"V-22 squadron achieves successin Iraq, USMC says"

"Vince" wrote in message
news
La N wrote:
"Colin Campbell" (remove underscore) wrote in
message ...

You said something dumb - then myself and red started making fun of
you by - using standardized logistics terminology that you did not
understand.



Well, Vince, if nothing else, you can bust Colin on very bad grammar ...


- nilita

he does not know the difference between supply and logistics so the case
is closed


Well, it has been an "interesting" debate between 2 people, each of whom has
never been known to admit when they have been wrong ...%)

- nilita

On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:42:51 GMT, "La N"
wrote:


"Vince" wrote in message
news
La N wrote:
"Colin Campbell" (remove underscore) wrote in
message ...

You said something dumb - then myself and red started making fun of
you by - using standardized logistics terminology that you did not
understand.



Well, Vince, if nothing else, you can bust Colin on very bad grammar ...


- nilita

he does not know the difference between supply and logistics so the case
is closed


Well, it has been an "interesting" debate between 2 people, each of whom has
never been known to admit when they have been wrong ...%)

That is not a fair accusation when aimed at Vince.

Peter Skelton

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:42:51 GMT, "La N"
wrote:


"Vince" wrote in message
news
La N wrote:
"Colin Campbell" (remove underscore) wrote in
message ...

You said something dumb - then myself and red started making fun of
you by - using standardized logistics terminology that you did not
understand.



Well, Vince, if nothing else, you can bust Colin on very bad grammar
...


- nilita

he does not know the difference between supply and logistics so the case
is closed


Well, it has been an "interesting" debate between 2 people, each of whom
has
never been known to admit when they have been wrong ...%)

That is not a fair accusation when aimed at Vince.


Well, maybe it's because he's never been wrong? ..

He has never declared himself to be at the losing end of an argument, so I
guess, then, that Vince is always right? I like Vince, but he *does* - like
so many people - have an ego that prevents him from saying something to the
effect of, "Okay, we'll just have to agree to disagree on that." He is
always right, and the other person is always wrong.

- nilita

On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:24:55 GMT, "La N"
wrote:


"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:42:51 GMT, "La N"
wrote:


"Vince" wrote in message
news La N wrote:
"Colin Campbell" (remove underscore) wrote in
message ...

You said something dumb - then myself and red started making fun of
you by - using standardized logistics terminology that you did not
understand.



Well, Vince, if nothing else, you can bust Colin on very bad grammar
...


- nilita

he does not know the difference between supply and logistics so the case
is closed


Well, it has been an "interesting" debate between 2 people, each of whom
has
never been known to admit when they have been wrong ...%)

That is not a fair accusation when aimed at Vince.


Well, maybe it's because he's never been wrong? ..

He has never declared himself to be at the losing end of an argument, so I
guess, then, that Vince is always right?

That is simply not true. Like most, he simply abandons a point
when he yeilds it. Pragmatically speaking, it's the best thing to
do.


Peter Skelton

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:24:55 GMT, "La N"
wrote:


"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:42:51 GMT, "La N"
wrote:


"Vince" wrote in message
newsKGdnflXQp7fKjDanZ2dnUVZ_ovinZ2d@comcast. com...
La N wrote:
"Colin Campbell" (remove underscore) wrote
in
message ...

You said something dumb - then myself and red started making fun of
you by - using standardized logistics terminology that you did not
understand.



Well, Vince, if nothing else, you can bust Colin on very bad grammar
...


- nilita

he does not know the difference between supply and logistics so the
case
is closed


Well, it has been an "interesting" debate between 2 people, each of whom
has
never been known to admit when they have been wrong ...%)

That is not a fair accusation when aimed at Vince.


Well, maybe it's because he's never been wrong? ..

He has never declared himself to be at the losing end of an argument, so I
guess, then, that Vince is always right?

That is simply not true. Like most, he simply abandons a point
when he yeilds it. Pragmatically speaking, it's the best thing to
do.

Oh, I see ... whatever you say ....

- nilita

La N wrote:
"Vince" wrote in message
news
La N wrote:
"Colin Campbell" (remove underscore) wrote in
message ...

You said something dumb - then myself and red started making fun of
you by - using standardized logistics terminology that you did not
understand.


Well, Vince, if nothing else, you can bust Colin on very bad grammar ...


- nilita
he does not know the difference between supply and logistics so the case
is closed


Well, it has been an "interesting" debate between 2 people, each of whom has
never been known to admit when they have been wrong ...%)

- nilita



I have often been wrong.

I trusted George Bush that he would not pervert the intelligence
community to take this nation to war.

I was wrong


Vince

La N wrote:
"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:42:51 GMT, "La N"
wrote:

"Vince" wrote in message
news La N wrote:
"Colin Campbell" (remove
underscore) wrote in message
...

You said something dumb - then myself and red started
making fun of you by - using standardized logistics
terminology that you did not understand.


Well, Vince, if nothing else, you can bust Colin on very bad
grammar ...

- nilita
he does not know the difference between supply and logistics so
the case is closed

Well, it has been an "interesting" debate between 2 people, each
of whom has never been known to admit when they have been wrong
...%)

That is not a fair accusation when aimed at Vince.


Well, maybe it's because he's never been wrong? ..

He has never declared himself to be at the losing end of an argument,
so I guess, then, that Vince is always right? I like Vince, but he
*does* - like so many people - have an ego that prevents him from
saying something to the effect of, "Okay, we'll just have to agree to
disagree on that." He is always right, and the other person is
always wrong.

- nilita


I am often wrong. I can't spell and my "than and then" is shaky.
On inferences I am always willing to agree to disagree

In my syllabus it states

"Participation points are not given for merely answering questions.
Participation points are awarded for special contribution to
discussions, especially sticking your neck out to argue the logic of a
class topic with me. Pointing out a significant error in my logic or
facts gets extra credit."

My engineers delight in catching me in a technical error
They get credit for it.


Vince















..

On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 09:16:35 -0500, Vince wrote:

Colin Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:28:54 -0800, redc1c4
wrote:


i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you did that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.

The most amusing thing was that the claimed to know how ammunition is
moved - but did not even catch on to the term 'Class V.'

OFCS

You are simply adding to the demonstration of ignorance

"Class V" is a question of supply not logistics

ROTFL!

Thank you for demonstrating that you have no clue.

Do you really think that 'classes of supply' and the logistics of
moving them are separate issues?

Here is a clue for you (now you can say you have one):

The term 'priority of supply' is part of the logistics annex in an
Operations Order. Each supply category is given a priority and the
highest priorities are the focus of the logistics effort.

Here is another clue for you (now you can claim to have _two_ clues!):

Each class of supply has different movement priorities. For example:
toilet paper (a Class II item) would not be moved by air because it
tends to be a very low priority item.

Class III and V are high cube and mass items that are typically moved
on the ground. However - air movement is always planned for as a
contingency because of its criticality in fighting a battle.


Besides - you have still not explained why we should take your
uninformed opinion as to the effectiveness of the aircraft over that
of the people who actually fly it and maintain it.



--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.

On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 07:27:59 -0500, Vince wrote:


I served on PhD examining committees on Military logistics with Mancur
Olsen, Author of "The economics of the Wartime shortage"

So?

Your posts indicate that you have no understanding of how logistics
are handled in the _real world_.

If you had a clue you would not be providing so much entertainment for
myself and red - who have had to do this for real.


--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.

On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:14:20 -0500, Vince wrote:


I have often been wrong.

I trusted George Bush that he would not pervert the intelligence
community to take this nation to war.

I was wrong

So you were wrong about Clinton on this same issue also?


--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.