A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

China to buy Eurofighters?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 3rd 03, 03:09 AM
phil hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default China to buy Eurofighters?

item: In October, a Chinese official report called for greater trade
with the EU, and for the EU's arms embrago against China to be
lifted.

item: German foreign minister Gerhard Schroder recently visited
China and said arms embrago should be lifted.

item: a spokesman for EADS (large European arms manufacturer, which
is one of the main partners in Eurofighter) recently called for the
embargo to end.

Any speculation as to what weapons China wants to buy? I think the
Eurofighter. Also on the shopping list might be ASRAAM, Meteor and
ASTER anti-aircraft missiles.

There's a more detailed discussion of this on my blog at:
http://www.cabalamat.org/weblog/art_97.html


--
"It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than
people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia
(Email: , but first subtract 275 and reverse
the last two letters).


  #2  
Old December 3rd 03, 05:59 AM
David Bromage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

phil hunt wrote:
Any speculation as to what weapons China wants to buy? I think the
Eurofighter.


Naturally the EU will agree in the hope of getting exports and secure
the future of the EF. Expect an initial Chinese order for 24 units,
followed by 300+ more built locally after they reverse engineer it.

Cheers
David

  #3  
Old December 3rd 03, 06:11 PM
phil hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 16:59:40 +1100, David Bromage wrote:
phil hunt wrote:
Any speculation as to what weapons China wants to buy? I think the
Eurofighter.


Naturally the EU will agree in the hope of getting exports and secure
the future of the EF. Expect an initial Chinese order for 24 units,
followed by 300+ more built locally after they reverse engineer it.


How easy would it be for them to reverse engineer things like the
radar and other avionics?

I suspect they might have trouble with the composites in the
structure, too.

--
"It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than
people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia
(Email: , but first subtract 275 and reverse
the last two letters).


  #6  
Old December 3rd 03, 04:27 PM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Adrian" wrote:

"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message


In my opinion selling them top of the line stuff is the height of
stupidity. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out what the
situation is going to be with China and the West in ten to fifteen
years.


Please explain. I see no conflict coming.


China has a lot of "issues" of the type that usually leads to war in one
way or another.

They're on the edge of running out of oil, and don't have a strong
enough economy in most other respects to let them buy enough for their
near-future needs. There are, however, areas in their vicinity (Siberia
and Malaysia for example) that have oil.

They have population imbalance problems, with far too many young men
(due to their terrible laws about family size).

The Chinese government, despite the perceptions of some, is fairly
nasty, and the Taiwan situation alone could make things go very bad,
very fast.

It wouldn't take much for a single event to push China over the edge. A
major earthquake at the Three Gorges Dam after it's filled up, for
example. In one stroke, they would lose much of their future electrical
generation *and* a lot of their crops and industrial production for a
year or two.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #7  
Old December 3rd 03, 06:15 PM
phil hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 16:27:31 GMT, Chad Irby wrote:
In article ,
"Adrian" wrote:

"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message


In my opinion selling them top of the line stuff is the height of
stupidity. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out what the
situation is going to be with China and the West in ten to fifteen
years.


Please explain. I see no conflict coming.


China has a lot of "issues" of the type that usually leads to war in one
way or another.

They're on the edge of running out of oil, and don't have a strong
enough economy in most other respects to let them buy enough for their
near-future needs. There are, however, areas in their vicinity (Siberia
and Malaysia for example) that have oil.


And Russia is a declining power; many have speculated on an eventual
Chinese takeover of Siberia.

The Chinese government, despite the perceptions of some, is fairly
nasty,


Indeed, they have a far-from-perfect human rights record.

and the Taiwan situation alone could make things go very bad,
very fast.


That's true.

It wouldn't take much for a single event to push China over the edge. A
major earthquake at the Three Gorges Dam after it's filled up, for
example. In one stroke, they would lose much of their future electrical
generation *and* a lot of their crops and industrial production for a
year or two.


I imagine the Chinese have thought about this.

--
"It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than
people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia
(Email: , but first subtract 275 and reverse
the last two letters).


  #9  
Old December 4th 03, 03:00 AM
phil hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 01:44:03 +0000 (UTC), Jim Yanik wrote:

Why do you think they are building more and more ICBMs,when Russia and the
US are downsizing their nuclear arsenals?


To make sure they can deter an American attack, even if the USA has
ballistic missile defences, probably.


--
"It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than
people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia
(Email: , but first subtract 275 and reverse
the last two letters).


  #10  
Old December 3rd 03, 12:11 PM
tscottme
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Scott Ferrin wrote in message
...



In my opinion selling them top of the line stuff is the height of
stupidity. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out what the
situation is going to be with China and the West in ten to fifteen
years.


What makes you think the Europeans don't want the next problem for the
US to be as bad as possible? They have no hope of exceeding the US
unless a full-scale war devastates the US. The fact that it helps
communists is a happy coincidence.

--

Scott
--------
Monitor the latest efforts of "peaceful Muslims" at
http://www.jihadwatch.org/


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CAAC in China had approved below 116kg aircraft sold in China without airworthiness cetificate Luo Zheng Home Built 0 June 27th 04 03:50 AM
Vietnam, any US planes lost in China ? Mike Military Aviation 7 November 4th 03 11:44 PM
Quit Bashing China! Bob McKellar Military Aviation 12 October 26th 03 06:06 PM
"China blamed in '01 air collision" Mike Yared Military Aviation 2 September 14th 03 06:08 PM
China has taken notice it would seem Mike Keown Military Aviation 8 August 29th 03 07:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.