A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

November 1955 article in Approach magazine



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 28th 07, 12:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
Greasy Rider[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default November 1955 article in Approach magazine


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"From the November 1955 issue of APPROACH Magazine"

Again, the Naval Aviation Safety Center has obtained a factual
account of a flight situation of such impact as to warrant special
treatment. And again, as in the presentation of the "Man With the
Banjo" (Aviation Safety Bulletin No. 20-54) the report is offered
without editorial comment and with only a brief introduction.

--and then there were none--

It was a "routine" flight by members of a reserve squadron - eight
pilots were scheduled; seven got airborne; five continued the flight
to its unscheduled conclusion; one pilot died.

Concerning the five pilots, it is believed that their individual
experience and backgrounds provide a fairly typical cross-section of
reserve aviation. The list, which might well be repeated in any of a
hundred similar activities, includes a manager of an electrical
supply firm, the director of industrial relations for an oil
refinery, a member of a construction company, an associate of a
farmers' cooperative supply organization, and the director of a local
chamber of commerce.

Married, family men almost without exception, these pilots drive or
are flown to their base once each month to engage in three or four
flights and to log an average of about 10 flight hours per month.

This is their story.

EIGHT reserve pilots were scheduled for a VFR cross-country
navigation flight to provide cruise control training in F9F-7s prior
to engaging in forthcoming maneuvers. Originally projected several
months before, the flight received final approval and pilots were
designated about 1030 one Saturday morning.

Because of the relatively short notice on which the flight was
finally undertaken, the squadron found it necessary to obtain two
replacement pilots from a local companion squadron. One of the
replacements was designated flight leader because he had the
necessary instrument qualification required for such flights.

Of the eight pilots scheduled, three had flown a hop the previously
during the day; only four had made cross-country flights in the F9F-
7. As finally organized, the flight appeared something like this:
Number 1: (flight leader) received checkout in F9F-7 two
months before and had logged 10.7 hours in model.
Number 2: Checked out in model a year previously and had
about 60 hours in model.
Number 3: Checked out in model previous year and had about 30
hours in model.
Number 4: Checked out in model a year before; had about 29
hours in model.
Number 5: Checked out about two months before and had
approximately 20 hours in model.
Number 6: Checked out a year before; had 20 hours in model.
Number 7: Checked out about three months before; had about
five hours in model.
Number 8: Checked out a year before; had some 40 hours in
model.

Distance of the flight was 555 miles over a route which approached
mountainous terrain near the destination. Weather briefing noted a
tornado well to the southwest of the route and scattered
thunderstorms predicted en route. Time en route was one hour 30
minutes, with the flight to arrive over destination with an estimated
1840 pounds of fuel remaining.

Preflight planning was accomplished with most of the pilots working
out their own flight plans, and with the flight leader completing a
briefing "as thorough as any flight I ever briefed."

Starting, departure from the line and preliminary radio check was
according to normal procedure. One aircraft was delayed on starting
and was left at the line. Radio communications check proved difficult,
with considerable shifting of frequency required to establish a
common tactical channel.

On reaching the head of the runway there was an initial delay of
several minutes while a number of aircraft landed. Takeoff was at
1705. Joinup after takeoff was quickly accomplished and the leader
then circled the field at a low altitude to check the status of the
delayed aircraft, which failed to leave the line. Flight members
figured that some 800 pounds of fuel had been expended during delays.

Then There Were Seven
Departure and climb to 36,000 feet on a northwest course was
uneventful, but approximately 110 miles out on course the No.5 and
No.6 men returned to base after reporting excessive fuel consumption.
No.7 then moved up into the No.5 position astern.

Then There Were Five

About 200 miles on course the flight encountered the first
thunderstorm, an anvil head at about 32,000-34,000 feet, which they
were able to drop under without difficulty. Thereafter several small
thunderheads were flown over. Weather to the north and east of course
appeared relatively clear.

About 250 miles out the canopy of No.5, formerly No.7 began icing
over despite constant use of manual control, and in a short time he
was looking out "through a dollar-sized hole." In a few minutes,
however, the icing abruptly disappeared.

A radio check netted the report that destination weather was a
comfortable 15,000 feet, scattered, with thunderstorms to the
southeast.

Noting what appeared to be a sizable thunderstorm ahead, the flight
began climbing to top it. At this time No.5 began to lag behind. When
the flight had attained 38,000-40,000 feet, and was nearing the
thunderstorm, the flight leader advised he was reducing power to 87
percent to allow No.5 to catch up. No.5 gave a count for a DF steer
from the planes ahead, which he could no longer see. On reduction of
power by the leader, Nos. 3 and 4 overran and used their excess speed
to pull up slightly higher than the rest the flight.

Now No.3 called in that he as encountering stall in his airplane and
No.5 noted the same condition. At this time pilot, possibly No.3,
suggested reversal of course, but No.4, higher than the others,
reported he could see over the top of the thunderstorm.

Just short of the thunderstorm the leader began a left turn which
immediately aggravated the stall of the aircraft. Mushing
considerably, the flight entered the cloud, No.2 entering first,
followed No.1, No.4 held course and altitude. No. 3's actions from
this point are not known, but possibly he elected to go down through
the clouds. No.5 attempted a 180 but stalled through the tops of the
thunderstorms at about 39,000 feet.

From this point the integrity of the flight disappeared as each of
the remaining pilots found himself in a situation requiring a
separate solution. The account of how each pilot attempted to solve
his individual problem follows.

Lose Leader

Completing his turn away from the cloud and circling in the clear at
about 34,000-36,000, No.1 began calling the flight, but was unable to
establish satisfactory communications. He then began a decent in the
trough paralleling the near side of the cloud, throttle at idle, and
leveled at 17,000 feet to go around the edge of the thunderhead and
to resume base course.

It was then apparent that le 1500 pounds of fuel remaining would be
insufficient to make destination, and No.1 began looking for a place
to land. Following a highway he descended to 5000 feet to select a
stretch on which to set down. After dragging the road for
obstructions he made an approach over a pickup truck and touched
down, blowing a tire as brakes were applied. On landing runout he
noted a slight hill over which he might expect to see a car come at
any time, so he turned off the highway at a side road intersection to
clear. A car immediately came over the hill to investigate the low
flying airplane.

Driven into a nearby town the pilot obtained the services of a
tractor and a hired hand to tow the plane into town. This was
accomplished after a few mishaps involved in being towed off the
pavement onto the soft shoulder.

Thereafter No.1 was advised of the crash of another aircraft some 40
miles away and was driven to the scene to assist in its
identification.

Then There Were Four

On entering the cloud, No.2 elected to descend through what he
assumed to be only a layer, to bust out under, and remain contact to
go on to destination.
He extended speed brakes, reduced throttle and began a 5000-6000 fpm
rate of descent, holding base course. The descent was considerably
prolonged. He first encountered lightning and then severe turbulence,
and meanwhile he attempted to hold a nose-down attitude to prevent
stalling.

After the first period of turbulence No.2 became concerned about his
altitude with reference to surrounding terrain, believing that below
15,000 feet he would be dangerously near to the mountains ahead. He
turned north, and got into more violent turbulence, lost control of
the airplane a couple of times and at 15,000 feet decided to eject.
Still in turbulence, still in a dive, he jettisoned his canopy (he
lost his helmet but does not recall when this occurred), and
releasing the controls, pulled the curtain. Nothing happened, but he
had been told that he might reasonably expect a two or three-second
delay in the firing of the seat, so he was not particularly upset
over the delay.

Curtain over his chin, he waited-then decided to peek around the
curtain to see if he were still in the airplane. He was. He released
the curtain, waited, still diving, considered re-safetying the
curtain, discarded the idea and went back to driving the airplane

While considering his next move he saw the ground materializing below
to show that he still had a safe altitude. Breaking out beneath the
clouds at about 5500 feet he retracted speed brakes and took up an
easterly heading, unable to get much speed because of the absence of
the canopy. After searching for a time for a place to land, he
selected a stretch of highway, near a town. He was down to 500 pounds
of fuel now. Checking the wind from the local trash dump he made an
approach over an automobile at about 150 feet, leveled at 10 feet,
cut the throttle and landed. Slowing to taxi, he folded the wings to
cross a bridge and continued into town where he turned off to park on
a side street.

After his report was made, arrangements were made for a nearby air
station to send a crew with another canopy, fuel, a starter unit, and
to disarm the hot seat. Faced with the problem of what to do with o
the seat cartridge, the pilot considered throwing it into a lake,
burying it, and then obtained a shotgun from a patrolman and shot the
side of the shell open, rupturing it so the powder could be removed.
The shell case was turned over to investigating personnel for further
check

When the airplane was ready for flight, it was pushed by local
citizens back to the highway, which was blocked off. A clear stretch
of road about a mile in length was then available before the highway
crossed a low bridge. Thereafter, another mile of open highway was
usable. There was no fuel in the wing tanks; elevation of
the "field" - was 2200feet.

The airplane was almost airborne at the first bridge, and in
accordance with his pre-planning, the pilot was able to lift the
plane up on the oleos to clear the bridge safely. Thereafter he was
airborne on the second stretch of runway.

After I got off," said the pilot, "I came back and made a pass by the
town to do a roll of appreciation for their help.

Then There Were Three

Because No.3 was not observed from the time the flight entered the
top of the cloud, nor were any radio transmissions heard, his actions
may only be guessed. The airplane crashed some 40 miles away from the
point at which No.1 landed. The plane hit in a near-vertical angle on
the corner of a cement foundation of a farm structure, digging a
large hole and being demolished by the impact.

After the initial inspection the investigating party concluded that
the ejection seat was not in the wreckage. Shortly thereafter,
because of the inconvenience caused the property owner by the crowds
of spectators and souvenir hunters attracted to the scene, it was
decided to bulldoze the wreckage into the hole and to cover it up.
The pilot was later found, dead of injuries which' possibly resulted
from hitting some part of the plane on bailout. Questions then raised
concerning the absence of the ejection seat prompted the re-opening
of the crash hole to re-examine the wreckage. Parts of the ejection
seat were then found in the wreckage.

Then There Were Two

The No.4 man stated that from his position 1000-2000 feet above the
rest of the flight, he could see over the top of the cloud, and
recommended going over.

However, when the leader reduced power to allow No.5 to catch up,
No.4 encountered, stall and began to lose altitude. He increased
power to 100 percent but still lost some 1000 feet more. A tentative
turn with the rest of the flight increased the stall and he returned
to base course and was in the cloud. He too, thought he would be able
to penetrate quickly.

Within the cloud, he reports that his fuel consumption appeared to
have increased, and he decided to get down in order to have some fuel
remaining for landing. At this time he had about 1500 pounds.
Knowing that a range of mountains was directly ahead on course he
turned to parallel the mountains and continued his descent at about
4000 fpm. He too encountered violent turbulence but the airplane
handled very well and he ever lost control. He attempted to raise CAA
and Navy towers without success and then called "Mayday." His only
answer was from an Air Force B-25 which gave him some idea of weather
conditions beyond the storm area.

At 15,000 feet he heard No. 2 call he was in the clear. At 12,000
feet the fuel warning light came on (he had not retarded throttle
during his descent). At 11,000 feet he broke out beneath the
thunderstorm and turned to intercept base course. After attempting to
locate himself by landmarks and down to 700 pounds of fuel remaining
he circled a reservoir with the intention of a water ditching.

Noting the length of the reservoir dam, about 9300 feet, and its
width, some 25 feet, he elected to try and land on the dam itself.
To one side, the water level was about 15 feet below the top of the
dam. On the other side was a drop of about 250 feet. A guard rail,
about three feet high ran along either edge of the dam.

On touchdown, he avoided use of brakes and, flaps clattering on the
tops of the guardrail pipes, completed the rollout and added power to
taxi off the far end of the dam. Taxing down to some buildings he was
met by an irate reclamation official who advised him that "Son,
you're in trouble! You can't go landing on government property like
this!"

Shortly thereafter, arrangements were made to report the landing and
for the removal of the airplane.

Then There WAS One

At the time the formation approached the cloud, No., 5 was at about
39,000 feet at about, 170 knots, stalling through the tops of the
clouds. On trying to make a 180, he stalled and mushed into the
clouds. Attempting to fly out of the clouds on instruments, he also
hit violent turbulence, being flipped on his back and getting into
other unusual attitudes.

At times he was gaining 6000 fpm and at other times he was descending
4000 fpm. He came out below the clouds at 17,000 feet in a slight
nosedown turn, but a low airspeed brought on a stall. He nosed over to pick
up
speed and lost altitude down to 6000 feet. He then climbed back to
15,000, having about 1900 pounds of fuel left.

Taking up an easterly course away from the storm area he was unable
to establish his position, and spotting an abandoned airstrip, with
only 700 pounds of fuel indicated, he elected to land. The strip was
about 5800 feet long, and landing was without incident. No.5
then "took a chance and started walking." He was later informed that
he was quite fortunate in his choice of direction, for had he taken
the opposite direction he would have found no houses, just a long
stretch of open country.

He found a house and was able to report his landing and arrange for
fuel to be brought to the airstrip. Then, he reports, "I got my
biggest shock when I saw a spectator smoking near the airplane as it
was being fueled!" The plane was returned to base.

- And Then There Were None.

The Aviation Safety Center is indebted to the pilots who voluntarily
provided this candid account for the benefit of other pilots.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(Translated article) Saipan attacks by IJAAF, November 1944 Gernot Hassenpflug Military Aviation 7 October 8th 03 04:23 PM
Time Magazine article B-1B Jim Baker Military Aviation 1 July 31st 03 10:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.