A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

metric system newsgroup call for votes #1



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old November 7th 03, 10:21 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Goran Larsson" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Marcus Andersson wrote:

All Gripens can use either metres or feet for altitude and km/h or
knots for airspeed. Just push a button to select.


That feature is not available in all software editions, and the
backup instruments in 39A and 39B can only show proper SI units.


Oxymoron.


  #32  
Old November 7th 03, 10:22 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dave Kearton" wrote in
message ...


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Dave Kearton" wrote in
message ...

snip of gord bragging about his dick
Still impressive - unless you're talking about pitot tubes ......


Do you even know what a pitot tube is, little freak?

I don't think we need to hear what you think of Gord's crank.




A bit sensitive John ....


I intended it to be funny, you should relax.


  #33  
Old November 7th 03, 10:42 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Emmanuel Gustin" wrote in message
...
"Mary Shafer" wrote in message
...

Yes, but are your *absolutely* sure that all "Western aircraft use
English units"?


For altitude and airspeed, they do. I'm absolutely sure. ICAO says
so.


As far as I know, that is not true. The preferred ICAO units
are SI, but it allows countries to choose a set of non-SI units.
The FAA requires 'English' units for speed and altitude.


Dude, nautical miles are a measurment system based on the Earth; as such
English units are units consistent with lattitude and longitude.

As the "Metric Conversion Act of 1975" requires US
government agencies to use SI units (with a huge loophole
stating that conversion does not have to been done where
it is impractical) and for all government procurement, this
position of the FAA is something of an anomaly, but of
course the transition would be very difficult...


Carter's little bull**** got flushed by House Government Oversite and Reform
in 1996. (Klinger Chair)


  #34  
Old November 8th 03, 01:04 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dave Kearton" wrote:

...if it were anybody else, I'd put it down to pitot envy.


"Pitot envy". Good one Dave.. (just cracks me up...)




--

-Gord.
  #36  
Old November 8th 03, 01:30 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Emmanuel Gustin" wrote:

"Mary Shafer" wrote in message
.. .

Yes, but are your *absolutely* sure that all "Western aircraft use
English units"?


For altitude and airspeed, they do. I'm absolutely sure. ICAO says
so.


As far as I know, that is not true. The preferred ICAO units
are SI, but it allows countries to choose a set of non-SI units.
The FAA requires 'English' units for speed and altitude.


Keep in mind that some time ago Mary also asserted in no
uncertain terms that both the FAA and the NSTB did not use Pilot
Error as a reason for any aircraft accident.

Incidentally, Tony Kern has a new book out. Here's my order
confirmation:

Shipping estimate for these items: November 3, 2003 1
"Controlling Pilot Error: Culture, Environment, and CRM (Crew
Resource Management)"
Tony Kern;Paperback; $11.00

He's a terrific writer, his article (now a book apparently) known
as "Darker Shades of Blue" was a great read about the B-52 prang
at Fairchild AFB a few years ago.



--

-Gord.
  #37  
Old November 8th 03, 01:32 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robert Briggs wrote:

Tarver Engineering wrote:
John Mullen wrote:
Tarver Engineering wrote:
Paul Hirose wrote:


There's a vote going now on creating a newsgroup about the
metric system:

The metric system is off topic for aviation newsgroups.

Far from it.


Russians use metric units and Western aircraft use English units,
the two safety records speak for themselves.


That's an interesting notion in view of the origin of the term
"Gimli Glider" ...


....and the 'Mars lander' was it?...
--

-Gord.
  #38  
Old November 8th 03, 06:13 AM
Robb McLeod
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 08:58:24 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:

And since nautical miles are a measurement system based on the earth, they
work out real well for navigation.


That might have been true at one time but the Imperial system is now
entirely defined in terms of Metric units.

E.g. One inch is exactly 2.54 mm, etc.

This was changed over in 1958, previously the inch being 25.40000508
mm.

Similarly the nautical mile is now defined as exactly 1852 m.
Previous to the switchover it was 1853.184 m.

:-P

--
Robb McLeod )
A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops.
On my desk I have a work station...
  #39  
Old November 8th 03, 06:52 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Robb McLeod" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 08:58:24 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:

And since nautical miles are a measurement system based on the earth,

they
work out real well for navigation.


That might have been true at one time but the Imperial system is now
entirely defined in terms of Metric units.


I fear you miss the entire point, nautical miles agree with latitude and
longitude.

snip of irrelevence


  #40  
Old November 8th 03, 07:55 PM
Robb McLeod
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 22:52:32 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Robb McLeod" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 08:58:24 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:

And since nautical miles are a measurement system based on the earth,

they
work out real well for navigation.


That might have been true at one time but the Imperial system is now
entirely defined in terms of Metric units.


I fear you miss the entire point, nautical miles agree with latitude and
longitude.

snip of irrelevence


But the Earth isn't perfect sphere, nor is an arc minute the same in
a plane as a submarine. The natical mile was standardized to metric
because it was inconsistant depending on where you stood on the globe.

--
Robb McLeod )
A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops.
On my desk I have a work station...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Edwards air show B-1 speed record attempt Paul Hirose Military Aviation 146 November 3rd 03 05:18 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.