If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Big John Bites Dicks (Security Clearance)
I haven't gone to the archives and looked at prior activities of BWB but if they match what has shown up on r.a.h. lately and what others have said about him, then I can get his clearances pulled if they are still active. I'm not making threats, just pointing out what can be done in the system. In this PC world today, it is easy to cut someone out of the pattern. Big John "I can get his clearances pulled if they are still active." "I"m not making threats, just pointing out what can be done in the system." ----Great sentence for a typical lame brain Nazi. Don't you love it? Some annonymous prick struts in with his gut retracted, and his chest standing out and threatens to take away a man's livelihood. This is the kind of pond scum that I hated in the government. While the President of the United States, gets blow jobs in the White House, some little prick like this coward is turned lose on me and my staff. This is the kind of cocksucker who would send you to to concentration camp if you had an uncle that was a Jew. The world is full of them. Johnny Ammeter mentions some stuff above about why I hated having a clearance. This prick here is why I hated having a clearance. This jack-off is like taking a minority who has been picked on his whole life and giving him a badge. This is exactly the kind of prick that the security forces of ALL governments are loaded with. This jack-off probably can't fly, most likely has no formal education and probably retired as an NCO at an E-4 or E-5. You notice he doesn't say he was a pilot in the Air Force. But he puts that tag on himself here because this is an airplane group and he assumes it will lend a bit of credibility to his dishonorable ass. Give a prick like this an inch and he'll take a mile. He'll **** with a full colonel just because he can, and he's jealous enough to be motivated to do it. This prick is the type of little root-worm who walks around a guys neighborhood asking all of the neighbors how much he drinks and what his character is all about. Then he writes a report that ****s the subject out of his clearance...and submits that report on a Friday just before he himself goes out to a gay bar and sucks someone's dick or ****s his daughter. I'd like to meet you in real life, you ****ing coward. God how I'd love to meet a muther ****er like you. You better hope I never find out who you are. Anybody know who this asshole is? Email me and tell me. I may make him my hobby and hunt him down like an animal. "I can get his clearances pulled if they are still active." You go do it, you jack off. You go and do it. I'll see you in Hell. BWB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Here's the Security Abuse Item of the Day
http://www.usatoday.com/money/compan...-janitor_x.htm A janitor had his clearance revoked because he declared bankruptcy 19 years ago. Why don't we just remove blue and green from the terror alert levels? We'll never go there as long as the people who decide the level are the same ones who would lose their power if the level were lowered. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 22:28:18 -0400, Paul Dowgewicz
wrote: Here's the Security Abuse Item of the Day http://www.usatoday.com/money/compan...-janitor_x.htm A janitor had his clearance revoked because he declared bankruptcy 19 years ago. I've heard a lot of anecdotal stories along this one. One guy got turned down, and raised a fuss. Turned out he'd had the nickname "Klepto" in grade school. For stealing apples from a tree on the way home...the name was short for "Apple Kleptomaniac" My favorite story is about a guy who was filling out his applications, and came across the question: "Have you or any member of your family ever taken any action to subvert or overthrow the government of the United States?" He thought for a moment, then answered, "yes." Incredibly, the security investigators missed it. The last bureaucratic who had to sign off on the papers noticed it, and raised a huge stink. The applicant was brought into the office, and they demanded to know why he answered "yes" to that question. "Because my great-grandpappy fought for the South in the War Between the States." The story goes that they subsequently inserted the word, "immediate" before "family." I got interviewed for a friend's clearance a couple of months back. They asked me if I knew whether he had contacts in the news media. "Yes," I said, "me!" Ron wanttaja |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Big John wrote
This doesn't make much sense with the filter deleted parts but don't have to listen/read any filth and trashing by a nut case. Big John Yeah Big John, Sorry to be the one to tell you this, but IMHO you're going to miss a lot that way. Just my observation from lurking here since 95' Just because you've got a civilian scientist behaving badly is no reason to seal-off the base and issue the "go-code." (Dr. StrangeWater for example) You can still protect your "bodily fluids" without going critical. Ever listen to gangster wrap?... the crap has taken over the world. Every other word is profane. They blast that crap everywhere but Singapore and Mainland China. It's a different world now for you and me and we're just going to have to adapt. Just don't agitate Dr. StrangeWater, and you two might become friends in about 200 years. Sorry if some of this cracks me up, but I've been watching a lot of Peter Sellers movies lately. Cheers, pacplyer ex MAC mo-fo (supplemental) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On 7 Aug 2003 20:25:14 -0700, (Snowbird) wrote:
Would you gents mind changing the Subject: line? While I agree with you (and usually change the subject line myself), lately we've been getting a batch of folks who complain when you do that.... On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 00:45:28 -0500, Big John wrote: ]In the Nuc business there are very strict codes that have to be ]followed both in the office AND OUT. Any deviation from what is ]considered normal is subject to close scrutiny and if true out you go. ]Safety is paramount and crazy behavior is a key item that will get you ]booted. Wasn't just nuke programs...had the same sort of thing ('Human Reliability Program') while I was in ADCOM. Monitor your co-worker, report if he or she starts acting funny, has marital problems, shows unexplained wealth, etc. Oddly enough, the fact that a batch of us lieutenants all owned fairly late model sports cars (Corvettes, Porsches, Trans-Ams, etc.) seemed to be considered normal. :-) I always think of the Alistair MacLean quote: "There are prisons in America and cushy hotels in Moscow filled with people who had top security clearances...." At some point, you just have to trust people. In all honesty, I *really* pity the poor security folks nowadays. Thirty years ago, they had to worry that someone would contact the Russians and obtain a tiny camera which would allow them to shoot five or six grainy, poorly-exposed photos of classified documents. Nowadays, you can go online and buy a watch with a built-in USB storage system (including the connecting cable, which tucks into the band) and walk home with hundreds of classified documents invisibly strapped onto your wrist. http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/watches/5eec/ Twenty years ago, we couldn't bring calculators with memories into the work areas (I once had a security officer pick up a calculator I was using and ask, "Is that a classified number?"). Today, most engineering and management types are wedded to their PDAs, and the security guys either have to allow them in or cripple the true work. No. I wouldn't want to be a security officer. Ron Wanttaja |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message
... SNIP In all honesty, I *really* pity the poor security folks nowadays. Thirty years ago, they had to worry that someone would contact the Russians and obtain a tiny camera which would allow them to shoot five or six grainy, poorly-exposed photos of classified documents. Nowadays, you can go online and buy a watch with a built-in USB storage system (including the connecting cable, which tucks into the band) and walk home with hundreds of classified documents invisibly strapped onto your wrist. http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/watches/5eec/ Twenty years ago, we couldn't bring calculators with memories into the work areas (I once had a security officer pick up a calculator I was using and ask, "Is that a classified number?"). Today, most engineering and management types are wedded to their PDAs, and the security guys either have to allow them in or cripple the true work. Security level must have been low if PDAs were allowed in/out without checking/vetting several steps along the way. PDAs still had to be cleared, initially, where I worked two years ago and they were checked going in and out of the secured facility. One chap made the mistake of replacing his PDA with a newer model and was more than a bit perturbed as they proceeded to dismantle it in front of him - basically destroyed the unit. I guess that was part of the intent. :-) There is security, and then there is real security. :-) Michael Pilla |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Ron Wanttaja wrote in message . ..
On 7 Aug 2003 20:25:14 -0700, (Snowbird) wrote: Would you gents mind changing the Subject: line? While I agree with you (and usually change the subject line myself), lately we've been getting a batch of folks who complain when you do that.... There's a Far Side cartoon which features a man standing in front of two doors labeled "damned if you do" and "damned if you don't", with a devil poking him with a pitchfork and saying "c'mon, c'mon... you've got to choose, it's either one or the other" No. I wouldn't want to be a security officer. Concur. There's also that fact that whatever screening criteria are being used, they've spectacularly failed to catch several very damaging "moles" Cheers Sydney |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"It's light blue." "No, it's light gray." "What?!? It's white!" "No way stupid, it's light blue!" "Light gray!" "White, moron! White, white, WHITE!" So there may have been more to his clearance revocation than just the one statement:-) Mike There probably was, but there needn't have been. I've had people under me I had to go to battle for over ridiculous things similar to this. Once the security root-worms get you in their sights, you become interesting to them. They then start digging. All of what they can dig up can be circumstantial, doesn't matter. If they can simply tell a reasonably convincing story that your "Character" might not be good, you lose the clearance. Yes, it can be based upon their perception of your "Character" and that alone. I've seen it happen. I think the FAA has acted about as poorly in some cases since a certificate is not a right, it's a privilege. Dr. Strangewater |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|