If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
This should settle it!
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Mark T. Dame writes: Note, however, we are talking about real simulators and flight training devices (or at worst PCATDs, which have even more restrictions), not games like MS Flight Simulator. You do yourself a disservice by underestimating "games" like MSFS. It's a bad attitude for a pilot to have--one of the danger signs. How would you know dip****, you're not even a pilot. Actually a simmer with your underestimations of actually flight is a 100 times more dangerous. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
This should settle it!
Mxsmanic,
It's a bad attitude for a pilot to have--one of the danger signs. You know, you should really worry about your attitudes first. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
This should settle it!
Mxsmanic wrote:
Mark T. Dame writes: Note, however, we are talking about real simulators and flight training devices (or at worst PCATDs, which have even more restrictions), not games like MS Flight Simulator. You do yourself a disservice by underestimating "games" like MSFS. It's a bad attitude for a pilot to have--one of the danger signs. Interesting. I'm a dangerous pilot because I don't think Microsoft Flight Simulator has much value in real world pilot training. By that logic, I should be able to race a Formula One race car because I've played Grand Turismo... Or maybe I can be an astronaut because I used to be really good at Lunar Lander. They're both based on real physics and real vehicle performance just like MSFS, so they must be good training devices... That fact is that your insistence that MSFS is a more valuable training aid than it really is makes me glad that you aren't flying a real plane. (Dammit, I'm feeding the trolls again. Somebody smack me.) -m -- ## Mark T. Dame ## CP-ASEL, AGI ## insert tail number here ## KHAO, KISZ "Individually twisted." -- My pretzel box |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
This should settle it!
Maxwell writes:
How would you know dip****, you're not even a pilot. Because I recognize the attitude. Actually a simmer with your underestimations of actually flight is a 100 times more dangerous. I have a good attitude, and I'm cautious. I'd be quite a safe pilot in a real aircraft, perhaps so safe that I'd irritate instructors. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
This should settle it!
Thomas Borchert writes:
You know, you should really worry about your attitudes first. My attitude won't get me killed. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
This should settle it!
Mark T. Dame writes:
Interesting. I'm a dangerous pilot because I don't think Microsoft Flight Simulator has much value in real world pilot training. No, you show some danger signs because you are quick to vigorously dismiss what you don't understand or don't like. By that logic, I should be able to race a Formula One race car because I've played Grand Turismo... Have you tried it? They're both based on real physics and real vehicle performance just like MSFS, so they must be good training devices... They are far better than many early simulators costing much more, with much less criticism directed at them. That fact is that your insistence that MSFS is a more valuable training aid than it really is makes me glad that you aren't flying a real plane. As pathologically cautious as I sometimes tend to be, I don't think I'd be any danger to anyone flying a real plane. The only risk would be that I might incur the wrath of all the macho men flying around me, although encounters with terrain and each other might eventually filter them out. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
This should settle it!
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Maxwell writes: How would you know dip****, you're not even a pilot. Because I recognize the attitude. Actually a simmer with your underestimations of actually flight is a 100 times more dangerous. I have a good attitude, and I'm cautious. I'd be quite a safe pilot in a real aircraft, perhaps so safe that I'd irritate instructors. No you don't, you are so ignorant you can even see your own attitude problem. And you would never be able to keep an instructor with all you WAG assumptions. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
This should settle it!
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Mark T. Dame writes: snip - WAG assumptions and illusions of grandure -- You're a legend in your own mind Mr. Mitty. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
This should settle it!
On Apr 15, 8:01 am, "Oz Lander" wrote:
http://overtheairwaves.com/ I refer to the first article on this page. -- Oz Lander. I'm not always right, But I'm never wrong. Don't think it settlled it. -- Gene Seibel Gene & Sue's Aeroplanes - http://pad39a.com/gene/planes.html Because we fly, we envy no one. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
This should settle it!
Mark T. Dame wrote:
(Dammit, I'm feeding the trolls again. Somebody smack me.) *Smack!* Now, grasshoppah, you learn value of "K" key. Press when topic go off deep end, and all problems solved. Thunderbird good for that. TheSmokingGnu |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Settle a bet: Mach speeds | tscottme | Military Aviation | 27 | June 8th 04 10:16 AM |