"V-22 squadron achieves successin Iraq, USMC says"

"Vince" wrote in message
. ..
redc1c4 wrote:


i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in
Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you did
that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.

then repeat them

please show how no outposts in Iraq are suppleid only by air

It's been a few years since my last logic course, but I'm pretty sure that
"all ammunition supply in Iraq is transported by air" and "no outposts in
Iraq are supplied only be air" are not even close to being the same
statement.

Glenn D.

Glenn Dowdy wrote:
"Vince" wrote in message
. ..
redc1c4 wrote:

i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in
Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you did
that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.
then repeat them

please show how no outposts in Iraq are suppleid only by air

It's been a few years since my last logic course, but I'm pretty sure that
"all ammunition supply in Iraq is transported by air" and "no outposts in
Iraq are supplied only be air" are not even close to being the same
statement.

Glenn D.


feel free to quote a post where I made any such comment


Vince

"Vince" wrote in message
. ..
Glenn Dowdy wrote:
"Vince" wrote in message
. ..
redc1c4 wrote:

i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in
Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you
did that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.
then repeat them

please show how no outposts in Iraq are suppleid only by air

It's been a few years since my last logic course, but I'm pretty sure
that "all ammunition supply in Iraq is transported by air" and "no
outposts in Iraq are supplied only be air" are not even close to being
the same statement.

Glenn D.
feel free to quote a post where I made any such comment


Please post where I made that claim. Reading comprehension lagging today?

Glenn D.

Glenn Dowdy wrote:
"Vince" wrote in message
. ..
Glenn Dowdy wrote:
"Vince" wrote in message
. ..
redc1c4 wrote:
i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in
Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you
did that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.
then repeat them

please show how no outposts in Iraq are suppleid only by air

It's been a few years since my last logic course, but I'm pretty sure
that "all ammunition supply in Iraq is transported by air" and "no
outposts in Iraq are supplied only be air" are not even close to being
the same statement.

Glenn D.
feel free to quote a post where I made any such comment


Please post where I made that claim. Reading comprehension lagging today?

Glenn D.


no I was very clear. I made no claim for you
check your glasses

Vince

On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:02:45 -0500, Vince wrote:

Colin Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:52:26 -0500, Vince wrote:


do you need another block of instruction on logistics?

I got irelevant bull**** claims

Logistics has been a subject of military study since Marius. I've
studied French German and US systems evolved since the 1860s.

I call BS.

If you had studied military logistics you would have noticed when me
and red began making fun of you.


I noticed and ignored you making a fool of yourself

BS

If you had noticed you would have not repeated the same comment we
were laughing at you about.

You said something dumb - then myself and red started making fun of
you by - using standardized logistics terminology that you did not
understand.




In fact every one of your posts did nothing but drive home the point
that you do not have the first clue about logistics.


more personal abuse from the persons with no facts

We gave you lots of facts in the discussion. You were just to dumb to
learn anything.


--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.

On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:28:54 -0800, redc1c4
wrote:


i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you did that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.

The most amusing thing was that the claimed to know how ammunition is
moved - but did not even catch on to the term 'Class V.'



--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.

"Colin Campbell" (remove underscore) wrote in
message ...

You said something dumb - then myself and red started making fun of
you by - using standardized logistics terminology that you did not
understand.



Well, Vince, if nothing else, you can bust Colin on very bad grammar ...

- nilita

Colin Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:02:45 -0500, Vince wrote:

Colin Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:52:26 -0500, Vince wrote:


do you need another block of instruction on logistics?
I got irelevant bull**** claims

Logistics has been a subject of military study since Marius. I've
studied French German and US systems evolved since the 1860s.
I call BS.

If you had studied military logistics you would have noticed when me
and red began making fun of you.

I noticed and ignored you making a fool of yourself

BS

If you had noticed you would have not repeated the same comment we
were laughing at you about.

You said something dumb - then myself and red started making fun of
you by - using standardized logistics terminology that you did not
understand.



In fact every one of your posts did nothing but drive home the point
that you do not have the first clue about logistics.

more personal abuse from the persons with no facts

We gave you lots of facts in the discussion. You were just to dumb to
learn anything.



more abuse without cites or facts or even quotes

I served on PhD examining committees on Military logistics with Mancur
Olsen, Author of "The economics of the Wartime shortage"

your abuse simply confirms your ignorance


Vince

Colin Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:28:54 -0800, redc1c4
wrote:


i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you did that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.

The most amusing thing was that the claimed to know how ammunition is
moved - but did not even catch on to the term 'Class V.'

OFCS

You are simply adding to the demonstration of ignorance

"Class V" is a question of supply not logistics

http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...63-2-1/Ch8.htm

"The Oxford English dictionary defines logistics as: “The branch of
military science having to do with procuring, maintaining and
transporting material, personnel and facilities.”Another dictionary
definition is: "The time related positioning of resources." As such,
logistics is commonly seen as a branch of engineering which creates
"people systems" rather than "machine systems""


Logistics decides inter alia what type of supply system you can organize


Sheesh

Vince

La N wrote:
"Colin Campbell" (remove underscore) wrote in
message ...

You said something dumb - then myself and red started making fun of
you by - using standardized logistics terminology that you did not
understand.



Well, Vince, if nothing else, you can bust Colin on very bad grammar ...

- nilita



he does not know the difference between supply and logistics so the case
is closed


Vince