaws wrt understanding security.
[snip]


All this is fine, and probably very true, but the quality of airport
security isn't the issue being discussed here.

true. But, you, in effect, claimed that the TSA would be an appropriate
authority on what constitutes a security problem. I was pointing out the
problem with that position.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

Bob Noel wrote:

My supply of o's is dwindling.

You were merely trying to balance the extra o's wasted when people type loose instead of lose.

:-)

--
Bob Noel


Don't know how it is in the west, but the most frequent typo I've seen
among my countrymen is their use of 'few' when they mean 'a few',
turning the effing meaning on its head

Ramapriya

"Thomas Borchert" wrote\\

Ops ;-)

My supply of o's is dwindling.

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

S are mine! God excuse, by the way. Very creative! g
--
Jim in NC

"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...
Dudley,

These decisions ARE made by civilian leaders at the highest level of
ELECTED
GOVERNMENT. These leaders consult with ALL the necessary specialists in
the
field, both civilian and military when making these decisions, then the
decisions are made at the highest level, which is the elected civilian
government.


And you actually believe that your (or any) government works that way?
Wow,
that's beyond naive, IMHO. It's also not at all born out in everyday
experience. Not even remotely.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

I learned a long time ago on Usenet that people who think like you are
simply people who think like you, and nothing in the world anyone can say
will change this. I'm quite sure you would be totally unimpressed by the
fact that I deal with people directly involved in this area daily and am
quite familiar with how it works. As they say, "it ain't perfect", but its
nowhere near the unadulterated bull crap you are spewing on this newsgroup.
So if you don't mind, I'll let you have the answering post and not engage
you on this issue any further.
Best to you and so long.
Dudley Henriques

Dudley,

but its
nowhere near the unadulterated bull crap you are spewing on this newsgroup.


You show quite nicely that you have no facts to offer. You made my point.
Thanks.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...
Dudley,

These decisions ARE made by civilian leaders at the highest level of
ELECTED
GOVERNMENT. These leaders consult with ALL the necessary specialists in
the
field, both civilian and military when making these decisions, then the
decisions are made at the highest level, which is the elected civilian
government.


And you actually believe that your (or any) government works that way?
Wow,
that's beyond naive, IMHO. It's also not at all born out in everyday
experience. Not even remotely.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Thomas,

Rather than sit there and just yell "WRONG!!!", could you please explain to
the group how it really does work?

Thank You,

Jay Beckman
PP-ASEL
Chandler, AZ

It is what "membership"
means. I even qualified my original statement with "when on American
Soil", though I thought it would be obvious.

So we here do something wrong when granting the same rights to _everybody_
as long as they are legally in the country? We even protect the minorities.

Yes.

Were we to grant general voting rights to non-citizens, that would be
wrong. (However, some voting rights to non-citizen property owners,
relating solely to their property, would be reasonable).

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't the airlines had strictures against
photographing personell, procedures, etc... for quite some time (going back
well before 9/11?)

I don't know.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

I was trying to be kind about a possible typo.

For fun, read the Dred Scott case, the Supreme Court listed
what were considered "the rights of a citizen" and then said
blacks were not citizens because they could not do those
things.

The Supreme Court is very good at dodging an issue and
newspapers are good at taking things out of context and
spinning the facts.


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"Morgans" wrote in message
...
|
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
|
| Not enough guns in use by honest citizens.
|
| What do you expect? Thomas says we have laws where we
have to "lose" our
| guns. ;-)
|
| Thomas wrote:
| | Especially in a country with, well, lose gun laws.
|