If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
LPV only?
Apologies for the reply-to-self. Pulled the Send trigger a little to
quick: On Oct 31, 11:39 pm, Jon wrote: They have been collecting SIS for at least a decade and know more about all . the details that are hapeening inside tho various 250-bit WAAS messages continuously being broadcast, than just about anyone. To be fair, some folks at Stanford, FAA, and of course, Raytheon, are right up there as they were all key players, from Requirements on through to Deployment; but the group at the TC are the ones that ran the initial flight certification trials, ran the 60-day stability test prior to IOC, and continue work with the bits/bytes day in and day out. The periodic PAN reports are available for those that want to dig deeper down, and perhaps for others that may have trouble falling asleep at night : http://www.nstb.tc.faa.gov/ArchiveList.html Regards, Jon |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
LPV only?
On Oct 31, 1:27 pm, Doug Carter wrote:
Have any WAAS LPV approaches been established for runways that do not already have an ILS in place? I'm presuming the limiting factor is LPV deployment is clearing the approach airspace, lighting, runway length rather than drawing the approach plate... Does the FAA publish its priorities or a schedule of new/improved approaches? -- My home airport at MGY has had an LPV for some time. We do not have an ILS, but we do have a LOC approach. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|