If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Packing your own:
There is a lot more to being a rigger than just packing a 'chute. I vote for trusting someone who does this more that four times a year. $200 a year is nothing when you are in free-fall, pulling the handle, and remembering this is your ONLY parachute, your only chance to live. Been there, very intense moments until the reserve goes 'whump'. Send that old 'chute to the manufacturer for the repack. I would think nothing would assure the buyer more than a current packing data card from the manufacturer. They will be sure to check it every which way and expecially for wear and fabric strength. They do get wear just being in the pack. Fabric does lose strength with time. I have seen them open (not mine!) and well...... what good is it open if it has these big holes in it? Does anyone leave their rig in the hot sun, in a car in the hot sun, in the cockpit...... Heat can very well have an adverse affect on the condition of the parachute in the pack. How well do you know your rigger's competancy? I recently took mine to a different rigger who took the time to test the pilotchute spring. Guess what? It was way below standard. What good is it to have a perfectly good parachute if it won't get off your back cleanly? Do you pop your rig before you take it for repack? Ask your rigger next time how the pilotchute test went? HUH? Get a new rigger. Last but not least: When was the last time any of us did a pin check on our parachute rig? Do you know what a pin check is? We all should and should do it EVERY TIME before we put it on. One small piece of gravel lodged inside your housing can cause a total malfunction. Yes, a pin check includes ensuring the ripcord cable moves freely within the housing. Not likely that problem and the need to use the parachute could happen at the same time is it? Want to bet your life on it? Old Skydiver, New glider pilot. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Mostly correct......
Security Chutes (GQ) are still being manufactured and sold in the UK, but no longer in the USA...I am not certain, maybe our UK friends can better answer, but I was told new parachute by GQ have a strict 12 year(?) life limit now, afterwards they can no longer be used....I know there are similar limits in some European countries. There was a big issue with some earlier Security parachutes having an acid reaction to the material causing the canopy materials to deteriorate. This was however not only a Security problem but also affected most other manufacturers as well. All manufacturers are still required to test canopy material for acid (PH) and I know for fact that the major manufacturers have even in very recent times had to reject material for this same problem. In the USA there is not a specific requirement in the FARs to "condemn" parachute at any specified time, but the manufacturers have typically set life limits on their own products at 20 years, and will not "normally" I&R a parachute after passing the 20th birthday. Most reputable riggers also will recommend retiring parachutes after 20 years if not reject or refuse to I&R and typically riggers are not going to be the retail dealers for new parachutes so doing so is not a sales gimmick to sell new parachutes. I have had some (very rare) chutes that were at, near or even over 20 years that were sill so "unused" that I just couldn't justify destroying them, but could also not offer them for sale knowing the buyer may have problems getting the I&R done later when necessary, these chutes I've kept on hand for locals to borrow or buy (for not much more than the cost of the I&R) since I could keep an eye on them. I would not recommend selling any used parachute that was not in very good condition, even if still much younger than the 20 year birthday and rather than put a few hundred $ in my pocket would highly recommend others do the same. A few $ is not worth the potential risk you may be placing on the unknowing buyer. Just MHO tim JC wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:19:55 -0800, Eric Greenwell wrote: Duster wrote: I'm planning on purchasing a new or used parachute to replace mine that does not fit the contours of my ship. My question pertains to the accepted longevity of emergency parachutes which I've often heard is about 20 years. Because mine is 27 years old, I was just about to toss my Security 250 in the dump. However, I recently reread an article by John Good on parachutes published in Soaring (March 2003) which quotes Ted Strong (of Strong Parachutes) and a colleague as saying, "...there is no need to impose a limited service life on an emergency parachute." What's the consensus by others in the sport? Should I try to sell it or trash it? I suggest you contact Security for their recommendation, since that is what a likely buyer will do and go by. At one time, there were some AD's on Security chutes, also a factor in your choice. You would have a hard time contacting Security. They no longer do business in the United States. I went through this same situation this past summer when I sold a Security 350. What my master rigger said, was long as it passes inspection it is OK to use. He said the 20 year service life was promoted by the manufactures, mostly to sell new chutes. If it has been well maintained there is no reason it is not still good. I know of one rigger who will still pack the old silk army chutes. Some of the Security chutes had bad "vent" material. The material was treated with a fire retardant for use as a mosquito netting, then used in parachutes by mistake. When your chute is repacked the fabric is to be tested with an "acid" that will change color if the netting has been treated with the fire retardant and it has leeched into the adjacent fabric. At this point most all the chutes that have the bad material have been removed from service. Most likely, I am told, if it passes the acid test it will always pass the acid test. But not always. I know of a chute purchased by a friend that passed the acid test in the summer, but the following spring it failed. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
O'K...good topic. There is more to a parachute then most of pilots do
realize. They come in different flavors and colors but....I am a rigger. I will not pack for anyone parachute older than 15 years. Some riggers will. Why I want? Parachutes and container/harness systems are designed under several different categories, like TSO c23d....let me explain: The TSO certification was established in 1976, with the TSO-c23a rating, as an international standard for parachutes. No parachute can be sold as a reserve or rescue parachute without a TSO rating. In the years since the TSO-C23a rating was established, the level of standards to meet the rating has become significantly higher. In 1992 the TSO-C23d rating was introduced and today less than 15% of the manufacturers who hold a TSO rating have the TSO-c23d rating. As of July of 2002, all parachute manufacturers who hold a TSO rating lower than the TSO-C23d are unable to make improvements to their parachutes or to reach the higher standard, and are therefore selling parachutes based on technology that is over 10 years old or even older in some cases. O'K...I will make it simple...imagine that you are flying high, like for example on the wave. You flew into something that mangled your bird and you need to get out. You think to yourself " aaaa, not a big deal, I've got my parachute". You got out of the cockpit and started rushing down to earth. Do you have any idea about the acceleration? Do you know how fast you are going down? Do you know how to control your body in freefall so don't spin like a piece of meat? Well, most of you don't. So, I would suggest go to any DZ and make a tandem jump in order to open your eyes. Now, when all that fast stuff is happening, you have no idea what is going on. Now you pull the rip cord. And you are looking up and you see a canopy that is damaged from the opening shock. Well. you are still heading down the earth and you have a few moment left to ponder about you being cheep, very cheep, because you should buy yourself a new emergency parachute. But after a few, very long seconds it want matter anymore...... Parachutes are more then just cushions to seat on and make yourself comfortable in the cockpit. Do yourself a big favor and buy new rig. If your canopy is older then 15 years don't even think about trying to substitute. If any one needs more help on this topic contact me directly. If your container is good spend $500.00 and change just the canopy. If the rig is old...well, buy it brand new. Oh, by the way...there is more to rigging then just packing. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Repack cycle is not every 4 months. It is every 120 days. Beware of
some FAA inspectors who know about rigging. They will nail you. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Just a few thoughts for you:
I've noticed some people telling you that 20 years (or even 15) is too much, and quoting a bunch of stuff and scary examples. Speaking as someone who has 600+ parachute jumps, including 8 emergency activations (three of them on emergency parachutes greater than 20 years old and two more on emergency parachutes more than 15 years old) and multiple intentional single-parachute jumps (several on a parachute greater than 20 years old) and put put well over 100 first jump students (most of them on reserves over 20 years old) I can only say that this is the worst load of FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) that I've seen on this newsgroup in a while. There is no life limit on parachutes on the US. Period, end of story, not a gray area, not debatable. As long as the parachute passes inspection, it is legal and safe to use. Life limits are used in aviation when there is no effective non-destructive way to inspect a component to assure it still meets standards. There are NO parts of a parachute that can't be effectively inspected when it is being repacked, thus there is no reason whatsoever for life limits. It's really that simple. People who understand and routinely use and pack parachutes (skydivers) also understand this, and have no qualms about the age of a reserve (or main) parachute that has been inspected. They also understand that the number of times the parachute is packed and/or jumped does cause wear. This wear is visible and inspectable. The factory has an interest in limiting liability and making older product go away. A dealer has an interest in selling new product. Therefore, impartial opinions are not to be had from either. The acid mesh problem is an ancient bugaboo. Once upon a time it was a real issue. An AD was issued (AD's are issued on parachutes just like they are on aircraft), some parachutes were tested, and the problem went away. Manufacturers now have improved QC procedures so it is no longer an issue. Round personnel parachutes are old technology. There has been no substantial improvement in that technology in decades. What's manufactured today is barely distinguishable from what was manufactured in 1980, changes to TSO notwithstanding. Here is my advice to you: Stay away from riggers who don't routinely jump - they are bad news. Ideally, find a rigger who BASE jumps - they understand what's really important when making a single canopy jump. Go to your local drop zone. Not some fancy commercial operation with turbine aircraft and tandems, but something more local and down home. Talk to the jumpers who jump old gear, and find out who their rigger is. Have him inspect and repack the parachute. If he considers it sound, sell it - and give his name to the buyer. Michael |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Just a few thoughts for you:
I've noticed some people telling you that 20 years (or even 15) is too much, and quoting a bunch of stuff and scary examples. Speaking as someone who has 600+ parachute jumps, including 8 emergency activations (three of them on emergency parachutes greater than 20 years old and two more on emergency parachutes more than 15 years old) and multiple intentional single-parachute jumps (several on a parachute greater than 20 years old) and put put well over 100 first jump students (most of them on reserves over 20 years old) I can only say that this is the worst load of FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) that I've seen on this newsgroup in a while. There is no life limit on parachutes on the US. Period, end of story, not a gray area, not debatable. As long as the parachute passes inspection, it is legal and safe to use. Life limits are used in aviation when there is no effective non-destructive way to inspect a component to assure it still meets standards. There are NO parts of a parachute that can't be effectively inspected when it is being repacked, thus there is no reason whatsoever for life limits. It's really that simple. People who understand and routinely use and pack parachutes (skydivers) also understand this, and have no qualms about the age of a reserve (or main) parachute that has been inspected. They also understand that the number of times the parachute is packed and/or jumped does cause wear. This wear is visible and inspectable. The factory has an interest in limiting liability and making older product go away. A dealer has an interest in selling new product. Therefore, impartial opinions are not to be had from either. The acid mesh problem is an ancient bugaboo. Once upon a time it was a real issue. An AD was issued (AD's are issued on parachutes just like they are on aircraft), some parachutes were tested, and the problem went away. Manufacturers now have improved QC procedures so it is no longer an issue. Round personnel parachutes are old technology. There has been no substantial improvement in that technology in decades. What's manufactured today is barely distinguishable from what was manufactured in 1980, changes to TSO notwithstanding. Here is my advice to you: Stay away from riggers who don't routinely jump - they are bad news. Ideally, find a rigger who BASE jumps - they understand what's really important when making a single canopy jump. Go to your local drop zone. Not some fancy commercial operation with turbine aircraft and tandems, but something more local and down home. Talk to the jumpers who jump old gear, and find out who their rigger is. Have him inspect and repack the parachute. If he considers it sound, sell it - and give his name to the buyer. Michael |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Good post, Michael
I was thinking about posting something along the same lines. I get my chute repacked at the local jump school and the rigger tells me my 25 year old Strong is in fine shape and has fewer problems than some of the new stuff. A parachute is just a tool, treat it right, keep it dry and away from oil, get it inspected, hung and repacked as required and don't worry about it. PS, I wear 2 little silk worms on my lapel. At 21:30 22 December 2004, Michael wrote: Just a few thoughts for you: I've noticed some people telling you that 20 years (or even 15) is too much, and quoting a bunch of stuff and scary examples. Speaking as someone who has 600+ parachute jumps, including 8 emergency activations (three of them on emergency parachutes greater than 20 years old and two more on emergency parachutes more than 15 years old) and multiple intentional single-parachute jumps (several on a parachute greater than 20 years old) and put put well over 100 first jump students (most of them on reserves over 20 years old) I can only say that this is the worst load of FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) that I've seen on this newsgroup in a while. There is no life limit on parachutes on the US. Period, end of story, not a gray area, not debatable. As long as the parachute passes inspection, it is legal and safe to use. Life limits are used in aviation when there is no effective non-destructive way to inspect a component to assure it still meets standards. There are NO parts of a parachute that can't be effectively inspected when it is being repacked, thus there is no reason whatsoever for life limits. It's really that simple. People who understand and routinely use and pack parachutes (skydivers) also understand this, and have no qualms about the age of a reserve (or main) parachute that has been inspected. They also understand that the number of times the parachute is packed and/or jumped does cause wear. This wear is visible and inspectable. The factory has an interest in limiting liability and making older product go away. A dealer has an interest in selling new product. Therefore, impartial opinions are not to be had from either. The acid mesh problem is an ancient bugaboo. Once upon a time it was a real issue. An AD was issued (AD's are issued on parachutes just like they are on aircraft), some parachutes were tested, and the problem went away. Manufacturers now have improved QC procedures so it is no longer an issue. Round personnel parachutes are old technology. There has been no substantial improvement in that technology in decades. What's manufactured today is barely distinguishable from what was manufactured in 1980, changes to TSO notwithstanding. Here is my advice to you: Stay away from riggers who don't routinely jump - they are bad news. Ideally, find a rigger who BASE jumps - they understand what's really important when making a single canopy jump. Go to your local drop zone. Not some fancy commercial operation with turbine aircraft and tandems, but something more local and down home. Talk to the jumpers who jump old gear, and find out who their rigger is. Have him inspect and repack the parachute. If he considers it sound, sell it - and give his name to the buyer. Michael |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Just to clarify...besides being a rigger I am also a skydiver. And an
instructor. And S&TA. And I have a bit more jumps then your 600. I have a bit more repacks then you. I also don't jump on a big commercial DZ. For your info, National has a life span on their canopies of 15 years. And the same apply to Free Flight Enterprises canopies which are found in Softies. I am not familiar with Strong emergency rigs, they might certify them for more then 15 years. PD has a life span of 40 repack cycles, after which you must send it to the factory for inspection. And if the porosity of the fabric doesn't pass, well, they will call you to let you know. Bottom line. In June of 2002 a canopy on my DZ during landing, a PD 176 Lightning disintegrated in the air after being kicked by another skydiver. The guy who caused the accident was jumping on newer canopy and he walked away....the Lightning came back from PD in Florida from being relined and repaired (small patches around the bridle retraction system) and virtually exploded at about 150 feet...the guy survived. Similar accident took place in 1999 in Star, near Boise, ID. Main canopy exploded on opening...it was 7 years old Turbo ZX. The skydiver survived as well. Are those unique incidents? No. And before you give any body really bad advise, think about it. You are not doing anybody a favor. And I am also not a dealer, I am not manufacturer. I am just a guy who started skydiving and flying in 1980 and I have witnessed a lots of things that could have been avoided. And also don't accuse any riggers of trying to help you ....if you eat dirt the FAA looks at the repack card and seal and they will come after the rigger. And probably your family will come after the rigger, the factory which built your rig and they will sue them....now you don't care about affecting more then your own life? Think about it very hard. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Good point. Of course when we get ours repacked, the rigger puts a
tag "expires on 29 JUL 04" or whatever. So we just look at that instead of doing all that math. Leap years and all, ya know...scrambles the noodle... In article .com, wrote: Repack cycle is not every 4 months. It is every 120 days. Beware of some FAA inspectors who know about rigging. They will nail you. -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Emergency Parachute questions | Jay Moreland | Aerobatics | 14 | December 3rd 04 05:46 PM |
Parachute safety | Duane Eisenbeiss | Soaring | 0 | May 15th 04 08:13 PM |
Cirrus BRS deployments - Alan Klapmeier's comments on NPR | Dan Luke | Piloting | 67 | April 25th 04 04:31 PM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |