If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
compass turns with high mounted compass (Cessna 152)
I'm just starting out my instrument training in a Cessna 152 that has a
compass mounted at the top of the windshield. Here's a sample picture for those who have never seen it, http://www.airliners.net/open.file/643201/M Can anyone tell me if it's still possible to do compass turns under the hood with this kind of setup? I've seen a lot of planes with high mounted compasses, so I imagine this isn't a new question. - Ray |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Ray,
It depends on you. Next time you are in the plane with a hood (or substitute) on see if you can see the compass. That should answer your question. Most people can manage that. Daniel "Ray" wrote in message ... I'm just starting out my instrument training in a Cessna 152 that has a compass mounted at the top of the windshield. Here's a sample picture for those who have never seen it, http://www.airliners.net/open.file/643201/M Can anyone tell me if it's still possible to do compass turns under the hood with this kind of setup? I've seen a lot of planes with high mounted compasses, so I imagine this isn't a new question. - Ray |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I think the problem is that, with a high-mounted compass, you are
looking out the window every time you look at the compass. I'm not sure how examiners deal with this. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On 1 Apr 2005 06:26:48 -0800, "paul kgyy" wrote:
I think the problem is that, with a high-mounted compass, you are looking out the window every time you look at the compass. I'm not sure how examiners deal with this. Some examiners don't care. Others will just tell you your compass heading whenever you ask for it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Well, if you do timed turns and forget all the other nonsense, you
only need to know the heading when the aircraft is straight and level. Looking at a bouncing compass during a turn in the clouds and burning up a bunch of brain cycles at the same time figuring leads and lags and accelerations and decelerations with your attention diverted from the instrument panel, is asking for trouble, if you ask me. When your eyes return to the panel, you will probably find the altitude decreasing rapidly and your airseed increasing rapidly, and then you get to do partial panel unusual attitude recovery for real. By this time ATC is probably on your case about your altitude, and you are wishing you were somewhere else. How about instead (1) look at the compass and note your heading (2) use a compass rose (10 seconds per number on the rose) to calculate the time for your desired turn (4) concentrate on a nice smooth, level turn (5) check your heading after the rollout and (6) tidy up the error, if any. Not nearly as gee-whiz as all the compass gobbledygook, but a whole lot safer, if you ask me. On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 14:06:30 -0600, Ben Jackson wrote: On 2005-04-01, wrote: Some examiners don't care. Others will just tell you your compass heading whenever you ask for it. I always thought that was funny, since the hardest thing for me about the mag compass is reading it. When I practiced compass turns I did it by looking at the mag compass, even though I could see outside. The skill I was trying to learn wasn't attitude instrument flying at that point. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Compass turns are not required by the PTS. In my opinion, teaching and
practicing compass turns is a complete waste of time that could be more profitably spent on more practical maneuvers. OTOH, timed turns make perfectly good sense. Imagine that you are an instrument-rated pilot flying on a dark and stormy night. Your vacuum pump fails (or your vacuum-operated attitude indicator/heading indicator fails). Your wife is scared, your kids are crying, the turbulence is moderate to extreme, and you are trying to remember whether to lag or lead the rollout by...the latitude? One-half the latitude? Can't remember, and the situation is not getting any better. Compare that with simply rolling into a standard rate turn (still hard to maintain in turbulence) and watching the seconds tick by. BTW, nobody expects you to roll out anywhere close to a desired heading when conditions are really bad. Bob Gardner "paul kgyy" wrote in message oups.com... I think the problem is that, with a high-mounted compass, you are looking out the window every time you look at the compass. I'm not sure how examiners deal with this. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Compass turns are not required by the PTS. In my opinion, teaching and
practicing compass turns is a complete waste of time that could be more profitably spent on more practical maneuvers. OTOH, timed turns make perfectly good sense.... Compare that with simply rolling into a standard rate turn (still hard to maintain in turbulence) and watching the seconds tick by. BTW, nobody expects you to roll out anywhere close to a desired heading when conditions are really bad. Yes, compass turns are not in the new PTS. However, I think that it's still a skill worth learning. I prefer (and teach) using timing for small turns (heading change 60 degrees or less), and the compass for larger turns. All you really need to remember is that if the desired heading is north, you roll out early, and if the desired heading is south, you go past it before rolling out. This gets you close, and then you used a small timed turn to get closer. I really think this is easier than trying to figure out the time required for say, a right turn from 320 to 180. There's also the effect of the turn coordinator calibration. But I wouldn't insist on compass turns if the pilot makes acceptable timed turns. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I still think you are wasting your time and that of your students. Compass
turns are not practical...that's why they haven't been in the PTS for a long time; it's not just a change in the most recent PTS. Turn coordinator calibration is a non-issue, except for CFII checkrides. So you aim for 270 and end up with 250...is this life-threatening? Easy to fix, and absolutely no one will notice. Anyone who cannot pick two headings off of the heading indicator, count the number of ten-degree/45-degree tick marks between them, and divide by three may not be intellectually suited to aviation. Bob "Barry" wrote in message ... Compass turns are not required by the PTS. In my opinion, teaching and practicing compass turns is a complete waste of time that could be more profitably spent on more practical maneuvers. OTOH, timed turns make perfectly good sense.... Compare that with simply rolling into a standard rate turn (still hard to maintain in turbulence) and watching the seconds tick by. BTW, nobody expects you to roll out anywhere close to a desired heading when conditions are really bad. Yes, compass turns are not in the new PTS. However, I think that it's still a skill worth learning. I prefer (and teach) using timing for small turns (heading change 60 degrees or less), and the compass for larger turns. All you really need to remember is that if the desired heading is north, you roll out early, and if the desired heading is south, you go past it before rolling out. This gets you close, and then you used a small timed turn to get closer. I really think this is easier than trying to figure out the time required for say, a right turn from 320 to 180. There's also the effect of the turn coordinator calibration. But I wouldn't insist on compass turns if the pilot makes acceptable timed turns. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I think the problem is that, with a high-mounted compass, you are
looking out the window every time you look at the compass. I'm not sure how examiners deal with this. From the Instrument Rating PTS: Applicants may have an unfair advantage during performance of the TASK using the backup flight instruments during an instrument approach due to the location of the magnetic compass in some aircraft. When crosschecking the magnetic compass heading, a view of the runway or other visual clue may be sighted. It is the examiner's responsibility to determine if the applicant is receiving visual clues from outside the cockpit. If an examiner feels that the applicant is receiving visual clues, the examiner may devise other options to limit the applicant's view. By no means shall the examiner limit his or her view as the safety pilot. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 07:28 PM |
How high can you fly a Cessna 172? | Victor | Piloting | 11 | April 10th 04 10:24 PM |
Strange compass behavior | me | Owning | 10 | February 14th 04 04:24 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
High CHTs on Cessna 175 | Ron Natalie | Owning | 2 | September 9th 03 02:14 AM |