If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ntsb report
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:31:09 -0500, Peter Clark
wrote: http://www.ntsb.gov/O_n_O/docs/AVIATION/3935.PDF That's the one. Many thanks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
You do realize that you have posted this gentleman's name and social
security number on the Internet in violation of federal law? "Peter Clark" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:33:36 GMT, wrote: Does anyone have a copy of the NTSB report which was posted a while back concerning the guy who launched IFR in IMC in uncontrolled airspace into VMC above and was dinged for "careless and negligent"? http://www.ntsb.gov/O_n_O/docs/AVIATION/3935.PDF ? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
You might want to call the NTSB and let them know their offense.. They
are the ones who would be in violation of any such statute, not a separate individual who posts a LINK to said page. Dave OtisWinslow wrote: You do realize that you have posted this gentleman's name and social security number on the Internet in violation of federal law? "Peter Clark" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:33:36 GMT, wrote: Does anyone have a copy of the NTSB report which was posted a while back concerning the guy who launched IFR in IMC in uncontrolled airspace into VMC above and was dinged for "careless and negligent"? http://www.ntsb.gov/O_n_O/docs/AVIATION/3935.PDF ? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Let's be honest about the facts.
According to the report, he launched into IMC without a release. That's a NO-NO! wrote: Does anyone have a copy of the NTSB report which was posted a while back concerning the guy who launched IFR in IMC in uncontrolled airspace into VMC above and was dinged for "careless and negligent"? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
OtisWinslow wrote:
You do realize that you have posted this gentleman's name and social security number on the Internet in violation of federal law? Are you refering to the Personal Privacy Act (IIRC 5USC550(b))? If so, this regulates organizations which MAINTAIN A DATABASE containing personal information. The poster didn't violate it and it's not clear that publishing individual records from such a database does. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Gee, I don't see any name or ssn.
I see a URL where his name and ss might exist, and if it does, it was put there by the same federal government that forbids it. Of course, it relates to a situation where a pilot closely followed a federal regulation and was busted for doing so, so maybe we are all simply rattling around in the same rabbit hole. On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:28:15 GMT, "OtisWinslow" wrote: You do realize that you have posted this gentleman's name and social security number on the Internet in violation of federal law? "Peter Clark" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:33:36 GMT, wrote: Does anyone have a copy of the NTSB report which was posted a while back concerning the guy who launched IFR in IMC in uncontrolled airspace into VMC above and was dinged for "careless and negligent"? http://www.ntsb.gov/O_n_O/docs/AVIATION/3935.PDF ? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
You are wrong - it is NOT a no-no.
The NTSB report acknowledges as such. He was held in violation of the catch-all "careless and negligent", which only exists so that the FAA can bust pilots when they haven't really violated a regulation. On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:52:35 GMT, jsmith wrote: Let's be honest about the facts. According to the report, he launched into IMC without a release. That's a NO-NO! wrote: Does anyone have a copy of the NTSB report which was posted a while back concerning the guy who launched IFR in IMC in uncontrolled airspace into VMC above and was dinged for "careless and negligent"? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Can someone explain to me why wasn't he granted the clearance into
KIND? Was it because of traffic flow or because of the weather at KIND? According to the decision it was both, but I was unaware that ATC wouldn't grant you a clearance if the destination field was below minimums as a part 91 flight. Obviously you'd still need fuel on board to comply with an alternate minimums, etc. As a part 91 flight he could still attempt to execute the approach if the field was below minimums, while air carrier flights wouldn't have been able to, correct? I'm not asking about the intelligence of doing such things, obviously, but rather the mechanisms for ATC to deny you a clearance. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Looking for a See and Avoid NTSB report | Ace Pilot | Piloting | 2 | June 10th 04 01:01 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
Senator asks Navy for report on pilot | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | July 17th 03 10:08 PM |