If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Buy it for $25K put $100K into it and you will have a $75K airplane.
Wow! Those numbers tell almost the exact story of my 1966 Turbo Aztec. The subject line of this story caught my eye because that's the amount of the first check we wrote for our plane (as "salvage - for parts only"). We've often said it would have still been a bad deal if we'd gotten it for nothing, but it's a great plane and I have a hard time imagining anything else working so well for our typical trips. If I saw a deal like this, I'd be inclined to work something out with the owner to get the plane through a decent annual inspection and into airworthiness before writing a check for it. I'd be happy to pay for the repairs (up to some limit) to be able to purchase a *flying* plane instead of just one with potential. If you have a mechanic friend and the plane is already in your backyard, it's a little different, but I wouldn't want to go through driving two hours each way to work on restoration again. Good luck. --kyler |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I never like to rain on someones parade just because they are new to the
game, but this airplane will be trouble... Your initial engine repair estimates are low by a factor of 3X just to get em running properly - and then only for a time, maybe a year or so... You are likely to then find that the engines will both need major overhauls... One already has the sickness, and as soon as you start using them, so will the other... Next, you may find that the props and hubs are out of limits.. Once that little overhaul is done, you will discover that the rpm wobble also involved the prop controllers, for a another thousand bucks or so... You likely will discover that the power pack needs an overhaul, where you will then discover that most of the hydraulic hoses need replacing... Not to mention that you need new seals on the gear cylinders, and that the pivot bushings are shot, causing you to drop the gear - where you will find or break some limit switches and wiring that needs replacing... And, while we are on hoses, how about the fuel lines, hmmm? And, you better get a look at the fuel bladders - probably gonna need some bucks thrown at them.. Now, lets get into the control surfaces... Most likely the pivot bushings are worn and the surfaces are sloppy and will need a rebuild... And, how are the cables and pulleys? And, while we are inside the fuselage how many AD's have not been done, hmmm? Don't tell me about the log book, have the mechanic go look.. There's gonna be some surprises on a ship that was not maintained in the first place Awww riiight, I'm only getting warmed up (I do speak Aztec) but I'm gonna stop beating on you here... I hope you get the picture, and that you get actual, real world, estimates before putting down one penny your paint estimate is out to lunch... If in the end the math adds up for you, then go for it... Me, I would look for a plane that was maintained that is in the $75K - $100K range, that I can fly away - and save myself a lot of grief and dollars in the end.. Denny "david" wrote in message ... I have a chance to buy a 63 aztec in rough condition. It would be my first plane. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Dennis O'Connor" wrote in message ... Next, you may find that the props and hubs are out of limits.. Right, I believe this things has the Hartzell X/V hub props on them. They're probably already unserviceable. Has the first inspection required by the AD from a few years back been done yet? This is done every 250 (or 500 hours). A large number of the props sent to Hartzell for the inspections get defiled by Hartzell as unserviceable. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
My initial reaction is first plane? save money? if you have to ask,
don't? Buy it if you WANT a project, otherwise no. It's more difficult to get work done on a plane than you think. Planes consume money, they don't save money. What about the down time while it gets repaired? Usually the running costs of an airplane swamp the purchase costs anyway, so saving money on purchase becomes a moot point. YOu will spend the purchase cost in 500 hours of flight running costs. Saving a little in purchase cost is very minor in the overall long term scheme of things. Planning on scotching on running maintenance too? If you have the money, buy a plane in the absolute BEST running condition with the avionics and options YOU WANT and will be satisfied with. If you want to save a little money, but a hail damaged plane, they fly just fine and are 10k less. Also, if you want to save money, ramp it, not hangar it. Also, if you want to save money, buy liability insurance only and BE CAREFUL. But don't buy a project to save money. They don't. david wrote in message ... I have a chance to buy a 63 aztec in rough condition. It would be my first plane. Engines have 1200 smoh but one has a cracked cylinder. (estimated repair, $5000?) Paint is poor. ($5000 estimate?) Interior is poor ($5000 estimate?). Brand new props. Only 1 nav/com. older avionics. Auto pilot broken. It was used as a survey aircraft and has a certified hole cut. I could potentially use it for aerial work as my company subs about $50,000 in photography per year (5 jobs). I have a good pilot to split costs with. He has the commercial rating and would fly while working. Insurance would be $10,000 for the commercial type. I am a bit concerned about the $80/ hour fuel burn and the potential for gremlins on an older not so well maintained airplane. The price seems very reasonable which is the main motivation for buying. 25,000+5000+5000+5000= $40,000 for a aztec with new props, survey hole, new paint and interior. Am I missing something? Is this a good deal? Most of the similar year planes I have seen are about $80,000. My buddy is an avionics repaiman and would thoroughly check the plane prior to the purchase. Could it be resold at a profit if I needed to? Please give any advice as I don't want to make a big mistake. Thanks in advance. David *** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com *** Add a newsgroup interface to your website today. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
david wrote: I have a chance to buy a 63 aztec in rough condition. It would be my first plane. Engines have 1200 smoh but one has a cracked cylinder. (estimated repair, $5000?) $15K times two, as surely the other one is worthless. Paint is poor. ($5000 estimate?) About $10K to paint an Aztec, although this could wait. Interior is poor ($5000 estimate?). That's about right and will get you leather and all new plastic, carpet, headliner, etc. Brand new props. Only 1 nav/com. older avionics. $5K-50K here, depending on what you want to do. Auto pilot broken. An STEC two axis AP is about $11K installed. It was used as a survey aircraft and has a certified hole cut. I could potentially use it for aerial work as my company subs about $50,000 in photography per year (5 jobs). I have a good pilot to split costs with. He has the commercial rating and would fly while working. Insurance would be $10,000 for the commercial type. I am a bit concerned about the $80/ hour fuel burn and the potential for gremlins on an older not so well maintained airplane. The price seems very reasonable which is the main motivation for buying. 25,000+5000+5000+5000= $40,000 for a aztec with new props, survey hole, new paint and interior. Am I missing something? Is this a good deal? An old neglected twin is never a good deal. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Dennis O'Connor wrote: Next, you may find that the props and hubs are out of limits.. He said it has brand new props. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Stadt" writes:
Buy it for $25K put $100K into it and you will have a $75K airplane. Wow! Those numbers tell almost the exact story of my 1966 Turbo Aztec. Mine was sold as "salvage - parts only" though. The subject line of this story caught my eye because that's the amount of the first check we wrote for our plane (as "salvage - for parts only"). We've often said it would have still been a bad deal if we'd gotten it for nothing, but it's a great plane and I have a hard time imagining anything else working so well for our typical trips. If I went through this again, I'd want to work out something with the seller so that I could buy an airworthy plane. That might mean making some agreement on paying up to some maximum amount to have a mechanic work on the plane before it becomes yours. You'd still pay for the work but if it turns out that the spar needs to be replaced (about the only thing mine *didn't* need), you'd be off the hook. --kyler |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
As other have posted. Two words of advice: "Run" and "Away". Seriously.
The plane you describe in the condition you describe is likely junk. Salvage. Please keep looking and find a decent airplane. Spend the $80k to get one "ready to go". Better yet, spend $100k and get a newer one in better condition. Airplane economics are unlike anything else on the planet (except maybe US government defense spending). You can easily spend way more to get this plane operational than it is worth. 1200 SMOH on the engines? Figure replacing both of them immediately. Why? A plane that has been deteriorated as you describe is not going to miraculously have decent engines. They are no doubt in the same shape as the rest of the plane. Beat up, cheaped out, worn out. If they were recent factory overhauls with warranties, MAYBE. One cracked cylinder... so far. Good airplanes are not sold with this kind of laundry list. The seller(s) KNOWS it will cost more to bring the thing up to snuff than they could possibly fetch. Otherwise, why would they not get the work done and MAKE MORE MONEY????? My rule of thumb is: consider a plane with no more than ONE weak area (engine(s)/prop(s), airframe paint, interior, avionics). This plane needs all 4. Game over. Your avionics guy is an excellent choice to check out the plane... AVIONICS. Nothing more. You need a type-familiar IA to do a $500-$1000 pre-buy inspection on this beast. Others will scream at that price (remember gang, 2 engines, 2 props, landing gear, 30+ year old plane), but pre-buys are just like insurance - pay a little, get a lot.. of risk! Don't worry, you will most likely never finish the pre-buy inspection. I would put money on the inspection stopping very early on when several other major problems are "discovered". The market is depressed and planes are moving slowly. You should be able to leverage a pretty good deal on a decent plane if you keep looking. Good Luck, Mike david wrote: I have a chance to buy a 63 aztec in rough condition. It would be my first plane. Engines have 1200 smoh but one has a cracked cylinder. (estimated repair, $5000?) Paint is poor. ($5000 estimate?) Interior is poor ($5000 estimate?). Brand new props. Only 1 nav/com. older avionics. Auto pilot broken. It was used as a survey aircraft and has a certified hole cut. I could potentially use it for aerial work as my company subs about $50,000 in photography per year (5 jobs). I have a good pilot to split costs with. He has the commercial rating and would fly while working. Insurance would be $10,000 for the commercial type. I am a bit concerned about the $80/ hour fuel burn and the potential for gremlins on an older not so well maintained airplane. The price seems very reasonable which is the main motivation for buying. 25,000+5000+5000+5000= $40,000 for a aztec with new props, survey hole, new paint and interior. Am I missing something? Is this a good deal? Most of the similar year planes I have seen are about $80,000. My buddy is an avionics repaiman and would thoroughly check the plane prior to the purchase. Could it be resold at a profit if I needed to? Please give any advice as I don't want to make a big mistake. Thanks in advance. David *** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com *** Add a newsgroup interface to your website today. __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Paint is poor. ($5000 estimate?)
Since it cost me $12,000 to paint my Skyhawk, this seems a little low for an Aztec. Ouch, it's only costing me about 6K to have the Navion painted. Of course, I'm doing it in a rather low cost area of the country. I actually flew mine from New York to Florida to have the paint job done there (Hoover Aircraft Refinishing-Tampa Bay Exec). The job included new glass all around, and was done in Jan 2000. Here I am 4 years later and she still looks brand new--tied down outside in the brutal heat of August and the freezing snow and ice of New York winter. When I was asking for quotes up here in the NY area, I was getting $12-14K prices and 6 month waiting lists. www.Rosspilot.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gear problem in an Aztec PA23-250 | Robert Borucki | General Aviation | 3 | December 17th 04 07:08 PM |
WTB: Piper Aztec C | Jim Burns | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 20th 04 07:38 PM |
PIREP: 2I3 (Rough River State Park, Falls of Rough, KY) | Kyler Laird | General Aviation | 0 | March 1st 04 12:11 AM |
Piper Aztec handling qualities | John McFarlane | Owning | 1 | October 3rd 03 04:11 PM |
rough engine just after power reduction | Sydney Hoeltzli | Owning | 11 | July 30th 03 03:37 PM |