If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Comparison between Cirrus SR20/22 and Columbia(Lancair) 350/400
OK Larry:
How large is your family, both in number and weight? 3 family members or friends, not too very large - european average, about 240 kg max What is the distance of the average business trip? Min: 250 km - local Max: Bucharest, Romania - London,UK How do you rank the desirability of speed, style, and comfort? Speed - Very important Comfort - Important Style - Important What is your budget? 500.000 USD Where are you located? Bucharest, Romania, Eastern Europe |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Comparison between Cirrus SR20/22 and Columbia(Lancair) 350/400
Matt, I need a plane easy to flight, because I'm a beginner VFR pilot,
for cross country trips, for me and my family. In the same time, I need a plane suitable for business trips. Get a 172 or an Archer. It's a bit slower but it won't kill you as easily. As a beginner VFR pilot, that is very important. A 172 or Archer is quite suitable for business trips. Jose -- "Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry Potter). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Comparison between Cirrus SR20/22 and Columbia(Lancair) 350/400
"Drakkar" wrote:
Matt, I need a plane easy to flight, because I'm a beginner VFR pilot, for cross country trips, for me and my family. In the same time, I need a plane suitable for business trips. Don't take this personally but we may be seeing the starting point of another Cirrus parachute deployment incident (or deadly crash). "Beginner VFR pilot wants sleek fast airplane." There is nothing wrong with you wanting a sleek fast airplane but you should make sure that you have the training and experience to handle that plane AND just as important the judgement to know when not to fly. Ron Lee |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Comparison between Cirrus SR20/22 and Columbia(Lancair) 350/400
Drakkar,
In the same time, I need a plane suitable for business trips. You may know this already, but the kind of business trips you have in mind will be severely impacted by weather in central Europe (I fly out of Hamburg, Germany). You will often not be able to do these flights VFR. However, you may often be able to do them IFR - but you need to gain experience VFR first, to get your IFR rating. There are different schools of thinking in this. One is that it might make sense to do your training from the start in an advanced aircraft like the Cirrus or the Columbia, and if you proceed to use these aircraft in accordance with your (growing) abilities and fly with an instructor often, even after getting the license, you might be flying safely. The other way of thinking says that it is an unacceptable risk to start in an aircraft as advanced as that. It all depends on a lot of factors, like the amount of time and "mental dedication" you can make available for your flight training. E.g. Lufthansa's basic flight training is in Beechcraft Bonanzas - a plane comparable in complexity to the ones you mention. But these students do nothing but learning to fly, all day long. The average student learns in simpler aircraft. Have you looked at the Diamond DA-40 TDI? That might be a good compromise between simplicity and the other factors you mention. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Comparison between Cirrus SR20/22 and Columbia(Lancair) 350/400
"Drakkar" wrote in message oups.com... OK, I understand your point. So, according to you, which airplane is the most suitable for me and my needs? You didn't mention your current experience. Piper Archer or a C-182 if you need more hauling capacity. Then in a few years when you have more experience move up to either of the fast planes you mentioned. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Comparison between Cirrus SR20/22 and Columbia(Lancair) 350/400
"Drakkar" wrote in message oups.com... Please, need help! I really need a good advice: Beetween Cirrus SR20/22 and Columbia(Lancair) 350/400, which is the best choice? And, of course, for what reason? Thank you very much for your help Vlad Honestly, either of those planes could do a real good job of killing you and your family. You need to crawl before you walk. Start out in a Cessna 172 or something similar. The Cirrus and Lancair are not beginner planes. --------------------------------------------- DW |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Comparison between Cirrus SR20/22 and Columbia(Lancair) 350/400
On 2 Nov 2006 04:55:14 -0800, "Drakkar"
wrote in .com: OK Larry: How large is your family, both in number and weight? 3 family members or friends, not too very large - european average, about 240 kg max What is the distance of the average business trip? Min: 250 km - local Max: Bucharest, Romania - London,UK How do you rank the desirability of speed, style, and comfort? Speed - Very important Comfort - Important Style - Important What is your budget? 500.000 USD Where are you located? Bucharest, Romania, Eastern Europe As you are doubtless aware, most four-place aircraft won't carry four people, full fuel, and baggage for four. One remarkable exception is the Piper PA28-235 (or 236) which has a useful load of about 1,500 lbs, so if you fill it with 85 gallons, it will still carry nearly 1,000 lbs. A Piper PA32 Cherokee Six(fixed gear) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piper_Cherokee_Six or a Piper Lance or Saratoga http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piper_Saratoga meets most of your criteria also, but you'd probably have to acquires some minimum number of hours in-type before you would qualify for insurance coverage. You'll find information about new ones he http://www.newpiper.com/ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Comparison between Cirrus SR20/22 and Columbia(Lancair) 350/400
Is there anyone here who would suggest a Cirrus airplane because it has
a parachute rescue system? Perhaps the OP's wife would feel better if the airplane had a parachute. Gerd Drakkar wrote: Please, need help! I really need a good advice: Beetween Cirrus SR20/22 and Columbia(Lancair) 350/400, which is the best choice? And, of course, for what reason? Thank you very much for your help Vlad |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Comparison between Cirrus SR20/22 and Columbia(Lancair) 350/400
"gwengler" wrote in message oups.com... Is there anyone here who would suggest a Cirrus airplane because it has a parachute rescue system? Perhaps the OP's wife would feel better if the airplane had a parachute. Gerd I think that getting the plane, mainly because it has a parachute is the WORST reason to choose it and I have nothing against the Cirrus if I could afford one there would be one in my hanger right this second. If you are buying the plane because it has a parachute odds are you are going to have the mind set that the parachute can get you out of anything. The OP, his wife and children would be way better off with him buy a plane at half the cost and getting a bunch more training. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Comparison between Cirrus SR20/22 and Columbia(Lancair) 350/400
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Drakkar" wrote in message oups.com... Please, need help! I really need a good advice: Beetween Cirrus SR20/22 and Columbia(Lancair) 350/400, which is the best choice? And, of course, for what reason? Impossible to answer. Even if you had carefully defined and explained your own mission criteria, the answer would be full of "ifs" and caveats. Without that, it's impossible to say. Both makes of airplanes represent a solid evolution of aircraft technology, providing what I feel are excellent values for the money. Which specifically is the one for you depends on your own specific needs and desires. AND skills. How many hours total does the OP have, and how many in fast high performance, and what type? Ratings? -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|