If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
"Tarver Engineering" wrote If your F-105 is capable of doing something inside its flight envelope, it is normal operation. You have to remember that I have been harrassed here for years over claiming our F-106s were capable of mach 2.3 without damaging the airplane. An example of an abnormal operation is the cobra manouver, as the flight controls are altered from normal operation. As I said...a very 'interesting' definition of the word normal. Pete |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
"Tarver Engineering" wrote...
If your F-105 is capable of doing something inside its flight envelope, it is normal operation. An example of an abnormal operation is the cobra manouver, as the flight controls are altered from normal operation. How are the flight controls "altered from normal operation"? What part of the cobra maneuver is outside the airplane's flight envelope? How do you define "flight envelope" in context? |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
"John R Weiss" wrote in message news:rXNZb.375545$na.567325@attbi_s04... "Tarver Engineering" wrote... If your F-105 is capable of doing something inside its flight envelope, it is normal operation. An example of an abnormal operation is the cobra manouver, as the flight controls are altered from normal operation. How are the flight controls "altered from normal operation"? The operator must disable the control system augmentation in order to do a cobra manouver. What part of the cobra maneuver is outside the airplane's flight envelope? The airplane will not do a cobra manouver with the control's augmentation on. How do you define "flight envelope" in context? I define it the same way as you would an F-18 in "cable actuated system" mode. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
"Moose" wrote in message ... Tarver, you are brown-eyed. If you really were in the 194th you'll know exactly what that means. I was at the 144th FIW. Well John, if you were at the 144th FIW then 'YOU WERE" with the 194th FIS. Did you go on TDY to Castle to pull alert duty in 1983 while the 318th FIS was converting to F-15's? Nope, I was out in '80. I was in the CAMS squadron of the 144th FIW. We did have to drag quite a bit of Castle's F-106 duty in the 1970's, because their CAMS squadron crumbled. We were a top burner of JP-4 in USAF. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
... If your F-105 is capable of doing something inside its flight envelope, it is normal operation. An example of an abnormal operation is the cobra manouver, as the flight controls are altered from normal operation. How are the flight controls "altered from normal operation"? The operator must disable the control system augmentation in order to do a cobra manouver. What part of the cobra maneuver is outside the airplane's flight envelope? The airplane will not do a cobra manouver with the control's augmentation on. How do you define "flight envelope" in context? I define it the same way as you would an F-18 in "cable actuated system" mode. I don't define "flight envelope" in any context with reference to any F-18 system mode... So, what was the "normal operation" mode of the F-106 flight controls? By your definition/description of "flight envelope," any maneuver or regime an airplane can enter with any control input, using "normal" control authority is a "normal operation." Using that definition, any maneuvers prohibited by the Operator's Handbook or other limitations would be considered "normal" if they were achievable using the "normal" flight control mode. So, do you consider as "normal operation" any departure from controlled flight, spin (even if entered inadvertently, in an aircraft in which intentional spins are prohibited), or extended inverted flight (even if it causes oil or fuel starvation to the engine)? Many airplanes can enter these flight regimes with flight controls in "normal" configurations, but few pilots would consider them "normal operations" in most airplanes. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
"John R Weiss" wrote in message news:umUZb.378753$na.569282@attbi_s04... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... If your F-105 is capable of doing something inside its flight envelope, it is normal operation. An example of an abnormal operation is the cobra manouver, as the flight controls are altered from normal operation. How are the flight controls "altered from normal operation"? The operator must disable the control system augmentation in order to do a cobra manouver. What part of the cobra maneuver is outside the airplane's flight envelope? The airplane will not do a cobra manouver with the control's augmentation on. How do you define "flight envelope" in context? I define it the same way as you would an F-18 in "cable actuated system" mode. I don't define "flight envelope" in any context with reference to any F-18 system mode... You should, the F-18 unaugmented is a real tail dragger and I don't mean a wheel. So, what was the "normal operation" mode of the F-106 flight controls? I never worked on the F-106's flight controls. By your definition/description of "flight envelope," any maneuver or regime an airplane can enter with any control input, using "normal" control authority is a "normal operation." Using that definition, any maneuvers prohibited by the Operator's Handbook or other limitations would be considered "normal" Nope, the operator's handbook describes the flight envelope. Consider for a moment that you are a French pilot making a low slow pass over a runway in an early A-320. The airplane has no such normal operation for a low slow pass over a runway, but only to land, or go around. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
"B2431" wrote...
You were expecting an honest, straight and/or knowledgable responce from tarver? No... But I'm an incurable optimist, hoping for one eventually! |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
"Tarver Engineering" wrote...
If your F-105 is capable of doing something inside its flight envelope, it is normal operation. An example of an abnormal operation is the cobra manouver, as the flight controls are altered from normal operation. The operator must disable the control system augmentation in order to do a cobra manouver. The airplane will not do a cobra manouver with the control's augmentation on. How do you define "flight envelope" in context? I define it the same way as you would an F-18 in "cable actuated system" mode. So, what was the "normal operation" mode of the F-106 flight controls? By your definition/description of "flight envelope," any maneuver or regime an airplane can enter with any control input, using "normal" control authority is a "normal operation." Using that definition, any maneuvers prohibited by the Operator's Handbook or other limitations would be considered "normal" Nope, the operator's handbook describes the flight envelope. But you just told us the flight envelope is described by the airplane's ability to perform a maneuver or enter a flight regime using a "normal" control configuration! Which is it -- defined by a control mode or defined by an operator's handbook (I will assume that includes a "Dash-1" for USAF airplanes and NATOPS for USN airplanes and FAA approved Flight Handbook [FHB} for Transport category aircraft)? If the operator's handbook, how is the "flight envelope" described? In the General Limitations and Specifications" section or "Maximum Airspeed Limits Chart" in the Limitations section of an FHB? Something else? Something more? |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
"John R Weiss" wrote in message news:WPe_b.42094$4o.58808@attbi_s52... "Tarver Engineering" wrote... If your F-105 is capable of doing something inside its flight envelope, it is normal operation. An example of an abnormal operation is the cobra manouver, as the flight controls are altered from normal operation. The operator must disable the control system augmentation in order to do a cobra manouver. The airplane will not do a cobra manouver with the control's augmentation on. How do you define "flight envelope" in context? I define it the same way as you would an F-18 in "cable actuated system" mode. So, what was the "normal operation" mode of the F-106 flight controls? By your definition/description of "flight envelope," any maneuver or regime an airplane can enter with any control input, using "normal" control authority is a "normal operation." Using that definition, any maneuvers prohibited by the Operator's Handbook or other limitations would be considered "normal" Nope, the operator's handbook describes the flight envelope. But you just told us the flight envelope is described by the airplane's ability to perform a maneuver or enter a flight regime using a "normal" control configuration! Sure. The POH is part of the Type Certificate. Are you claiming the Dash 1 for an F-106 disagrees with a mach 2.3 F-106? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
Edwards air show B-1 speed record attempt | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 146 | November 3rd 03 05:18 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |