If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
contact terminology?
Neither the principle nor the turning-on of a TCAS system is particularly difficult to understand. At least I do not find them so; perhaps they might be challenging for some. If it were widely difficult to understand and use, however, it wouldn't be very useful. How often have you used TCAS or any other traffic warning system? |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
contact terminology?
On Sep 11, 6:08*am, Michael Huber wrote:
Sam Spade wrote: The guy just plain ****es me off. If you want to ignore him, ignore him. If you want to argue his points, argue his points. But blanket ad hominem attacks are IMO neither constructive nor conducive to a pleasant atmosphere in this newsgroup. Furthermore, at least for me, it makes it harder ignore MXS if I choose to do so because while he is in fact in my killfile, you aren't, and I see your replies to his posts. So please, in the interest of an improved SNR here, just ignore him if you don't want to argue with him. Agreed. There should be more than enough history built up at this point that anyone can find, to realize that there's no value being added. New readers that don't do due diligence on this (or any) group get what they deserve by jumping into the deep end. The vets already understand the game of self-inflation being played, so why provide a right hand for rosey to use? |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
contact terminology?
"Michael Huber" wrote in message
... Sam Spade wrote: The guy just plain ****es me off. So please, in the interest of an improved SNR here, just ignore him if you don't want to argue with him. I've found he doesn't agrue if you use the 'reply' feature of outlook, rather than the 'reply group' feature. He's just looking for attention, so if you don't reply publicly, he's not interested. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
contact terminology?
Viperdoc writes:
How often have you used TCAS or any other traffic warning system? Every time I fly. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
contact terminology?
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... Viperdoc writes: How often have you used TCAS or any other traffic warning system? Every time I fly. Exactly. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
contact terminology?
Every time I fly. What brand TCAS? Are you using a 28v or 12 v system? What kind of display? Are you actually flying now, or still playing MSFS? |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
contact terminology?
"Viperdoc" wrote in message
... Every time I fly. What brand TCAS? Are you using a 28v or 12 v system? What kind of display? He wouldn't know because he's sitting in coach munching on peanuts. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
contact terminology?
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:52:00 GMT, "Mike" nospam@ microsoft.com
wrote: "Viperdoc" wrote in message ... Every time I fly. What brand TCAS? Are you using a 28v or 12 v system? What kind of display? He wouldn't know because he's sitting in coach munching on peanuts. It doesn't even do that. Why the hell do we even deal with it any more? For the love of god everyone just killfile and move on. How about complaining to it's ISP for violating the charter of the rec.aviation groups where it doesn't fly ror have any intent to - go back to the sim groups where it belongs. This is truely, seriously getting silly. I killfiled it yonks ago but keep getting all the replies. Ignore and it will eventually go away and maybe we can get a number of useful groups back. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
contact terminology?
Viperdoc writes:
What brand TCAS? Are you using a 28v or 12 v system? The sim provides the TCAS input for the display (which is the only simulated part), so brand is not relevant. Likewise for the electrical system. What kind of display? In the Baron, the display is a Sandel ST3400. In the airliners, it's part of the overall avionics suite, which I think is made by Honeywell and other subcontractors. Are you actually flying now, or still playing MSFS? If you cannot tell, then it doesn't matter. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
contact terminology?
Just go look it up! writes:
How about complaining to it's ISP for violating the charter of the rec.aviation groups where it doesn't fly ror have any intent to - go back to the sim groups where it belongs. ISPs have to deal with one person complaining about another all day long. About 99.99% of those complaints go into the wastebasket. There's no requirement to obey any charter (which hasn't been violated, anyway). There is no violation of TOS. And often the ISP isn't even providing the newsgroup service (lots of people here use Google, alas! or some other dedicated newsgroup service). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Traffic/Pilot Terminology | [email protected] | Piloting | 32 | July 24th 07 10:25 AM |
VFR terminology in Class B | Matt | Piloting | 17 | February 27th 07 03:55 PM |
Pressure Altitude and Terminology | Icebound | Piloting | 0 | November 27th 04 09:14 PM |
New Aviation Terminology | DeltaDeltaDelta | Piloting | 45 | December 4th 03 08:31 AM |
Humour: CO DATA PAGE TERMINOLOGY CAT:BTN SUB:DES PGE:TRM | Dave Kearton | Military Aviation | 0 | September 24th 03 10:38 AM |