|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
April 20th 21, 06:28 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
FLARM Fusion Range
Hi guys,
I just installed a FLARM Fusion and am getting some very poor results. The antennas are installed symmetrically on either side of the canopy rail (see photographs) in an ASW27b. They clip into a plastic adaptor printed from ABS, and each antenna has a clear 180 degree view out the side of the canopy. This seems to me like a pretty ideal setup to avoid the carbon in the cockpit, etc. Can anyone help me understand why the range is not better, and in particular, why the range is better on one antenna vs the other? that makes no sense to me. Thanks, Matt Herron PastedGraphic-4.tiff PastedGraphic-1.tiff PastedGraphic-2.tiff 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flarm Range Analysis | Dan Marotta | Soaring | 22 | June 16th 17 10:54 AM |
| Information for all users of Flarm, OEM FLARM supplier and Flarm PowerFlarm | [email protected] | Soaring | 28 | March 12th 16 04:31 AM |
| FLARM Range | [email protected] | Soaring | 11 | June 16th 15 11:44 PM |
| Flarm range | Ramy[_2_] | Soaring | 7 | May 7th 15 11:02 PM |
| long range aircraft flying short-range routes? | tupolev204 | Piloting | 10 | April 22nd 11 07:44 PM |
Threaded Mode