If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
CNX-80 "discontinuity"
When you put a flight plan into the CNX-80, you end up with a
"discontinuity" before the last fix. My habit is to delete the discontinuity as soon as I finish entering the route. Another instructor in my club teaches that you should NOT delete the discontinuity. I can't see any strong arguments one way or the other. Leaving it in doesn't seem to hurt anything (except that you get a warning when you finally arrive at your destination). Taking it out doesn't seem to hurt anything either. Can anybody think of any real reason to either insist that it be deleted or insist that it NOT be deleted? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Roy Smith" wrote in message =
... When you put a flight plan into the CNX-80, you end up with a=20 "discontinuity" before the last fix. My habit is to delete the=20 discontinuity as soon as I finish entering the route. Another=20 instructor in my club teaches that you should NOT delete the=20 discontinuity. =20 I can't see any strong arguments one way or the other. Leaving it in=20 doesn't seem to hurt anything (except that you get a warning when you=20 finally arrive at your destination). Taking it out doesn't seem to = hurt=20 anything either. =20 Can anybody think of any real reason to either insist that it be = deleted=20 or insist that it NOT be deleted? I always delete the discontinuity so as to have a complete flight plan. Otherwise, the CNX 80 enters Suspend Mode at the discontinuity. To me, that's a strong argument for removing the discontinuity. I'd be interested in hearing the other guy's reasons for retaining it. Of course, the discontinuity will disappear automatically if an approach is selected at the destination, but I don't see that as a reason to leave the discontinuity in place. In case of a visual approach, I normally want navigation to the airport. ---JRC--- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Stop thinking of the CNX 80 as a moving map GPS but as an FMS. Then keep
the discontinuity in until you have received the ATIS update as to active approaches and runways. This makes selecting an approach easier as you use the existing FPL and do not have to extensively modify the current one. Last month a pilot at my airport replaced a new CNX 80 with a GNS 430. His needs were to fly "direct" and not use airways in his flight planning. He was comfortable with a more popular and "intuitive" unit. He was unhappy that the compromise involved giving up GPSS roll steering with his autopilot. "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... When you put a flight plan into the CNX-80, you end up with a "discontinuity" before the last fix. My habit is to delete the discontinuity as soon as I finish entering the route. Another instructor in my club teaches that you should NOT delete the discontinuity. I can't see any strong arguments one way or the other. Leaving it in doesn't seem to hurt anything (except that you get a warning when you finally arrive at your destination). Taking it out doesn't seem to hurt anything either. Can anybody think of any real reason to either insist that it be deleted or insist that it NOT be deleted? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Steven DalPra" wrote: Stop thinking of the CNX 80 as a moving map GPS but as an FMS. Then keep the discontinuity in until you have received the ATIS update as to active approaches and runways. This makes selecting an approach easier as you use the existing FPL and do not have to extensively modify the current one. Why is it easier to enter an approach if you leave the discontinuity in? In either case, you need to hit PROC (possibly having to hit FN first, if the PROC softkey is not showing), select the approach, select the IAF (or Vectors), hit EXEC, and then hit ENTER to confirm over-writing the active flight plan. I hope I got all that right :-) How does this process change if you leave the discontinuity in or take it out? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Steven DalPra wrote: Last month a pilot at my airport replaced a new CNX 80 with a GNS 430. His needs were to fly "direct" and not use airways in his flight planning. He was comfortable with a more popular and "intuitive" unit. He was unhappy that the compromise involved giving up GPSS roll steering with his autopilot. The CNX80 has GPSS roll steering included? Maik |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
It has the ability to accept roll steering from a capable autopilot. Talk
to your avionics tech for details. Also, their is an add-on for analog autopilots to allow them to accept from some older units. "Maik" wrote in message ... Steven DalPra wrote: Last month a pilot at my airport replaced a new CNX 80 with a GNS 430. His needs were to fly "direct" and not use airways in his flight planning. He was comfortable with a more popular and "intuitive" unit. He was unhappy that the compromise involved giving up GPSS roll steering with his autopilot. The CNX80 has GPSS roll steering included? Maik |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Hmm... until now the only autopilot with GPSS I found are from S-TEC.
Also the extra GPSS box from S-TEC is only for S-TEC autopilots... at least it is only aloud with S-TEC :-) Do you have a link, name or partnumber so I could search for and read a bit more...? And normally the GPS is controlling the GPSS and not the vice versa. Are you sure? Maik Steven DalPra wrote: It has the ability to accept roll steering from a capable autopilot. Talk to your avionics tech for details. Also, their is an add-on for analog autopilots to allow them to accept from some older units. "Maik" wrote in message ... Steven DalPra wrote: Last month a pilot at my airport replaced a new CNX 80 with a GNS 430. His needs were to fly "direct" and not use airways in his flight planning. He was comfortable with a more popular and "intuitive" unit. He was unhappy that the compromise involved giving up GPSS roll steering with his autopilot. The CNX80 has GPSS roll steering included? Maik |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:16:56 +0200, Maik wrote:
Hmm... until now the only autopilot with GPSS I found are from S-TEC. Also the extra GPSS box from S-TEC is only for S-TEC autopilots... at least it is only aloud with S-TEC :-) The newer Bendix KLN94 (the ones with the part number ending in -0102) have GPSS out to the KAP140 autopilot. Do you have a link, name or partnumber so I could search for and read a bit more...? And normally the GPS is controlling the GPSS and not the vice versa. Are you sure? At least on the King ones that's the way I understand it to work - GPSS sends out roll commands which the autopilot acts on. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What is GPSS?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Take a look at the publications from S-Tec
http://www.s-tec.com/prodbrochures.html maik john smith wrote: What is GPSS? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|