If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Terminal velocity of bombs?
Was half paying attention to a TV doco on the Dambusters a few mins ago
and thought I heard the narrator say the Earthquake bomb designed by Barnes Wallis broke the sound barrie on its way down. Comments anyone? ronh -- "People do not make decisions on facts, rather, how they feel about the facts" Robert Consedine |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:20:05 +1200, in rec.aviation.military
(BackToNormal) wrote: Was half paying attention to a TV doco on the Dambusters a few mins ago and thought I heard the narrator say the Earthquake bomb designed by Barnes Wallis broke the sound barrie on its way down. Comments anyone? Methinks you may have misinterpereted something. Iron bombs have the same terminal velocity as everything else, about 135 mph, IIRC. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police,
BackToNormal blurted out: Was half paying attention to a TV doco on the Dambusters a few mins ago and thought I heard the narrator say the Earthquake bomb designed by Barnes Wallis broke the sound barrie on its way down. Comments anyone? Try http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/termv.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police,
BackToNormal blurted out: Comments anyone? Also try this http://hypertextbook.com/facts/JianHuang.shtml |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
BackToNormal asked:
Comments anyone? How 'bout this http://www.saltspring.com/brochmann/...Ball-1.00.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
When dropped from (IIRC) 40,000' it was supposed to become supersonic
(original design spec). As it was dropped from a much lower altitude (20,000'??) it didn't(?). The Tallboys and Grandslams had a well designed ballistic shape and could accelerate to these velocities BackToNormal wrote: Was half paying attention to a TV doco on the Dambusters a few mins ago and thought I heard the narrator say the Earthquake bomb designed by Barnes Wallis broke the sound barrie on its way down. Comments anyone? ronh |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"William Hughes" wrote in message
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:20:05 +1200, in rec.aviation.military (BackToNormal) wrote: Was half paying attention to a TV doco on the Dambusters a few mins ago and thought I heard the narrator say the Earthquake bomb designed by Barnes Wallis broke the sound barrie on its way down. Comments anyone? Methinks you may have misinterpereted something. Iron bombs have the same terminal velocity as everything else, about 135 mph, IIRC. I think you're the one misinterpreting. Terminal velocity varies widely for different objects -- it's a function of density, drag, and weight. http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/termv.html -- Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail "If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
William Hughes wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:20:05 +1200, in rec.aviation.military (BackToNormal) wrote: Was half paying attention to a TV doco on the Dambusters a few mins ago and thought I heard the narrator say the Earthquake bomb designed by Barnes Wallis broke the sound barrie on its way down. Comments anyone? Methinks you may have misinterpereted something. Iron bombs have the same terminal velocity as everything else, about 135 mph, IIRC. Hey guys...lookit that feather fallin there!...is it ever friggen moven !! -- -Gord. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:02:55 -0500, William Hughes
wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:20:05 +1200, in rec.aviation.military (BackToNormal) wrote: Was half paying attention to a TV doco on the Dambusters a few mins ago and thought I heard the narrator say the Earthquake bomb designed by Barnes Wallis broke the sound barrie on its way down. Comments anyone? Methinks you may have misinterpereted something. Iron bombs have the same terminal velocity as everything else, about 135 mph, IIRC. Think a bit about how gravity works and what "terminal velocity" actually *is*. A human might fall about that fast because of their density and drag. And that's at low altitude. Someone bailing out at high altitude where the air is thinner will fall much faster. Something with less drag or higher density will too. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Kerryn Offord" The Tallboys and Grandslams had a well designed ballistic shape and could accelerate to these velocities Seems to me I heard somewhere that a high altitude parachutist was going to try and break the sound barrier! Anyone know anything about this? Ed |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS Velocity 173 RG | Oscaź | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 17th 04 08:47 PM |
Question for flying Velocity SE/SUV owners. | Dave S | Home Built | 0 | August 25th 04 04:51 PM |
Velocity ride in Houston area? | Martin Whitfield | Home Built | 4 | May 27th 04 04:29 AM |
Velocity builder mailing list/web board ? | Kent Sorensen | Home Built | 1 | October 25th 03 04:01 AM |
#1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |