If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why were almost all of them scrapped?
Many of the higher performance military machines had construction or
flight characteristics that were not acceptable in a civilian environment. An example of this was the de Havilland Mosquito, which had a 'dead man's gap' - an engine failure just after lift-off and before the aircraft attained a certain speed just could not be controlled, and would always result in an uncontrollable roll towards the dead engine and a crash. Peter I flew some multis in service but haven't flown them since (too expensive!). But it's my impression that students are taught to quickly cut the good engine and land straight ahead. Wouldn't that work with a Mosquito? (I realize that landing a plywood box straight ahead at around 100 knots might not be the most pleasant thing to contemplate.) vince norris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Australia F111 to be scrapped!! | John Cook | Military Aviation | 35 | November 10th 03 11:46 PM |