If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Santa Monica discord continues
https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/...ta-monica-deal
Huerta explains Santa Monica deal February 2, 2017 By Alyssa J. Miller A deal between the FAA and the city of Santa Monica, California, became official Feb. 1 when the Honorable John F. Walter of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California signed a detailed stipulation and order/consent decree that requires the city to keep Santa Monica Municipal Airport open and operating with reasonable services until Dec. 31, 2028, upon which time it has the option to close the facility. Santa Monica Municipal Airport. Photo by Mike Fizer. Santa Monica Municipal Airport. Photo by Mike Fizer. The agreement has upset many on both sides of the battle over Santa Monica airport. “We’re not going to stop fighting for Santa Monica,” vowed AOPA President Mark Baker. “This gives us some certainty that it’s not going to close tomorrow, or next month, or next year. Now we have time to change minds and make sure this airport continues to operate as it should.” “There’s an extended period of time for the market to adjust,” said FAA Administrator Michael Huerta in an exclusive interview with AOPA, “but frankly there’s also a period of time for the industry, for the city, and the aviation community in Southern California to perhaps think about alternatives that might be out there as well.” Huerta suggested that the aviation community consider presenting alternatives to closing the airport to the city during the interim. “Twelve years is a long time and it does provide, I think, a framework for those discussions to take place,” Huerta said. The settlement agreement allows the city of Santa Monica to shorten its 4,973-foot runway to an operational length of 3,500 feet after providing 30 days’ notice. The runway safety areas at both ends of the runway are not included in the 3,500 feet, but the agreement does not define the length of those safety areas. The city will be responsible for the cost of shortening the runway but can still apply for federal funds through the FAA, as other airport operators can. During the interim while the city is shortening the runway, Huerta said, “We’re really looking to them to work in good faith with the users of the airport, to work in good faith with us,” adding that “based on the conversations that we have had, I’m feeling pretty good that they will.” The city can either provide airport services itself, such as fuel sales, or enter leases with tenants to provide those services. If the city offers leases to tenants, they must have a three-year minimum, and all terms must be “reasonable” to those provided at other airports similar to Santa Monica. No hard limits were set on fuel prices or landing, ramp, or hangar or tiedown fees. Huerta said the FAA would not get “in the business of setting prices,” explaining that “reasonable and customary business practices are what we’re going to be looking for in terms of how the city operates the airport there.” He encouraged airport users to talk to the city about prices and their needs because the city now has an incentive to operate the airport because it must remain open until the end of 2028. Decades of litigation settled The city and the FAA have engaged in litigation for more than three decades regarding the airport’s future, Huerta noted. The litigation surrounded two types of contracts the city of Santa Monica and the federal government had entered. One was a difference of views between the two entities as to when the contractual obligations for operating an airport after accepting federal funding expired. Federal grant assurances require that airports remain open and operating for 20 years after funds have been granted. The city of Santa Monica had received federal Airport Improvement Program funds in 1994 and then additional funds through an amendment to that grant in 2003. The point being contended was whether the 20-year period expired in 2014 or if it would remain in effect until 2023. The other point of litigation regarded whether the airport must be operated in perpetuity and is related to two contracts at the end of the 1940s, when the federal government stopped using the airport for military purposes after World War II. The city and the FAA had been in negotiation since 2016, Huerta said, when the ninth Circuit Court of Appeals https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2016/may/17/appeals-court-reverses-dismissal-in-smo-case a district court’s decision granting the FAA’s appeal to dismiss Santa Monica’s continued bids to close the airport. That unfavorable ruling for the federal government helped spur the agency to open discussions with the city. Huerta said the parties had to negotiate the city’s rights to its land and the aeronautical obligations to the government while providing a level of certainty and extended operations for tenants at the airport. “Land use is a local responsibility,” Huerta explained. “The FAA’s interest in this case and in dealing with any city or any state is really more a contractual matter. Are they complying with contracts they have entered into with the federal government?” Contractual compliance with grant assurances had been the FAA’s interest when it issued a cease-and-desist order late last year after the city of Santa Monica issued eviction notices to Atlantic Aviation and American Flyers. The settlement agreement resolves all pending disputes between the city and the FAA. Settlement does not set a precedent With many airport operators and the entire general aviation community following the Santa Monica case to determine what any decisions could mean for airports elsewhere, the settlement does not set a precedent, according to Huerta. “It is an incredibly complicated situation, a very unique set of facts that relate to Santa Monica,” Huerta said. Because of the settlement, the courts never ruled regarding federal surplus property being returned to cities, he said. Huerta also explained that the length of grant assurance obligations was never a question; Huerta clarified that the lawsuits over the grant assurances were based on a difference in opinion of the expiration date, not on the length of the obligations in general. He also said the agency would continue to ensure that airport operators comply with the contractual agreements they commit to when accepting federal funding. “I don’t think it sets any precedent,” Huerta said. ================================================== =============================== https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/...deal-protested Santa Monica discord continues Next steps remain in question February 7, 2017 By Jim Moore The court-approved FAA settlement with the city of Santa Monica, California, over the future of its municipal airport was negotiated in secrecy, and the terms sparked anger and surprise from both airport supporters and airport opponents when the deal became public. As both sides look to the future, much remains in question. AOPA photo by Mike Fizer. AOPA has been in the thick of the decades-long battle over the airport, and will continue to work to extend the life of Santa Monica Municipal Airport beyond Dec. 31, 2028, AOPA President Mark Baker said soon after the surprise settlement became public. Protesters and local officials who gathered Feb. 4 at the Santa Monica Business Park to voice outrage over the agreement decried the fact that the city is now forced to keep the airport open for at least 12 more years. The city council narrowly approved the settlement by a 4-to-3 vote. Meanwhile, AOPA and other airport advocates have clear goals and objectives for the next 12 years—chief among those is to change local attitudes and views and educate the community about the value of the local resource. FAA Administrator Michael Huerta, in an interview with AOPA, said the city is obligated under the agreement to allow tenants to provide aviation services, or may, as other municipal airport operators do, provide services (including aviation fuel) itself. “We’re really looking to them to work in good faith with the users of the airport, to work in good faith with us,” Huerta said, referring to city officials and adding that “based on the conversations that we have had, I’m feeling pretty good that they will.” Mayor Ted Winterer, who voted with the majority to approve the settlement, spoke openly days later about exploiting loopholes, the Santa Monica Daily Press reported in its account of the Feb. 4 anti-airport rally. “We will, in six months, shorten that runway to 3,500 feet,” Winterer said, according to the newspaper, and added that the city believes the shorter runway will reduce air traffic by 44 percent. “Winterer went so far as to say the City will exploit every loophole available to reduce air traffic,” the local paper reported. Santa Monica Airport Association President Christian Fry told AOPA that he also attended that Feb. 4 rally, and that city officials openly discussed what Fry considers “draconian” measures to reduce airport use, including “security inspections” of every aircraft, and installation of Plexiglas barriers between observation and aircraft movement areas to discourage airplane watching. “They’re saying things, even just a couple of days ago, that are pretty inflammatory in my opinion,” Fry said. He said the local airport advocacy group continues to consult with attorneys and with advocacy groups including AOPA and the National Business Aviation Association, and has not yet decided on next steps. “We’re really trying to evaluate all of the options,” Fry said, adding that those will likely include renewed efforts to build public support for the airport’s long-term existence. Huerta said the city must present a detailed plan for FAA approval before shortening the runway to 3,500 feet (as the settlement allows). Huerta said the FAA will review the runway (de)construction plan in detail with an eye on several factors, including safety and the impact on local airspace users. Santa Monica Municipal Airport has long been a reliever for Los Angeles International Airport, located just eight miles away, and the impact of curtailing Santa Monica airport use will be among the considerations before the FAA approves any changes to the layout. “That’s something we’ll need to evaluate based on what their specific plan looks like,” Huerta told AOPA. Santa Monica Municipal Airport has throughout its long history been an asset to the local economy, creating or supporting tens of thousands of jobs over the decades, as well as generating tax revenues, local economic activity, and other benefits for the community such as its availability to provide critical transportation links in the event of a natural disaster. The settlement agreement has already begun to curtail economic activity: JetSuiteX had planned to begin operating low-cost charter flights out of Santa Monica this month, and placed those plans on indefinite hold soon after the settlement was announced. “We apologize to our clients, over half of whom are Santa Monica residents, who have been adversely affected by the unprecedented recent events concerning SMO airport,” CEO Alex Wilcox said in a statement issued by the company. The company had sold about 1,000 tickets since announcing the planned flights in December, and Wilcox said those customers would all receive full refunds. Fry said the Santa Monica Airport Association was among the many taken by surprise as the FAA settlement was announced, having been privy to none of its details, or even the existence of negotiations. “We’re certainly not happy at all about the shortening of the runway,” Fry said, noting that such a move would limit the airport's utility. “We’re also concerned about the safety implications of a shorter runway.” Fry said the airport is much like an interstate highway that traverses the city, in that the airport, while physically located in the city, serves as an access point to the national transportation infrastructure. “That on-ramp and off-ramp to the airspace system is part of the national infrastructure, and I believe should be protected on a national level,” Fry said. He remains hopeful that six more election cycles will yield new attitudes from city government about the airport’s value to the community. Huerta said the FAA will hold the city to its obligations to provide services and operate the airport. “Reasonable and customary business practices are going to be what we are going to be looking for,” Huerta said. “We’re going to be quite vigilant to ensure that the terms of the agreement are adhered to.” |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Santa Monica discord continues
On helped spur the agency to open discussions with the city.
Huerta said the parties had to negotiate the city’s rights to its land and the aeronautical obligations to the government while providing a level of certainty and extended operations for tenants at the airport. “Land use is a local responsibility,” Huerta explained. “The FAA’s interest in Can't wait for the 2030 opening of Leisure World, Santa Monica. This change will lead to billions of dollars in upgrades in West LA and Santa Monica. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
NBAA Challenges Santa Monica Deal (Was: Santa Monica discord continues)
http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news...-228508-1.html NBAA Challenges Santa Monica Deal By Russ Niles | February 16, 2017 NBAA and four businesses have petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals to review the FAA’s deal with the City of Santa Monica to shorten the airport’s runway. Under the deal, the runway would be cut immediately to 3,500 feet from almost 5,000, limiting its use and likely forcing some of the current tenants to immediately find other accommodation. Those who can use 3,500 feet will have the airport until 2028 but it’s likely the City of Santa Monica will become the fuel and maybe even the maintenance provider. "Santa Monica's airport is a vital asset to our aviation system, both locally as well as nationally, and serves as a critical transportation lifeline for the entire Los Angeles basin," Bolen added. "NBAA remains committed to aggressively supporting unrestricted business aviation access to SMO, through this petition and other available channels." NBAA alleges the deal leaves a lot of loose ends including some complaints filed by NBAA and others about the city’s administration of the airport. Among those is an allegation the city mishandled airport money. The organization is joined in the petition by two airport businesses, Bills Air Center Inc. and Davidson Aviation Inc. and two businesses that use the airport, Redgate Partners LLC and Wonderful Citrus LLC. ------------------------------------------------------------------- https://www.nbaa.org/news/pr/2017/20170213-017.php NBAA Requests Appeals Court Review of Santa Monica Airport Settlement Agreement Contact: Dan Hubbard, 202-783-9360, Washington, DC, Feb. 13, 2017 – The National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) today joined with five additional aviation stakeholders to petition the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, asking the court to review the recent agreement between Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the city of Santa Monica, CA over the future of Santa Monica Municipal Airport (SMO). Last month, the FAA announced it had reached a settlement with the city, which, in addition to permitting closure of the historic airfield at the end of 2028, would also allow the city to immediately begin the process of reducing the length of the SMO's sole runway from 4,973 feet to 3,500 feet. NBAA President and CEO Ed Bolen termed the FAA’s seeming acquiescence to a vocal minority of Santa Monica residents, "a one-of-a-kind development" that would severely restrict aviation access throughout Southern California and across the U.S. "Santa Monica's airport is a vital asset to our aviation system, both locally as well as nationally, and serves as a critical transportation lifeline for the entire Los Angeles basin," Bolen added. "NBAA remains committed to aggressively supporting unrestricted business aviation access to SMO, through this petition and other available channels." City officials have repeatedly attempted to curtail access by aviation users and other stakeholders to the airport, in defiance of established historical precedents dating back to the original 1948 instrument of transfer agreement that returned control of the former military airfield back to the city, as well as the city's federal grant obligations. In addition to today’s filing, NBAA and other stakeholders continue to review all additional options in response to the settlement agreement, including continued pursuit of several ongoing administrative complaints – not covered under the settlement – by NBAA and others over the city's federally mandated obligations. This includes a Part 16 complaint, filed by NBAA and other airport proponents, alleging that the city has mishandled airport finances, landing fees and other terms, in part through continued failure to offer leases to longstanding aviation-related businesses on the field. Other parties to the petition include the Santa Monica Airport Association, a longstanding proponent for maintaining the airport’s current presence; two airport businesses – Bill's Air Center, Inc. and Kim Davidson Aviation, Inc. – that would be directly impacted by restricted access to, and eventual closure of, SMO; and two operators, Redgate Partners, LLC; and Wonderful Citrus, LLC. View the petition. (PDF) https://www.nbaa.org/ops/airports/sm...for-Review.pdf ------------------------------------------------------ http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/arti.../#.WKdKQTWHdp8 Plane & Pilot Published February 16, 2017 NBAA Speaks Up About Santa Monica Settlement Business aviation has a surprise in store for FAA, Santa Monica. By Kate O'Connor After the FAA’s surprise settlement with the City of Santa Monica last month, which seemed to many in aviation like a betrayal by the FAA, those hoping to keep the historic Santa Monica Municipal Airport open beyond 2028 finally got some good news. On February 13, the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) announced that they have filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals to review the FAA’s decision in regards to SMO. This includes reviewing the agreement to immediately shorten the runway by 1,473 feet. The petition argues that the FAA can’t legally release the City of Santa Monica from the obligations it accepted when it got deeds and grant money for the airport from the federal government. It also holds that, because of regulations and policies already in place, the FAA can’t change the terms and conditions governing the City’s future operation of SMO or their own oversight of it. If the Court finds that those arguments are correct, the settlement will not be upheld. NBAA isn’t alone in putting forward this petition. It was joined by the Santa Monica Airport Association and several other airport stakeholders. “Santa Monica's airport is a vital asset to our aviation system, both locally as well as nationally, and serves as a critical transportation lifeline for the entire Los Angeles basin,” said NBAA President and CEO Ed Bolen. “NBAA remains committed to aggressively supporting unrestricted business aviation access to SMO, through this petition and other available channels.” The petition isn’t a last stand. NBAA and other airport stakeholders are exploring further options to keep SMO open. These include a complaint alleging that the City mishandled airport finances and additional administrative complaints over the City’s failure to meet its federally mandated obligations. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- https://www.nbaa.org/ops/airports/sm...ponse-role.php Red Cross and Citizens Highlight Santa Monica Airport’s Emergency-Response Role Jan. 15, 2017 On the otherwise unremarkable morning of Jan. 14, 10 airplanes from five airports across Los Angeles County landed at Santa Monica Municipal Airport (SMO), to demonstrate the importance of the historic airfield in serving the community during times of crisis. In a simulated disaster-response exercise, pilots in the drill hopped out of their airplanes and immediately began unloading boxes marked “Water Purification” or “Emergency Shelters,” and quickly handed off the supplies to Red Cross volunteers. The pilots and volunteers in attendance showed how SMO, as formally confirmed in city records, serves as an irreplaceable hub for emergency response. Those involved in the simulation are known as Santa Monica Airport’s Disaster Airlift Response Team (DART). “Our mission is to activate in an emergency, and act as an air bridge for the Red Cross and incident commanders,” said Dave Hopkins, vice president of the Santa Monica Airport Association (SMAA). “A drill like this is a practical example of how we could use the airport as critical infrastructure in case of an emergency.” When Roads Are Impassable... In fact, the City of Santa Monica’s All Hazards Mitigation Plan (a state-mandated preparedness document for all California cities) lists SMO among the “facilities critical to government response and recovery.” It’s a function served by general aviation (GA) airports across the country, and the DART concept came out of GA pilots’ response to California’s devastating Loma Prieta earthquake of 1989. In this exercise at Santa Monica, the DART volunteers simulated an earthquake that has closed the 405 and 10 Freeways, and the Pacific Coast Highway. In the scenario, SMO’s runway could be damaged, but still usable. Together, the 10 planes involved in the scenario could carry over 2,000 pounds of supplies into SMO, and if needed, could fly five missions per day, getting critical supplies to Red Cross volunteers on the ground, as well as the hospitals they serve. “LA-area hospitals depend on us, because the Red Cross provides 40 percent of the nation’s blood supply,” said Jeanne Woo, disaster program manager for the Red Cross Los Angeles Region. “So, any disruptions to logistics can cause huge shortages of blood.” ....A Reminder of Airports’ Role in Crisis Response During the Northridge earthquake of 1994, “a section of the 10 Freeway cracked and broke,” snarling the relief efforts of first responders and the Red Cross, said Woo, “so we’re seeing how volunteer pilots might be another way to deliver services, when communities get cut off. If they can land 10 airplanes in one hour, and each of them can carry 30 packets of blood, that could be a significant contribution.” More than 30 Red Cross and SMAA volunteers played essential roles in the DART exercise, such as dispatching flights, marshalling aircraft, loading and stockpiling supplies. Volunteer pilots flew from Van Nuys, Whiteman, Brackett Field, Compton/Woodley and Torrance Airports. The supplies used in the Jan. 14 simulation were later donated to local charities. Like SMAA, the Torrance Airport Association (TAA) has also assembled a DART team and is planning their own emergency preparedness drill, according to TAA Member Anne O’Brien, who flew into SMO for the Jan. 14 exercise. “As soon as the city council, mayor and city mangers see the capabilities of the airport for disaster response,” she said, “they get it.” ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, 09 Feb 2017 08:05:07 -0800, Larry Dighera wrote: https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/...ta-monica-deal Huerta explains Santa Monica deal February 2, 2017 By Alyssa J. Miller A deal between the FAA and the city of Santa Monica, California, became official Feb. 1 when the Honorable John F. Walter of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California signed a detailed stipulation and order/consent decree that requires the city to keep Santa Monica Municipal Airport open and operating with reasonable services until Dec. 31, 2028, upon which time it has the option to close the facility. Santa Monica Municipal Airport. Photo by Mike Fizer. Santa Monica Municipal Airport. Photo by Mike Fizer. The agreement has upset many on both sides of the battle over Santa Monica airport. “We’re not going to stop fighting for Santa Monica,” vowed AOPA President Mark Baker. “This gives us some certainty that it’s not going to close tomorrow, or next month, or next year. Now we have time to change minds and make sure this airport continues to operate as it should.” “There’s an extended period of time for the market to adjust,” said FAA Administrator Michael Huerta in an exclusive interview with AOPA, “but frankly there’s also a period of time for the industry, for the city, and the aviation community in Southern California to perhaps think about alternatives that might be out there as well.” Huerta suggested that the aviation community consider presenting alternatives to closing the airport to the city during the interim. “Twelve years is a long time and it does provide, I think, a framework for those discussions to take place,” Huerta said. The settlement agreement allows the city of Santa Monica to shorten its 4,973-foot runway to an operational length of 3,500 feet after providing 30 days’ notice. The runway safety areas at both ends of the runway are not included in the 3,500 feet, but the agreement does not define the length of those safety areas. The city will be responsible for the cost of shortening the runway but can still apply for federal funds through the FAA, as other airport operators can. During the interim while the city is shortening the runway, Huerta said, “We’re really looking to them to work in good faith with the users of the airport, to work in good faith with us,” adding that “based on the conversations that we have had, I’m feeling pretty good that they will.” The city can either provide airport services itself, such as fuel sales, or enter leases with tenants to provide those services. If the city offers leases to tenants, they must have a three-year minimum, and all terms must be “reasonable” to those provided at other airports similar to Santa Monica. No hard limits were set on fuel prices or landing, ramp, or hangar or tiedown fees. Huerta said the FAA would not get “in the business of setting prices,” explaining that “reasonable and customary business practices are what we’re going to be looking for in terms of how the city operates the airport there.” He encouraged airport users to talk to the city about prices and their needs because the city now has an incentive to operate the airport because it must remain open until the end of 2028. Decades of litigation settled The city and the FAA have engaged in litigation for more than three decades regarding the airport’s future, Huerta noted. The litigation surrounded two types of contracts the city of Santa Monica and the federal government had entered. One was a difference of views between the two entities as to when the contractual obligations for operating an airport after accepting federal funding expired. Federal grant assurances require that airports remain open and operating for 20 years after funds have been granted. The city of Santa Monica had received federal Airport Improvement Program funds in 1994 and then additional funds through an amendment to that grant in 2003. The point being contended was whether the 20-year period expired in 2014 or if it would remain in effect until 2023. The other point of litigation regarded whether the airport must be operated in perpetuity and is related to two contracts at the end of the 1940s, when the federal government stopped using the airport for military purposes after World War II. The city and the FAA had been in negotiation since 2016, Huerta said, when the ninth Circuit Court of Appeals https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2016/may/17/appeals-court-reverses-dismissal-in-smo-case a district court’s decision granting the FAA’s appeal to dismiss Santa Monica’s continued bids to close the airport. That unfavorable ruling for the federal government helped spur the agency to open discussions with the city. Huerta said the parties had to negotiate the city’s rights to its land and the aeronautical obligations to the government while providing a level of certainty and extended operations for tenants at the airport. “Land use is a local responsibility,” Huerta explained. “The FAA’s interest in this case and in dealing with any city or any state is really more a contractual matter. Are they complying with contracts they have entered into with the federal government?” Contractual compliance with grant assurances had been the FAA’s interest when it issued a cease-and-desist order late last year after the city of Santa Monica issued eviction notices to Atlantic Aviation and American Flyers. The settlement agreement resolves all pending disputes between the city and the FAA. Settlement does not set a precedent With many airport operators and the entire general aviation community following the Santa Monica case to determine what any decisions could mean for airports elsewhere, the settlement does not set a precedent, according to Huerta. “It is an incredibly complicated situation, a very unique set of facts that relate to Santa Monica,” Huerta said. Because of the settlement, the courts never ruled regarding federal surplus property being returned to cities, he said. Huerta also explained that the length of grant assurance obligations was never a question; Huerta clarified that the lawsuits over the grant assurances were based on a difference in opinion of the expiration date, not on the length of the obligations in general. He also said the agency would continue to ensure that airport operators comply with the contractual agreements they commit to when accepting federal funding. “I don’t think it sets any precedent,” Huerta said. ================================================= ================================ https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/...deal-protested Santa Monica discord continues Next steps remain in question February 7, 2017 By Jim Moore The court-approved FAA settlement with the city of Santa Monica, California, over the future of its municipal airport was negotiated in secrecy, and the terms sparked anger and surprise from both airport supporters and airport opponents when the deal became public. As both sides look to the future, much remains in question. AOPA photo by Mike Fizer. AOPA has been in the thick of the decades-long battle over the airport, and will continue to work to extend the life of Santa Monica Municipal Airport beyond Dec. 31, 2028, AOPA President Mark Baker said soon after the surprise settlement became public. Protesters and local officials who gathered Feb. 4 at the Santa Monica Business Park to voice outrage over the agreement decried the fact that the city is now forced to keep the airport open for at least 12 more years. The city council narrowly approved the settlement by a 4-to-3 vote. Meanwhile, AOPA and other airport advocates have clear goals and objectives for the next 12 years—chief among those is to change local attitudes and views and educate the community about the value of the local resource. FAA Administrator Michael Huerta, in an interview with AOPA, said the city is obligated under the agreement to allow tenants to provide aviation services, or may, as other municipal airport operators do, provide services (including aviation fuel) itself. “We’re really looking to them to work in good faith with the users of the airport, to work in good faith with us,” Huerta said, referring to city officials and adding that “based on the conversations that we have had, I’m feeling pretty good that they will.” Mayor Ted Winterer, who voted with the majority to approve the settlement, spoke openly days later about exploiting loopholes, the Santa Monica Daily Press reported in its account of the Feb. 4 anti-airport rally. “We will, in six months, shorten that runway to 3,500 feet,” Winterer said, according to the newspaper, and added that the city believes the shorter runway will reduce air traffic by 44 percent. “Winterer went so far as to say the City will exploit every loophole available to reduce air traffic,” the local paper reported. Santa Monica Airport Association President Christian Fry told AOPA that he also attended that Feb. 4 rally, and that city officials openly discussed what Fry considers “draconian” measures to reduce airport use, including “security inspections” of every aircraft, and installation of Plexiglas barriers between observation and aircraft movement areas to discourage airplane watching. “They’re saying things, even just a couple of days ago, that are pretty inflammatory in my opinion,” Fry said. He said the local airport advocacy group continues to consult with attorneys and with advocacy groups including AOPA and the National Business Aviation Association, and has not yet decided on next steps. “We’re really trying to evaluate all of the options,” Fry said, adding that those will likely include renewed efforts to build public support for the airport’s long-term existence. Huerta said the city must present a detailed plan for FAA approval before shortening the runway to 3,500 feet (as the settlement allows). Huerta said the FAA will review the runway (de)construction plan in detail with an eye on several factors, including safety and the impact on local airspace users. Santa Monica Municipal Airport has long been a reliever for Los Angeles International Airport, located just eight miles away, and the impact of curtailing Santa Monica airport use will be among the considerations before the FAA approves any changes to the layout. “That’s something we’ll need to evaluate based on what their specific plan looks like,” Huerta told AOPA. Santa Monica Municipal Airport has throughout its long history been an asset to the local economy, creating or supporting tens of thousands of jobs over the decades, as well as generating tax revenues, local economic activity, and other benefits for the community such as its availability to provide critical transportation links in the event of a natural disaster. The settlement agreement has already begun to curtail economic activity: JetSuiteX had planned to begin operating low-cost charter flights out of Santa Monica this month, and placed those plans on indefinite hold soon after the settlement was announced. “We apologize to our clients, over half of whom are Santa Monica residents, who have been adversely affected by the unprecedented recent events concerning SMO airport,” CEO Alex Wilcox said in a statement issued by the company. The company had sold about 1,000 tickets since announcing the planned flights in December, and Wilcox said those customers would all receive full refunds. Fry said the Santa Monica Airport Association was among the many taken by surprise as the FAA settlement was announced, having been privy to none of its details, or even the existence of negotiations. “We’re certainly not happy at all about the shortening of the runway,” Fry said, noting that such a move would limit the airport's utility. “We’re also concerned about the safety implications of a shorter runway.” Fry said the airport is much like an interstate highway that traverses the city, in that the airport, while physically located in the city, serves as an access point to the national transportation infrastructure. “That on-ramp and off-ramp to the airspace system is part of the national infrastructure, and I believe should be protected on a national level,” Fry said. He remains hopeful that six more election cycles will yield new attitudes from city government about the airport’s value to the community. Huerta said the FAA will hold the city to its obligations to provide services and operate the airport. “Reasonable and customary business practices are going to be what we are going to be looking for,” Huerta said. “We’re going to be quite vigilant to ensure that the terms of the agreement are adhered to.” |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
NBAA Challenges Santa Monica Deal (Was: Santa Monica discord continues)
On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 1:20:00 PM UTC-6, Larry Dighera wrote:
In this exercise at Santa Monica, the DART volunteers simulated an earthquake that has closed the 405 and 10 Freeways, and the Pacific Coast Highway. In the scenario, SMO’s runway could be damaged, but still usable. Together, the 10 planes involved in the scenario could carry over 2,000 pounds of supplies into SMO, and if needed, could fly five missions per day, getting critical supplies to Red Cross volunteers on the ground, as well as the hospitals they serve. WOW, a whole FIVE missions in some cock-a-mammy scenario where the runway survives but the freeways are closed. Note that LAX, the big airport, could handle FIVE, FIFTY or FIVE Hundred flights under this ditzy scheme. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
NBAA Challenges Santa Monica Deal
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
NBAA Challenges Santa Monica Deal
NBAA Pursues Court Challenge To SMO Closure http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...3607-full.html NBAA filed a motion in a federal appeals court on Monday seeking a stop to any actions that would affect aviation operations at Santa Monica Airport, while the matter is under judicial review. The FAA and the city have announced plans to close the airport in 2028 and to immediately reduce the length of the sole runway from 4,973 feet to 3,500 feet. NBAA and others asked the appeals court last month to review the legality of that settlement. The new motion responds to a request by the FAA to dismiss that petition. On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:21:48 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 8:46:04 PM UTC-6, wrote: wrote: On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 1:20:00 PM UTC-6, Larry Dighera wrote: In this exercise at Santa Monica, the DART volunteers simulated an earthquake that has closed the 405 and 10 Freeways, and the Pacific Coast Highway. In the scenario, SMO’s runway could be damaged, but still usable. Together, the 10 planes involved in the scenario could carry over 2,000 pounds of supplies into SMO, and if needed, could fly five missions per day, getting critical supplies to Red Cross volunteers on the ground, as well as the hospitals they serve. WOW, a whole FIVE missions in some cock-a-mammy scenario where the runway survives but the freeways are closed. Note that LAX, the big airport, could handle FIVE, FIFTY or FIVE Hundred flights under this ditzy scheme. Runways don't have overpasses, underpasses, or bridges over them, which are what usually closes a freeway. LAX is a long way from SMO. It looks like 8 miles, fence line to fence line. "Long" if you have to walk. How would you get from LAX to SMO with no freeways? Surface streets: CA-1, Centinela, Sepulveda, Culver, etc. Plus with my plan the SMO runway would become an extension of National Blvd. so the pavement would still be there. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Join us to help save Santa Monica Airport! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 8 | September 13th 14 04:30 PM |
Judge Dismisses Santa Monica Suit | Orval Fairbairn | Owning | 0 | February 17th 14 12:52 AM |
Santa Monica Showdown: City v FAA | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 23 | May 16th 08 11:01 PM |
Santa Monica Airport Bans Jet Traffic | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 22 | April 7th 08 10:52 PM |
Santa Monica (KSMO) Tips or Gotchas? | Hamish Reid | Piloting | 9 | July 12th 05 11:51 PM |